#leadership

Posts mentioning hashtag #leadership

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #leadership.

Mention #leadership in your post to continue the discussion!

Who built T-Mobile?

Contrary to popular belief, the layoffs did not start with the Sprint Merger, Covid, or change in leadership from John Leger to Mike Sievert. Instead, the demise of T-Mobile and subsequent layoffs started with the exedous of one employee. That employee was so regarded by Legere, Sievert, and the fellow C-Suite, that when DT came to town, they deferred to "them". All of the UC ideas, "them". Home Internet, "them". T-Mobile Tuesdays, "them" - the list is so long, say it with me, "them". That person is long gone - but the shell of "their" company - survives today. It is because of "them",
not Legere, not Sievert, not any of the active leadership, why any of us even have a job still - as without "them", we would have been bought my Marcelo in 2021, not vice-versa. To think we laid this MF off instead of promoting them to CEO....


Stankey’s First Culture Misstep Was Wearing Jammies

In a world of ‘tough as nails’ innovators, it’s difficult to be inspired by Grampa Stankeylegg to run your organization like you own it when he refuses to own his own mistakes. And who says “air cover” when referring to leadership and culture. Try setting realistic, simple priorities out of the gate on Jan 1 that reflect what a 150-year old utility company should focus on - product delivery and product quality. Fire 99% of L3 and above, they are just there for “air cover” to keep the board from finding out the company is just a hollow shell compared to its former greatness.


Dinner with Larry, Zooms with Larry, but no, Larry's definitely not involved in the company's decision making!!

Ah yes, I remember all those times Bob Bakish had his father come to business dinners to talk about mergers, or had him hop on Zoom calls with advisors. It's totally a normal thing for CEOs to have their daddies help them with their jobs.

From THR (link below):

“If we have the privilege to work together you will see that my father and I are the people you had dinner with,” Ellison wrote. “We are always loyal and honorable to our partners and hope we have the opportunity to prove that to you. Best, David”.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/inside-paramount-bid-warner-bros-discovery-david-ellison-1236445012/


Left after 10 years

After 10 years with UHC I finally called it quits over a month ago. It's been the most relieving feeling I have ever felt, seriously no lie! The constant changes, being chastised by a big headed manager who did not take accountability for her own faults, and exceeding expectations on MAP review but never reaping the benefits from it. The job that I am at now I make 1.20 less an hour but still make more, make it make sense...where was all my money going. Also my health insurance is so much cheaper and better, I never understood that? Run don't walk if you can, find something that works better for you and your family and also better for you financially.


Dan Schulman's headcount cuts at PayPal in 2023, 2024

Dan Schulman's headcount cuts at PayPal, primarily in 2023 (around 2,000 employees) and 2024 (another 9% of workforce), were a strategic move for operational efficiency and cost reduction in a tough market, saving significant annual costs (estimated $260M+), but whether they fully "helped" is mixed, as the company continued restructuring and facing competition, with Schulman moving to Verizon.shortly after, indicating ongoing challenges in the sector.

Why the Cuts Happened:
Economic Headwinds: Fears of a global slowdown and inflation pressured tech companies, requiring adaptation.

Strategic Pivot: The cuts aimed to streamline operations, increase efficiency, and better compete with agile fintech rivals.

Cost Management: A major goal was to reduce expenses, with projected savings of hundreds of millions annually from the job cuts.
Impact & Outcome:

Short-Term Savings: The layoffs immediately reduced employee-related costs, with estimates suggesting significant annual savings.
Strategic Modernization: The restructuring aimed to modernize PayPal's platform, simplify processes, and improve scalability, but it was an ongoing effort.
Leadership Transition: Schulman stepped down as CEO in late 2023, leaving the company to continue adapting under new leadership, while he took on the CEO role at Verizon in 2025, implementing similar efficiency drives.
In essence, the cuts were a necessary cost-cutting measure to improve efficiency, but they reflect a broader industry shift, and their ultimate success is part of a longer-term story of PayPal's evolving market position.

Jan 30, 2023 — PayPal CEO Dan Schulman announced that the company is cutting 2,000 employees, or about 7% of its workforce.

Payments Dive
PayPal to cut 9% of workforce to bolster efficiency - Payments Dive
Jan 29, 2024 — PayPal to cut 9% of workforce to bolster efficiency


Coffee With Dan!!

I will deeply miss Run With Hans, but I am grateful we have something else to look forward to with Dan being a coffee aficionado. Coffee With Dan! It was so cool seeing him stand on stage with his cup of joe and talking about coffee. It really helped me cope with the layoffs and took my mind off losing 400,000 customers this year. With our Billion dollar Formula 1 contract, I hope he gets all of the executives to attend F1 in Brazil in November. I bet he can have some great coffee while he is there.

Let's go V Teamers!!


The Street: CEO Revealing Mistakes

Verizon CEO Defends 13,000 Layoffs Amid Market Share Struggles

Verizon’s new CEO, Dan Schulman, has vigorously defended the recent decision to eliminate 13,000 jobs, framing the mass layoffs as an "inevitable" step to save the company from continued decline. In a candid all-hands meeting on December 5, Schulman attributed the telecom giant's struggles to "self-inflicted wounds," including complex promotions and price hikes that have alienated customers and eroded market share.

The drastic workforce reduction, executed in November, was part of a strategy to "simplify" operations and free up capital to improve the customer value proposition. Schulman, who took the helm in October following the ousting of Hans Vestberg, argued that minor cuts would have been insufficient. "If we don’t have enough money to put back into our value proposition to customers, we are going to continue to shrink," he told employees.

