#leadershipteam

Posts mentioning hashtag #leadershipteam

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #leadershipteam.

Mention #leadershipteam in your post to continue the discussion!

Reality vs not at Ford

This defines our “leadership” deficit:

The reality:
Ford acquired its ADT joint-venture "Canopy" and discontinued its standalone Pickup Cam. Original hardware and app subscribers are receiving full hardware refunds and are no longer supported.

The Ford “leadership” bio:
He also co-founded and led the AI-driven venture Canopy from inception through a joint venture and its successful acquisition by Ford Motor Company.

How do you call a venture that refunded all customer money SUCCESSFUL???
Only at Ford would this person still have a job.


Advisor Gateway

Advise Gateway is a J O K E! Craven is a joke. SG is a joke. Let’s push MLI’s, which will blow up at sone point , because we make more money on them. Oh yeah, let’s push Alternative Investments because we make more money on them. REG BI and KYC be damned. Jimmy you are the master at national sales.


Leadership

Why is leadership teams so unnecessarily large? What real value do they actually add? They hold fancy titles but contribute nothing to product strategy or execution. Most seem obsessed with impressive job titles, posting on LinkedIn, and organizing pointless town halls that drain everyone's energy. These aren't leaders,they're overpaid parasites feeding off the work of G5/G6 employees.


Fire Stephanie and her cronies!

This lady and her puppets are ridiculous. If we could all be so fortunate to get paid millions of dollars to run companies to the ground none of us would worry about being laid off. Contracts for these people are ridiculous. You know even if she was let go her payout would be so crazy that her life style would not change and she would go down the road to the next corporate office and show them how much money she saved FIS and the cycle would start all over again.


My boss is getting replaced

It hasn't been announced yet, but the writing is on the wall.

I'm not sad to see him go; he's a terrible leader and generally incompetent, but now we're likely to report to his self-serving lackey.

Out of the frying pan, into a similar frying pan.

3M has eviscerated the talent pipeline, so everyone in management are the leftover dregs who couldn't find a new role at a better company.


Frontier Leadership

I dont know if ya'll followed but basically the whole Frontier top leadership team decided to leave. They weren't pushed out, they chose to leave. We needed that talent and I don't know how we let that happen. Another Verizon leadership failure. Perhaps our leadership felt threatened?


The day Jennifer retired, the building felt staged

Friday afternoon brought the usual choreography. A polite email chain. A cake that looked like it came from the same vendor everyone uses when they want to appear thoughtful without actually being thoughtful. Handshakes, laughter that arrived a half second late, compliments delivered like obligations. Jennifer smiled the way people do when they are leaving a place they have already emotionally left behind months ago.

I remember thinking that the goodbyes were too smooth. Too clean. Like the floor had been swept already.

By Monday morning the layoffs started.

That is what made it feel cruel, not just business. The timing had the sharpness of intent. There was no breathing room between the farewell and the damage, no pause that might suggest humanity, only a clean cut that made it obvious someone had been waiting for the moment the gate swung open.

People talk about reorganizations as if they are weather. Something that happens above us. Something inevitable.

But this did not feel like weather. It felt like a decision.

Salim’s new structure was being sold as alignment, as simplification, as focus. The slogans were familiar. The language was polished. Yet the shape of it was unmistakable. Power was consolidating. Regional teams were being pulled into functions under Salim’s organization, a transfer presented as efficiency but experienced as control. In the hallways and in quiet chats between meetings, people didn’t call it a transition. They called it a takeover.

And the pattern of who benefited was obvious enough that it stopped being a rumor and started becoming something you could map.

The regional vice presidents were now clearly tied to Salim’s orbit. Soufiane ran Central West, and it was no secret that he and Salim were close. Not close in the way corporate leaders pretend to be close on stage. Close in the real way. Fifteen years of shared history, private conversations, vacations and dinners, familiarity so deep that it didn’t need to be explained. Their friendship did not stay outside the office. It lived in the room with them.

Bob ran Northeast South and had his own history with Salim, a relationship that had grown in Bellevue the way these things always grow. Proximity becoming trust, trust becoming access, access becoming protection. People called it networking. People who weren’t invited called it something else.

Under Salim’s umbrella, the functional leaders stood like pillars around him. Naveen led Field Engineering. Jon handled Field Operations and Resilience. Craig ran Customer and Stakeholder Engagement. Jeff drove Network Build Strategy and Execution. Pankaj owned Insights Enablement Strategy.

On paper it looked like a clean machine. In real life it felt like a court.

I had worked for Harlan for many years. Harlan was not a performer. He didn’t need a spotlight to be effective. He was one of those leaders who could walk into a problem and understand it from the inside out, not because he had read a summary but because he actually knew the work. He could speak in specifics and still respect the larger mission. He was demanding, sometimes exhausting, but his intelligence felt honest. It made you sharper. It made you better.

So when Harlan was replaced and Bob moved into the space he left behind, it hit me like a personal insult. Not because Bob was incompetent. Bob was fine. But fine was not the point. The point was that it didn’t feel earned. It felt selected.

It felt like the kind of choice that happens when the decision is already made before any interviews are scheduled. When the criteria is not performance or vision but belonging. Being inside the circle. Being the familiar face that doesn’t threaten the center.

That is what broke something in me. Not the change itself, but the reason underneath it.

