#shareholder

You asked, we listened! Our vteam family let us know they wanted to reduce vacation accrual max from 150% to 125%. This gives our superstars more time to set the foundation to play to win. It also helps reduce severance for future rifs which delights our shareholders. I am humbled, honored and energized for all we have accomplished as we continue to build the future at scale - together!

Content and technology company Thomson Reuters faces a shareholder vote at its annual meeting on Wednesday over its U.S. government contracts for services that some investors and employees say may help power the Trump administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/thomson-reuters-faces-shareholder-vote-over-ice-contracts-2026-06-10/

https://seekingalpha.com/news/4601923-activist-jana-wants-fiserv-to-sell-more-assets-refresh-board---report

Price on July 1, 2020 $23.40
Price on June 4, 2026 $22.66 (intraday)

Cumulative price return -3.2%
Annualized price return -0.5%

Print Baby Print: Xerox Shareholders Approve 15 Million More XRX Shares for Executive Compensation. (google this tittle)

"Shareholders rejected a proposal that would ‌have required an independent board chair separate from the CEO role, according to preliminary ​voting results at the annual ​meeting on Wednesday"

The title says it all. It’s great to be an OTEXer and shareholder. Our customers should be pleased.

Are Xerox Executives About to Cash Out Another $17 Million in Newly Issued Shares?

The Barbie bump didn’t last long and MOTU isn’t seeing a bump at. Maybe the Barney movie will do it…..

How are shareholders not demanding a change?

A Czech boutique investment fund called STARTEEPO Invest just bought 6.7 million shares of Xerox overnight.

They now own 5.15% of the company. That officially makes a group most people in Norwalk couldn't point to on a map the 4th largest shareholder of Xerox.

What is the move?

This isn’t a passive retirement fund quietly collecting dividends. STARTEEPO filed a Schedule 13D. In corporate speak, that means they plan on speaking up. They just bought a ticket to the party and now they (somehow) want to play the music.

Why now?

Because Xerox is currently on the operating table. The company’s stock price looks like a clearance rack. STARTEEPO looked at a business generating (well, trying to) half a billion dollars in free cash flow with a deeply depressed market value and thought (right or wrong): "It's free real estate".

For the Board of Directors: the cozy, quiet boardroom days are over. Carl Icahn left a vacuum when he exited, and the board probably thought they could restructure in peace. Enter František Bostl (STARTEEPO’s chief). The fund has already explicitly stated they want to "discuss board composition and strategy".

Translation: Pack your bags, some of you are getting evicted.

For Xerox Management: expect a massive fire under executive chairs to accelerate, tweak, even change the plans underway. If management can't turn a profit fast enough, this fund will happily find people who claim they can.

Xerox spent years trying to "reinvent" itself into a sleek, modern tech-and-services company; instead, they moved so slowly they became prime bait for a mid-sized European activist fund looking for a cheap, cash-generating target.

Now, Xerox either delivers on its promises immediately, or a fund from Prague is going to dictate the terms of its survival.

Your rights to voice your concern as a shareholder here.

Should we rename back Intel as number #1 chipmaker and no more layoff or still keep it as ShitTel for more layoffs to come?

1. Yes
2. No
3. Undecided
4. Don't care
5. Maybe

$1 billion share buyback announced while they have $500 million they still need to repurchase from the last buyback.
At the same time...the leadership team has wipes out the last 6 years of growth and gains.
They are basically gaslighting shareholders at this point as I'd rather be able to dump ally shares at $250 as opposed to $98.
The announcement didn't help stock price as it only stayed in the green for the first hour and a half of market open.

Teradata’s Autonomous Knowledge Platform is impressive! Is this the comeback shareholders have been waiting for?? #teradata #winning #tdcshareprice

The more layoffs there are, the higher the stock price goes.
Even if another half the workforce is cut, it doesn’t seem to affect the capitalists’ ability to make money—although the product keeps getting worse and the service keeps deteriorating.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/04/30/3285301/0/en/trian-calls-on-solventum-s-board-to-create-value-publishes-open-letter-and-slide-deck.html

Without the Junk Bond Yield.
Dividend Yield is just 4.2% to hold this no growth, debt dump truck, poorly managed, garbage CEO, shareholder abusing, ghost ship freighter of a company.

Just got word from union rep appears they are offering a 10k buyout shortly to entice employees to quit instead of collecting whatever garbage unemployment is available. Sounds like another big wave of layoffs is in the future until the shareholders are satisfied. I encourage everyone to start looking for other employment while you can

Anyone seen the embarrassing BBC article about Aberdeen Hydrogen and BP involvement.
Can BP shareholders find out how much BP invested ? Are there P45s now being handed out ?

