#cfo

Posts mentioning hashtag #cfo

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #cfo.

Mention #cfo in your post to continue the discussion!

Pascal got a 6 month notice

Pascal is off the payroll on Jan 1 2027 and received a 6 months notice whereas those who got surplussed today received a 2 weeks notice.

The 6 months is to complete knowledge transfer and to train the incoming CFO Jennifer Biry. Pascal’s annual compensation is approximately $12 million which means he will make $6 million before being off the payroll and heading off to the Bahamas for the rest of his life.

If they wanted any level of respectable fairness he would have the same notice period as everyone else but these executives treat their job as a full time guaranteed vacation.


Message for CEO: "Tell him that he's a piece of s---,"

One Meta worker interrupted a livestreamed presentation to thousands of colleagues, blasting the company over an open mic and demanding the call's leaders pass along a personal message to a Meta AI executive: "Tell him that he's a piece of s---," according to a recording reviewed by WIRED.

https://www.wired.com/story/mark-zuckerberg-meta-employee-meeting-interrupt-ai/

In that spirit:

Tell Chuck and the new bonus seeking CFO that they are pieces of s---.


Appropriate use of AI - What is happening and who should be held responsible... CEO or CFO or Both

According to reporting today, Centene offered voluntary buyouts to most employees and indicated layoffs could follow if enough employees don't accept. CEO Sarah London told employees, "When our membership shifts, we need to shift our organization accordingly." The company reportedly had about 61,000 employees in Q1 2026. (Bloomberg Law)

## Updated Timeline

### Phase 1: 2022–2024

New leadership takes over.

Board thesis:

  • Modernize Centene
  • Become more technology-driven
  • Improve member outcomes
  • Diversify beyond traditional Medicaid dependence

At this point, the strategy was defensible.

### Phase 2: 2024–2025

Warning signs emerge.

Management faced:

  • Medicaid redeterminations
  • Rising utilization
  • ACA Marketplace volatility
  • Expiring enhanced subsidies

This is where forecasting and scenario planning become critical.

### Phase 3: 2025–2026

The strategy begins unraveling.

What happened:

Membership

  • Medicaid enrollment declines.
  • ACA Marketplace enrollment drops far more than originally anticipated after subsidy changes and premium increases. Centene expected ACA membership to fall from roughly 5.5 million to about 3.5 million after repricing. (Healthcare Dive)

Financials

  • Massive earnings deterioration.
  • Guidance credibility damaged.
  • Investor confidence weakened. (Healthcare Dive)

Organization

  • Executive restructuring announced in April 2026. (Investor Relations | Centene Corporation)
  • Now voluntary buyouts and potential layoffs announced in June 2026. (Bloomberg Law)

# The New Insight

The buyout program is not the problem.

It is evidence of the problem.

When a payer begins broad voluntary separation programs after:

  • Membership losses
  • Earnings deterioration
  • Multiple prior layoffs
  • Organizational restructuring

it usually means management now believes the revenue base has permanently reset lower than previously expected. (Bloomberg Law)

In other words:

They are no longer planning for a temporary disruption.

They are resizing the company for a smaller future membership base.

That is a much more significant signal than the layoffs themselves.


# What This Says About Leadership

My view now:

## CFO Accountability: 40%

The CFO owns:

  • Forecasting
  • Scenario modeling
  • Guidance
  • Financial planning

The Marketplace membership collapse should have been modeled more aggressively.

Questions a board should ask:

  • What was the expected subsidy expiration impact?
  • What was the worst-case scenario?
  • Why were forecasts so far off?
  • Why did guidance have to be revised?

Those are CFO questions.


## CEO Accountability: 60%

The CEO owns:

### Strategic Direction

The critical decision wasn't the forecast.

The critical decision was:

"Marketplace will offset Medicaid losses."

That appears increasingly incorrect.

The company effectively:

  • Lost Medicaid members
  • Lost Marketplace members
  • Lost operating leverage

And now must shrink the workforce to match the new reality. (Bloomberg Law)

That's fundamentally a strategic issue.


# What Would a Board Likely Do?

If I were sitting on the board today, I would ask:

### Question 1

Was this primarily:

  • a forecasting failure?

or

  • a strategy failure?

The answer determines who goes.


### If Forecasting Failed

Replace:

  • CFO
  • Chief Actuary
  • Finance leadership

Retain CEO.


### If Strategy Failed

Replace:

  • CEO

Possibly retain CFO if forecasts reflected the risks and leadership ignored them.


# My Assessment Today

With everything now known:

  1. Medicaid losses
  2. Marketplace losses
  3. Subsidy expiration effects
  4. Pricing issues
  5. Guidance issues
  6. Workforce reductions
  7. Voluntary buyouts

I no longer see this as primarily a finance problem.

I see it as a strategy and execution problem.

The workforce reduction announcement is especially important because it demonstrates leadership is now reacting to membership losses rather than benefiting from a growth strategy. (Bloomberg Law)


# If This Were My Board Recommendation

Near term (next 6 months)

  • Replace or restructure portions of Finance and Actuarial leadership.
  • Bring in an external operating advisor with deep Medicaid and payer turnaround experience.
  • Require a comprehensive membership recovery and profitability plan.