The layoffs come at a time when Verizon is grappling with significant performance issues. The company reported a loss of 7,000 postpaid phone customers in the third quarter of 2025, with a churn rate rising to 0.91%. Schulman noted that Verizon has lost 500 to 700 basis points of market share over the last five years. He frankly admitted that customer satisfaction scores are lagging behind competitors like T-Mobile, a situation exacerbated by price increases that have "irritated" subscribers.

Verizon's job cuts were a major contributor to a spike in unemployment within the telecommunications sector. According to data from Challenger, Gray, & Christmas, the industry saw over 15,000 job cuts in November alone—the highest monthly total since April 2020. This move aligns with a broader trend of workforce reductions across the U.S., where job cuts surpassed 1.1 million for the year, with the tech and telecom sectors being particularly hard hit.

https://www.thestreet.com/retail/verizon-ceo-reveals-mistakes-that-led-to-over-13000-layoffs


The King is "visiting"

So rumor has it King Kobi will grace us with his presence next week. And of course we have to look our best, appear professional. Why? He literally zooms through the office in his entourage of sycophants, without a glance, smile, or nod to the ACTUAL workers. Why do we have to "dress appropriately" for someone who has zero interest in looking at us? He really doesn't see us at all.


TDC Townhall

We just had a TDC Townhall and everyone was saying kudos to everyone. While recognition is good, we also received word from our TDC leaders that there is a 20% cap on the number of TDC associates who can receive a rating of for 2025. If things were so great, why impose a cap? This is so frustrating.


Leaders are so behind

How are we still trying to figure out how to do things other companies with fewer resources figured out years ago?

I hear so many L7+ leaders from stores, supply chain, digital, etc. talk about things that are already close to irrelevance.

I’ve only been at Target for a couple of years, but from the outside it didn’t seem this bad. Seriously, how did we get here?


For Pete’s sake, retire!

I know it’s easy to point fingers when things are not going well but where was our fearless leader 2025?

While the ship was sinking in 2025, he was no where to be found.

From the start, he took care of all his friends regardless of whether they had the experience or not to work the position.

This is the same guy who told us nothing would change when we were transitioned over to CUSA other than our email. He said it would be a good move for the company to help align support. Can anyone still employed at Canon USA (formerly CSA) say things have improved with the transition?

When he felt intimidated, he created useless buffers by promoting his old friends from Chicago. When he felt people were pushing him out he turned up the heat and forced them out.

Anyone could have run this company during the good times. It’s the tough times that show who the true leaders are. It’s safe to say our leader played and hide and go seek for this entire year. Maybe someone should tell him the game is over and it’s time to leave Melville and buy a one way ticket back to Chicago.

Good luck Mason, it’s safe to say you inherited a mess at the hands of your colleague.


IGS Leadership Exodus

Two big exits in two weeks. Honestly feels like things might finally be moving in the right direction. Really hoping the unannounced / undecided LSS interim is the one we’re all secretly pulling for. And that today's announced CTO interim doesn’t end up permanent. Who's the next one to go?


Tinkering

I was doing some tinkering with AI and thought to share:

⭐ 3. Set internal boundaries with AI pressure and dashboards

Dashboards are not reality.
AI promises are not reality.
The “push of a button” narrative is not reality.

But your body reacts like they are threats.

To protect yourself, create a mental mantra:

“Leadership’s metrics are not my emergency.”

Repeat it when:
• deadlines shift
• new reviews drop suddenly
• AI hype creates worker panic
• leadership frames scarcity as urgency

Your job is to contribute — not to sacrifice your health for an algorithm.


I'm done carrying the extra load

This "leadership" keeps cutting people and stacking the leftovers on whoever stays. They already started again, and I am determined not to take on another unwanted task. We all kept absorbing the hit and pretending it was normal, but that ends for me today. If pushing back puts a target on my back, so be it.


PepsiCo S&T Townhall = Pure Spin. No truth

Today’s S&T townhall was a masterclass in corporate spin. They bragged about “wins” and “momentum,” but flat-out refused to address the mess happening behind the scenes. Not a single word about the plants being shut down. No mention of the layoffs already underway. No acknowledgment of the teams stretched thin or the projects that failed.

Leadership acted like everything is perfect while people’s jobs are on the line. They know employees are anxious. They know closures are happening. They know cost-cutting is hitting hard. And yet they chose to pretend none of it exists.

This wasn’t a townhall — it was a PR show.
If PepsiCo wants any credibility left, they need to stop hiding behind glossy slides and start telling the truth.


Cascade 3

Next cascade should focus on redoing cascade 1. Since cascade 2, we’ve seen the same incompetent leadership coming through. How about doing cascade 1 correctly before shaving associates first? As they say, it all starts with leadership and we have it seen one in a while. Btw… doing listening posts is not enough.


Olympic Games for Managers and above

What if we had Olympic Games for Managers and above? Categories would include:
1- Reporting your dubious achievements through rose tinted glasses
2- Schmoozing your peers and superiors while neglecting your own department
3- Running your team ragged while having little to no impact
4- Promoting as many unqualified people as possible
5- Running around like a chicken with its head cut off
6- Failing up

Do you know any potential gold medalists?


GN&T Musical Chairs

GN&T did their usual shuffle of ADs and SDs after the RIF. For those that are unfamiliar, once a year or once every few years, they shuffle ADs and SDs from one department that they’re unqualified to lead to another where they’re typically even less qualified. It’s one of the many brilliant strategies that have allowed the competition to catch up or even surpass VZ