We’re all getting hit with the same weekly barrage. This isn’t shared responsibility, they’re offloading theirs onto us. The nonstop AI push is conditioning so no one pushes back when the PIPs start, because PIPs are cheaper than severances. Meanwhile ROI looks great and the shareholder buybacks keep flowing, so leadership acts like everything is fine. As long as the numbers stay green, the people doing the work don’t matter.

Remember these guys? What a joke. These are what they claim they did below. I haven’t seen any of it. They just got in during low COVID stock price and then claim they were genius because stock price rose?

Action #1: Refresh the Board of Directors with energy experience.

Action #2: Impose greater long-term capital allocation discipline.

Action #3: Implement a strategic plan for long-term value creation.

Action #4: Align management compensation with value creation, not production growth.

If you have any Chevron shares vote for an independent board and against the Executive compensation.

We need legislation that will force companies to pay money into unemployment benefits, equal to their profits if they choose to move the workforce offshore, or replace with AI. Why should 93% of America suffer so the 7% of stockholders can benefit?

As a shareholder, in the latest proxy I voted against the executive compensation plan..

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/exxon-says-iran-war-will-curb-1q-production-by-6-4aa8c83e

What kind of id--t loses revenue with $100 oil price? As a shareholder, I demand DW get NSI ranking, and if he ever does this again in the next five years, be fire!

Xerox Holdings Corporation is asking shareholders to vote at its 2026 Annual Meeting on May 20, 2026 in Norwalk, Connecticut. Investors will elect nine directors, ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor for 2026, and cast an advisory Say‑on‑Pay vote on 2025 executive compensation.

Shareholders are also asked to approve an amendment to the 2024 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan to increase the share reserve, supporting long‑term, equity‑based pay. The proxy details board qualifications, ESG goals including a 2040 net‑zero target, workforce initiatives after the Lexmark acquisition, capital structure, related‑party notes, and director and officer share ownership.

I hold a small position in CVS. Tiny enough in relation to the rest of my portfolio that, to be frank, the entire company could be liquidated and I could care less. In fact I'd jump for joy.

But because I am a stockholder, I am eligible to vote in the annual meeting.

Here's how I am going to fill out my proxy card:

1. Directors: Vote against all of them.
2. Ratify the appointment of independent accounting firm: Vote against (of all questions, this probably matters the least, but voting against this sends a message)
3. Approve company executive compensation: Vote against (I don't care if they all end up in the poor house)
4. Approve the company's incentive compensation plan: Vote against (high level types covered by this plan are the ones driving CVS into the ground)
5. Stockholder proposal to reduce threshold to act by written consent: Vote for (goes against board recommendation, and why would anyone want less say in how CVS is run?)

Citi recently announced that its annual shareholder meeting will be May 20, 2026. If you contributed to the Citi Stock Fund in the 401k plan, then you are a stockholder and can vote in the upcoming meeting. Be on the lookout for the proxy statement in your mail, which will contain a ballot you can mail or info for how to vote online. Stockholders will vote on the following:

1 - Elect 13 directors
2 - Selection of the independent public accounting firm for 2026
3 - Advisory vote to approve 2025 executive compensation
4 - Approve additional shares for the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

Below is a link to the notice and proxy statement:
https://www.citigroup.com/rcs/citigpa/storage/public/Annual_Report/2025/2026-citi-proxy-statement.pdf

Make your voice heard as a current/former employee & shareholder!!

Nike’s entire board ought to be scrubbed at this point too. Zero accountability for failings of successive leadership teams. Waiting on evidence they take their fiduciary duties to shareholders seriously at this point. Activist and buyout the best outcome at this point to break cycle of layoffs and restructuring to hide lack of real strategy and leadership…

With layoffs happening this morning, it looks like the company may be in the middle of a broader cost-cutting and restructuring move. A possible explanation is that leadership is reducing headcount in areas it believes can be automated or absorbed by AI-enabled tools and smaller teams, with the aim of lowering costs, improving margins, and signaling a more efficient operating model to shareholders. If that is what is happening, the message is less about short-term performance and more about a transformation strategy centered on automation, leaner staffing, and investor-facing value creation.

Shareholder voting starts today.
Vote every single one of this board OUT

ad

ExxonMobil's breakthrough in fully automated offshore drilling in Guyana has significant implications for its shareholders. The automation system not only enhances drilling efficiency and execution but also offers potential cost savings and improved well economics. This shift towards automation may lead to a more consistent and reliable production profile, which is crucial for maintaining shareholder value. Additionally, the successful deployment of this technology could influence capital allocation for ExxonMobil's offshore projects, potentially protecting well economics amid volatile oil price cycles.