Medium term (next 12 months)

If:

  • Membership stabilizes,
  • Margins recover,
  • Workforce reductions achieve targets,

then the CEO survives.

If:

  • ACA membership continues declining,
  • Medicaid pressure persists,
  • Another major earnings miss occurs,

then I would expect the board to seriously evaluate replacing the CEO.


## Final Assessment

Looking at Centene from before Sarah through today, the company appears to have moved from a highly disciplined Medicaid operator under Michael Neidorff to a company attempting a broader transformation under Sarah London. The challenge is that the transformation coincided with one of the most difficult payer environments in decades. The latest buyout program is a strong signal that leadership now believes the enrollment and revenue outlook is materially lower than previously expected, forcing the organization into another round of cost reductions. Based on the information available today, I would assign greater accountability to the CEO than the CFO because the root issue appears to be strategic positioning and market assumptions, not simply financial forecasting. (Bloomberg Law)


COO News

Ever since he got a promotion to Executive Vice President, he has withdrawn. Not as prominent. He looks over the CFO's shoulder constantly. He is under qualified and out of his league. He enjoys slashing revenue on plan pricing and can't seem to make up for it in any additional revenue. By the way, how is that Hedge Fund working out and when is the Firm going to become fully transparent with its performance and holdings ?


Net debt increase

After the net debt fiasco, the CFO is next to be jettisoned. To be replaced with someone better equipped to manage the balance sheet. I imagine the search has already been in progress.


3/16 & 3\17

rumors have it the stock market is set to let loose with the bottom falling out around 20%+then on 3\17, there is a hearing in nyc involving the former CFO, President, and ExVp of Sales/Marketing^^the heat is being turned up on fmr associates & looking to split their firm & turn each other on themselves. Nomore unjustenrichment you say ?


IBM Corruption

"Similarly, inside IBM, there are many whistleblowers and some of them come to us directly, others post in online forums. They're sick and tired of their lying CEO and crooked CFO, who seems to be focusing on financial engineering, not technical engineering." https://techrights.org/n/2026/02/17/Resisting_IBM_and_EPO_Corruption.shtml


What a ride - from great place to work to lord of flies!

I want to take a moment to express my deep appreciation for the culture at FactSet. Kissing a-s is the only way to get any meaningful traction.

Special dedication to the HRBP, L&D, Talent Delivery and Organisational Effectiveness leadership. Your inability to discern between noise and substance, between nuance and context is the reason for the unnecessary challenges we face in the business.

CFO, CPO - I hope you look at your stock awards and question your lack of judgment and willingness to take ethical stands that led to FactSet’s fall. No points for guessing how instrumental your contribution has been in deflating the firm’s value.

Special place in he-l for those gaslighting the outliers in the name of “culture”.


Kyndryl Shares Halved Amid CFO Departure, Accounting Review

There's no way IBM won't feel some residual effect from this.

https://www.wsj.com/business/c-suite/kyndryl-finance-chief-wyshner-leaves-amid-accounting-review-167cd93d

The company also cut its guidance for the year after posting third-quarter results below Wall Street expectations

By: Colin Kellaher and Elias Schisgall
Updated Feb. 9, 2026 10:19 am ET

Shares of Kyndryl KD Holdings lost more than half their value after the company’s chief financial officer left amid a review of accounting practices following an inquiry from the Securities and Exchange Commission

The information-technology-services infrastructure provider on Monday said finance chief David Wyshner had left the company, along with general counsel, Edward Sebold. The company also cut its guidance for the year after posting third-quarter results below Wall Street expectations.

Shares were down nearly 57% in recent trading to $10.18.

The New York-based company said its audit committee was reviewing its cash-management practices and related disclosures, including regarding the drivers of its adjusted free-cash-flow metric, as well as the efficacy of its internal control over financial reporting, according to a filing with the SEC. The review came after the SEC’s enforcement division requested certain documents from the company.

Kyndryl said that while it doesn’t expect the review to result in a restatement or other impact to its financial statements, it will delay filing its quarterly report with the SEC and expects to report material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2025 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2026.

The company said it needs more time to finalize its quarterly report, which covers the fiscal third quarter ended Dec. 31, adding that it is developing a remediation plan that it will outline in the report.

Kyndryl Chief Executive Martin Schroeter declined to comment further on the company’s earnings call. “The fact is we just can’t comment until the examination is complete,” he said. “The teams are working expeditiously so we can share a remediation plan.”

He added that the company’s fiscal 2028 goals remain intact.

For its latest quarter, Kyndryl posted an adjusted profit of 52 cents a share on revenue of $3.86 billion, shy of the 60 cents a share and $3.89 billion, respectively, that analysts had penciled in.

The company said it now expects its full-year revenue to fall by 2% to 3% in constant currency, after previously forecasting a 1% rise. It also cut its full-year guidance for adjusted pretax income and free cash flow.

