#settlement

Posts mentioning hashtag #settlement

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #settlement.

Mention #settlement in your post to continue the discussion!

Top ten ShitTel lawsuits

https://lawyerinc.com/biggest-intel-lawsuits/

  1. Intel settles lawsuit for employment discrimination Settlement amount: $3.5 million
  2. Asalati v. Intel Corporation Settlement amount: $5 million
  3. Intel settles with Department of Labor Settlement amount: $5 million
  4. Intel settles high-tech antitrust case Settlement amount: $415 million
  5. Intel settles Intergraph lawsuit Settlement amount: $225 million
  6. Intel settles lawsuit with AMD Settlement amount: $1.25 billion
  7. The European Commission issues statement of guilt to Intel on antitrust violations Settlement amount: $1.44 billion
  8. Nvidia countersues Intel Settlement amount: $1.5 billion
  9. Intel settles with the Federal Trade Commission Settlement amount: $1.5 billion (suspended)
  10. Intel loses patent infringement lawsuit Settlement amount: $2.2 billion

Kroger Settles Environmental Violations Case

Kroger, Harris Teeter’s parent company, agreed to a major settlement. The company will invest $100 million. It will also pay a $2.5 million civil penalty. This settles Clean Air Act violations from 2014 to 2023. Violations involved refrigerant leaks across its 2,700-plus stores.

Charlotte, North Carolina

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/article315699866.html


LHX pays USG $62M for false pricing data

In my local Virginia paper, there was an article about LHX expanding its Orange County, VA rocket parts plant. The article ended with a paragraph about LHX providing false pricing data to the US Military in 2025 and had to pay $62M to USG. I’m I the only one who hadn’t heard about this?


Federal Court Approves R&R Janitorial $1.25M Bias Settlement

A federal court approved a $1.25 million settlement. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was a party. R&R Janitorial Painting and Building Services, Inc. was the defendant. This agreement resolves a five-year-old bias lawsuit. The suit alleged discrimination in connection with layoffs.

Washington, D.C.

https://www.law360.com/articles/2468827/eeoc-janitorial-co-get-ok-for-1-2m-deal-in-layoff-bias-suit


Epstein lawsuit

Bank of America has reached a $72.5m (£54.6m) settlement in a lawsuit brought on behalf of victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who had accused the bank of facilitating his s-x trafficking operation.

The proposed class-action lawsuit was filed in October by a Florida woman who says she was abused by Epstein "on at least 100 occasions" between 2011 and 2019 and held two accounts at Bank of America at the direction of his business team.

It alleged that the bank had "a plethora of information regarding Epstein's s-x trafficking operation but chose profit over protecting the victims".
BBC


$210 million settlement stipulations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case No. 3:23-cv-252-TJC-PDB
IN RE FIDELITY NATIONAL
INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan
Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale
STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

Page 10 - Individual Defendants” means Stephanie Ferris (including after
her voluntary dismissal), Gary Norcross, James Woodall, and Thomas Warren.


Is anyone interested in exploring a potential collective legal action related to workplace treatment at the company?

I’m asking for those who were bullied, treated unfairly, wrongfully terminated, or laid off under questionable circumstances.

A corporate-focused attorney independently raised this question. One of my coworkers had a very strong case, but ultimately withdrew after the company terminated the manager involved. In another case, an employee reportedly received a significant settlement, suggesting these concerns may not have been isolated.

At this point, I am only trying to understand how many people may have been affected and whether there is a shared pattern worth evaluating further. This is not an accusation, and no action would be taken without professional legal advice.

If this applies to you, you’re welcome to respond or reach out privately.


SF Reputation and RICO

When SF settled the RICO case for 250 Million it spoke volumes about the company reputation. To say it was settled as a business decision which IMO an admission of liability. This damaged the company and it continues to spiral downward by cutting benefits, laying workers off, and continuing to slash workers who believe and work hard to fulfill the mission and vision of the company. The company advertising deals with everything but the product itself. The customer is wise to its diversion tactics. On a local level, the company's reputation has tanked even within law enforcement. What was once the leader in all respects of ethics and business has literally been flushed down the toilet for money.


Antitrust Fine

The settlement requires the largest divestiture of outpatient healthcare services to resolve a merger challenge (by number of facilities) and imposes a $1.1M civil penalty for false certification
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland today entered the Final Judgment proposed by the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, together with its state co-Plaintiffs, requiring broad divestitures to resolve Plaintiffs’ challenge to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated’s (UnitedHealth) $3.3 billion acquisition of Amedisys Inc. In addition, Amedisys must pay a $1.1 million civil penalty to the United States for falsely certifying that it had provided “true, correct, and complete” responses under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.

“Under President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi, this Department of Justice has moved quickly to resolve transactions, ensuring Americans see the benefits sooner,” said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward. “This settlement preserves competition where it matters most for American families – healthcare.”

“This is a tremendous outcome for competition in the healthcare industry, where competition itself is critical to the public interest and the well-being of all Americans,” said Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “I commend the Antitrust Division’s Staff for prosecuting this case throughout a contentious litigation to reach this settlement on behalf of seniors, hospice patients, nurses, and their families.”

The settlement requires UnitedHealth and Amedisys to divest at least 164 home health and hospice locations (including one affiliated palliative care facility) across 19 states, accounting for approximately $528 million in annual revenue. By number of facilities, this is the largest divestiture of outpatient healthcare services to resolve a merger challenge. In addition, the proposed settlement:

Obligates UnitedHealth to divest eight additional locations if it fails to obtain regulatory approval for the divestiture of associated facilities without the additional locations;
Imposes a monitor to supervise UnitedHealth’s divestiture of the assets and compliance with the consent decree;
Provides the divestiture buyers with the assets, personnel, and relationships to compete against UnitedHealth in the overlap areas;
Incorporates robust protections to strengthen adherence to the decree and deter interference with the divestiture buyers’ ability to compete; and
Requires Amedisys to pay a $1.1 million civil penalty and train its corporate and field leadership on antitrust compliance for falsely certifying that the company had truthfully, correctly, and completely responded to the United States’ requests for documents.
The Court has appointed William E. Berlin, of Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, to serve as monitor in this matter.

UnitedHealth is a vertically integrated insurer, healthcare provider, pharmacy benefit manager, and healthcare software and services vendor headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. UnitedHealth acquired Amedisys’s home health and hospice rival LHC Group Inc. (LHC) in 2023. Amedisys was a home health and hospice


O wants to scale down.

Laid off as well, interesting package and settlement. The invite is indeed business update confidential blabla. My manager was so nervous, she had to read the message from her screen.I calmed her down a bit and then the word came out: due to intensive investments and business changes..... All opportunities are blocked, all hiring reqs on hold, maybe until April. It's serious now. O wants to scale down.