While the automation system introduces new risks, such as software failures and cyber vulnerabilities, the long-term benefits of increased efficiency and operational consistency are likely to outweigh these risks for ExxonMobil's shareholders. The company's ability to demonstrate the effectiveness of its automation technology in Guyana could serve as a blueprint for future field developments, potentially impacting capital allocation for other offshore projects and beyond.

Overall, ExxonMobil's automation breakthrough in Guyana represents a significant step forward for the company's upstream operations and could have a positive impact on its shareholders by enhancing operational efficiency and potentially protecting well economics.

https://energynews.africa/2026/03/18/exxonmobil-pioneers-fully-automated-offshore-drilling-in-guyana-redefining-future-project-economics/

Employees should have received an email today about voting your shares. If you want things to change around here, and if you don’t want executive pay to comically outstrip your actual productive work, then you MUST read the proxy statement and vote. It’s a hundred pages - not all 100 pages are important, but I can’t read them all for you. Vote down excessive compensation schemes. Vote for increased independent oversight where applicable. Grousing on thelayoff is fun but it doesn’t change anything. Management is always betting you are either too d-mb or too indifferent to even vote.

Shareholder here. I heard that LFAB is having major people problems. I am concerned. Can you please let me know if this is credible, and what is HR doing to address this problem.

The Heritage Foundation Submits Shareholder Proposal to Truist Financial Corporation

Published on 03/16/2026 at 07:01 am EDT
S&P Capital IQ
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

• 0.36%
  On March 16, 2026, The Heritage Foundation announced that it has submitted a shareholder proposal from Truist Financial Corporation, requesting the Company to conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year, at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary information and disclosure of anything that would constitute an admission of pending litigation, evaluating how Truist?s policies, public statements, and corporate partnerships may be misaligned with the values of its customer base, and how such misalignment may expose the company to significant legal, regulatory, and reputational risk, in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders scheduled to be held on April 28, 2026.

So, EM became a major shareholder of MDT and I would have bet the farm that GM had initially had discussions to come in to help with his agenda. Everything GM is doing now is exactly what EM would want anyways. But, the MDT position will be the worst investment decision EM will have made in its history.

The bigger mo--n then GM is Brett Whals

Paisner v. Tan, Del. Ch., No. 2026-0307
Paisner v. Tan is a shareholder derivative action filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery on March 5, 2026, seeking to void an "extortionary" deal involving a 10% stake in Intel Corporation sold to the U.S. government.
Case Overview
Plaintiff: Richard D. Paisner, an Intel shareholder represented by Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP and GM Law.
Defendants: Lip-bu Tan (Intel director), other Intel board members, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and the Department of Commerce.
Core Allegation: The lawsuit alleges that Intel's board was coerced into issuing approximately 10% (9.9%) of its equity to the Department of Commerce (DOC) for "no meaningful consideration" following public demands from President Donald Trump.
Key Legal Arguments
The complaint, which was partially unsealed on March 11, 2026, asserts several grounds for invalidating the transaction:
Lack of Congressional Authority: The suit argues that only Congress can authorize a federal agency to become a partial owner of a publicly traded company, and no such law exists for this transaction.
Extortion and Coercion: It alleges the board succumbed to "well-founded fears" regarding personal and professional relationships after President Trump publicly claimed CEO Lip-bu Tan was conflicted and should be fired.
Illegal Voting Agreements: The deal reportedly included provisions requiring the government to vote its 9.9% stake as directed by the Intel board and pledged government support for sitting directors. The plaintiff argues this created a conflict of interest by providing directors with a unique benefit not shared by other shareholders.
Pretextual Funding: The complaint claims the government demanded the shares as a "pretextual advancement" of funds Intel had already earned under a 2024 CHIPS Act agreement.
The case was initially filed under seal on March 5, 2026, and unsealed on March 11, 2026, with certain confidential information redacted. The plaintiff seeks an order canceling the deal and unspecified damages.
Bloomberg Law News

We all got multiple emails and letters to get us to sign over our voting rights as shareholders to the corporation. That’s pretty suspicious and I can’t imagine why anyone would be stupid enough to fall for it.

Now, we’re starting to get phone calls from these “advocates” at Innisfree M&A (look them up) to also try to get us to sign over our rights. Sketchy stuff.

So obviously the company is desperate because they have something unpopular they want to push through at the next shareholders meeting. What is it? Other than a fat executive compensation package, what would the company be trying to push that they need the employees’ shares (a minority position) to get through?

DON’T BE FOOLED - HOLD ON TO YOUR RIGHTS!

Nike Leadership finds a way to fail and lose shareholder value everyday...