Harsh Chugh, Kyndryl’s global head of practices, corporate development and administration, has stepped in as interim chief financial officer, and Mark Ringes, deputy general counsel since 2024, will serve as interim general counsel. Both appointments went into effect Feb. 5.

Both Wyshner and Sebold had been in their posts at Kyndryl since 2021, the year the company was spun off from IBM.


Business Optimization Plan

Reading the investors call transcript.

The CFO said the plan is going as expected and that the company should save around $490–$550 million.

What that actually means. When this plan was talked about before (back in May 2025), it was tied to cutting about 1,600 jobs worldwide. Those savings are still being worked through now.

The “one-third” comment, the CFO also said they expect to see about a third of those savings this year. That suggests the cost-cutting and likely the job cuts linked to it is still ongoing, not something that’s already finished.

So expect more layoffs soon.


Stoneridge CFO Matt Horvath Steps Down

Stoneridge, Inc. announced Chief Financial Officer Matt Horvath's resignation. His last day will be March 31, 2026. Horvath will pursue an opportunity in another industry. Robert Hartman, Chief Accounting Officer, will assist with the transition. Stoneridge has initiated a search for a permanent CFO.

More info here: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stoneridge-announces-chief-financial-officer-222000262.html


Cuts will be under the CFO...

The cuts will come from the CFO structure. GL takes the reigns in March. It gives them a perfect excuse to "clear house" because there is a new coach for the team. Just in time for May investor day. He will "see all the inefficiencies that the old CFO couldn't" and wants to make an impact so I will put my $5 on this bet right now.


Intel CFO

I don't get it, how is Dave Zinsner still CFO at Intel? This guy miss managed Intel Finances for the last 4+ years and yet he is still there! I don't get it. His latest comment is about miss reading (or underestimated) Server demand is just mind blowing.

This guy should of been kicked out back in December 2024, yet he is still here. Is the board filled with a bunch of circus clowns or something!.


Trading - Differentiation or Adding Volatility?

If integration is the strategy at Phillips 66, then the CFO is where that strategy either becomes measurable—or quietly unravels.

Under K3vin Mitchell, management has repeatedly emphasized the company’s commercial strength and trading activity as a differentiator—pointing to optimization, integration across assets, and value capture across the system. In public forums, Mitchell has framed this capability as a reason to maintain the current structure and as a contributor to long-term shareholder returns.

But the outcomes raise a fundamental question: if trading and commercial capability are truly differentiated, why does volatility keep increasing rather than declining?

Quarter after quarter, refining and commercial swings dominate results. Earnings remain highly sensitive to market moves, even as leadership points to trading activity as a source of advantage. At some point, “commercial optimization” stops sounding like a stabilizer and starts sounding like an explanation for risk that isn’t being actively constrained.

This matters because volatility is not an abstract concept—it is a capital allocation choice. Expanding trading activity without demonstrably reducing enterprise-level swings suggests either:
• the activity is adding risk rather than offsetting it, or
• leadership is comfortable with volatility that contradicts the integration narrative

Neither interpretation supports the company’s positioning as a diversified, disciplined platform.

The issue is compounded by management style.

Effective CFOs in complex organizations are not passive coordinators. They force clarity, resolve conflicts between segments, and actively develop leaders who can manage portfolio-level trade-offs. Here, leadership appears distant and conflict-avoidant. Hard questions linger unanswered. Exposure choices persist by default.

That combination—embracing volatility while avoiding confrontation—is dangerous in a company this complex.

Commercial trading can be a real advantage. But if it doesn’t visibly improve and smooth results, reduce dependence on refining swings, or produce superior risk-adjusted returns, it isn’t a differentiator—it’s just activity that comes at added expense.

A CFO doesn’t earn credibility by describing capability. They earn it by shaping outcomes.

Right now, Phillips 66 is getting more volatility than its strategy implies—and less leadership pressure than its complexity demands.


Board of Directors-sc-m of the earth

William H. Rogers Jr.: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Jennifer S. Banner: Executive Director, University of Tennessee Haslam College of Business.
K. David Boyer Jr.: CEO, GlobalWatch Technologies Inc..
Dallas S. Clement: President & CFO, Cox Enterprises.
Linnie M. Haynesworth: Retired Sector VP, Northrop Grumman Corporation.
Donna S. Morea: CEO, Adesso Group, LLC.
Charles A. Patton: Manager, Patton Holdings, LLC.
Jonathan Pruzan: Co-President, Pretium Partners (joined May 2025).
Agnes Bundy Scanlan: President, The Cambridge Group LLC.


Converse CFO - former CPO?

We are getting a new CFO over here at Converse. How was DS at Nike? Looks like he ran Procurement. Good experiences? Good culture? Bad experiences? Need the details before he ramps us here so know what to expect. Only thing I heard so far was he got rid of people when he joined and the org did not have much direction from him with a lot of people having left or trying to leave. I only know one Procurement person that is over there still so giving the benefit of the doubt maybe he inherited a bad gig?

Need some info before meeting him…