Jeff was another kind of story. Jeff could talk. He had that smooth tone that made everything sound inevitable and exciting, like the future was a place he had already visited and you were lucky he came back to describe it. People laughed at his jokes even when they weren’t funny. People nodded while he spoke even when his points were thin. His confidence was persuasive, and that is what made him dangerous.

To me, Jeff lacked the ability to truly imagine the future of technology. He could repeat what was popular. He could package an idea. He could drive change with force. But too often the vetting was half cooked, the risks minimized, the unknowns waved away as if skepticism itself were a character flaw. He moved fast and demanded agreement, and when reality pushed back, the cost landed on everyone else.

Worse than that, he took disagreement personally.

If you challenged him, he didn’t argue like an engineer. He didn’t test the idea. He tested you. He smiled while he did it, as if he were being helpful, as if he admired your passion, and then he found quieter ways to punish you. Your name disappeared from a thread. Your project got reassigned. Your feedback became concerns about alignment. Your performance review suddenly included words like attitude and collaboration.

He didn’t have to raise his voice. He just had to decide you were inconvenient.

I remembered stories from Sprint, the ones people told when they thought nobody important could hear. How budgets were treated like personal allowances. Trips that were always justified as necessary. Dinners that were always framed as stakeholder building. Complaints delivered as if the organization existed to soothe him. And the constant sense that someone else would eventually be held responsible for whatever didn’t work.

Craig played a different game. Craig knew how to lean upward. He knew how to speak in the language leadership wanted to hear. He also knew how to keep his team in the shadows.

He didn’t protect them out of kindness. He protected them out of control. Visibility creates independent relationships. Visibility creates recognition. Visibility creates options.

Craig preferred to be the only bridge. Work traveled up through him and credit traveled back down as vague praise. He would take what you built and present it with his fingerprints on it, then later he would tell you privately how much he appreciated you, as if appreciation could substitute for acknowledgment.

That kind of leadership doesn’t just drain people. It teaches them to stop trying.

Then there were the ones everyone stopped defending.

Luis had earned his fall. Too much posturing, too little substance. Too many speeches, too few results. He always had a reason, always had a story, always had someone else to point at when the numbers didn’t match the claims. When the demotion came, nobody looked surprised. Some people looked relieved.

And John, who once said, back at Sprint, that he liked us, that we were good, that we just needed the right structure, had also been quick to blame Marcelo when things collapsed. Marcelo became the convenient name to carry the weight. The scapegoat that made failure feel explainable.

But Marcelo wasn’t here anymore. So I found myself asking a question I didn’t say out loud in meetings, a question that burned anyway. Now what. Now that you cannot blame him, what will you call it.

People were tired. Not the kind of tired that a weekend fixes. The kind of tired that gets into your bones after years of being told you are lucky to be here while you are worked past your limits, after watching friendships win promotions while competence gets cut, after realizing that loyalty only matters when it flows upward.

And the thing that hurt most was how normal everyone tried to make it sound.

They called it optimization. They called it efficiency. They called it the future.

But it felt like exploitation.

Work until you have nothing left, then watch the ones with the right relationships keep their seats while the rest of you are treated like a cost line. It makes you start thinking in ways you never planned to think. It makes you look at competitors you used to dismiss and feel a strange longing for basic dignity.

I found myself thinking I would rather pay more elsewhere if it meant being treated like a human being. I found myself imagining what it would look like to stop defending a brand that no longer defended its people.

By the end of that Monday, it wasn’t just the layoffs that changed the room. It was the clarity.

The organization had a new shape now, and it was obvious who it was built around. The rest of us were just expected to fit ourselves into the empty spaces.


Leaders are so behind

How are we still trying to figure out how to do things other companies with fewer resources figured out years ago?

I hear so many L7+ leaders from stores, supply chain, digital, etc. talk about things that are already close to irrelevance.

I’ve only been at Target for a couple of years, but from the outside it didn’t seem this bad. Seriously, how did we get here?


Hello corporate "leaders" watching your employees struggle

We know you are in here watching these threads, much like you sit and watch your minimally staffed teams struggle and break under workloads. If you have a shred of humanity in you, we are PEOPLE, not machines. While labor laws are pretty sh-t in this country, they do exist. Also, your job will not last forever either and we hope the people you burn while you sit and watch people struggle helps to keep you warm when you attempt to get your next job.


Technology SLT Shuffle - When and who will win?

It’s been over six months since Bridget came on board, so a major reshuffle in her leadership team seems inevitable at some point. I’m honestly surprised there haven’t been any changes yet. Who do you think is likely to raise or move on when it happens?


Legalized corruption

As the end of the year draws close, VP of Indian origin are planning company funded end of year business trips to be with their friends and extended family trips to India. They don’t have money to fund our bonuses but will do everything immoral to accomplish their ends. Shame on you Shankar under whose watch this company has run aground. It really needs to die so that none of you make any money off this.


Better off?

I was laid off from Microsoft after 2 years. Here's why I didn't freak out, and I'm absolutely better off.

Raheel Khawaja was laid off from Microsoft in 2023. While working there, he built alternative income streams. Now, he said he's better off.

https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-cutting-jobs-again-better-off-after-being-laid-off-2025-8

Business Insider
Aug/26/2025 04:24 PM