#layoffs

Posts mentioning hashtag #layoffs

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #layoffs.

Mention #layoffs in your post to continue the discussion!

Reliable reliable source

Spoke with a supervisor who confirmed today that layoffs are coming and also added that layoffs will be for managers and stores. Also layoffs will will happen before Nov 20. It was indicated some managers will be gone before then. They had meetings today and word is they will know on Friday.


Lets me suggest a plan please help this reach to Dan

I have a workable and thoughtful proposal, aiming to avoid layoffs completely while still achieving the desired cash flow for investment.
Here is a breakdown of the suggestion and some key aspects it addresses:
💡 Proposal Summary
• Goal: Avoid layoffs and fund a new investment.
• Method: Temporarily cut employee bonuses (10% to 50%) for two years.
• Investment: Use the saved bonus money to fund the project "Dan wanted to invest in."
• Incentive/Risk:
• Success: If the investment works after two years, the employees receive their deferred bonus money back as a lump-sum incentive for their sacrifice.
• Failure: If the investment fails, "Dan should accept the responsibility"
✅ Key Strengths of This Approach

  1. Layoff Avoidance: This is the strongest benefit, maintaining team morale and institutional knowledge.
  2. Shared Sacrifice: It frames the financial challenge as a company-wide effort, which can foster unity.
  3. Incentivized Risk: The promise of a repayment and potential "extra incentive" acts as a performance bonus for the overall company strategy.
  4. Accountability: The success or failure of the plan is tied directly to the leadership ("Dan") who proposed the investment, which could satisfy employees who are bearing the temporary cost.
    ❓ Considerations for Management
    While compelling, a management team would need to carefully consider the following details:
    • Legal/HR: The company would need clear legal agreements outlining the bonus deferral and repayment mechanism.
    • Employee Morale: Even with the promise of repayment, a 50% bonus cut for two years could lead to high-value employees leaving for competitors offering better immediate compensation.
    • Financial Math: They would need to ensure the 10-50\% cut actually yields enough cash to fully cover the required investment without jeopardizing other operational needs.
    • Definition of "Works": There needs to be a clear, measurable metric (e.g., specific ROI, revenue increase) defined now so there is no ambiguity about whether or not "Dan's plan" was successful two years from now.
    It's a creative way to turn a potential crisis (layoffs) into a shared, high-stakes investment with an immediate path to funding.

Even more cuts

The layoffs, which were first reported by Crain’s New York, were disclosed in a filing with the New York State Department of Labor. In total, 660 employees are being laid off by Amazon across nine offices in New York City.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/11/11/amazon-nyc-layoffs-restructuring-november-2025/87221740007/


A Late Fall Tradition

It is late fall in the United States. The leaves are changing, and the air has turned crisp. We begin to prepare for the holidays with family and friends. Christmas decorations come down from the shelves in the attic or garage. We make our homes—and sometimes our yards—festive, and we start our lists of gifts for loved ones. It is a magical time.

Oh… and Solventum begins its annual restructuring. It seems people are receiving their Christmas their pink slips from the water boy and his cronies today.

In ten minutes, we’ll get to hear how—with a little courage and some visionary leadership—we’re making the changes that will guarantee we stagger forward until the next layoff, which is in no way reassuring.


Trump on Fox: We have to bring in Talent, we don’t have it

Ingraham on Fox: “Does that mean the H1-B visa thing will be deprioritized for the administration”

Trump: “We you have to have Talent”

Ingraham on Fox: “Sir, we have plenty of Talent here in America”

Trump: “No, you don’t, no you don’t, no you don’t”

Ingraham on Fox: “We’ll how did we do it before - for the entire history of our nation?”

(300,000 more jobs are expected to be lost before end of year, brining the total loss to 1,500,000 net jobs loss in 2025).


Being honest gets you nowhere!

I was laid off Monday — in a 30-second phone call.

What doesn’t make sense is watching people with multiple ethics violations in a year keep their jobs. I guess being close with HR has its perks.

It’s frustrating when the people meant to protect confidentiality don’t, and when accountability seems optional. Those of us who try to do the right thing end up paying the price.

It’s disappointing, but my integrity is something no one can take from me. I’ll be okay — and I’ll always choose honesty over politics.


The Ellison clan is spreading their magic. :)

LE's son's acorn didn't fall far from the tree:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/600-paramount-skydance-employees-quit-instead-of-returning-to-the-office-and-it-cost-the-company-185-million-filings-show/ar-AA1QeuAq?uxmode=ruby&ocid=edgdhpruby&pc=DCTS&cvid=691415c2ca144a0197f8d3c562227e9a&ei=9

I wonder if LE is more interested in this industry more than high-tech.
The circus continues.


What truly caused this

The disaster that most everyone realized was coming is directly related to the hiring of executives, for lack of a better term, from Sweden, Ireland, India, and Canada. At least two have been under investigation of wrongdoing while being the head of other companies. The next part of the disaster is allowing HR to run the business with its innate stupidity. Another part of the mix is increasing prices and forcing someone within finance to manipulate the numbers by showing increased subscribers rather than terminations based upon the increase. Forcing out the knowledge base within the company. Offshoring customer service and everything else they could get their hands on. This CEO will do no better and the price increases will continue along with layoffs. When something this large is turned into such a mess, it will take a very long time to correct. One common theme that has existed for at least ten years is the executives do not want to hear the truth. Every negative is twisted, turned, and shined so the executives can continue to believe that they are the greatest.

This is from Wireless, but still very much true. OP is @f7+1k9q3zzfe.


We need more people

We’ve been asking for help for months. Now suddenly there are going to be more layoffs, and we could lose even more people? If that happens, I’ll quit myself. I’m already doing the work of three people. I can’t do any more. There aren’t enough hours in a day, and to be honest, I don’t want to. I’m done being treated like a robot and expected to do more with less all the time.


The ghost of past SWN wrongdoings is putting jobs in danger

Way and his band of merry VPs and directors are leaving us all in peril, one more time.

"The hack job they did during the merger have led to a wave of dissatisfaction among investors, who are now seeking their rightful compensation. It remains to be seen who will ultimately bear the cost of these developments". This is clearly a straightforward decision, and HR is well-equipped to handle the situation effectively.

Happy bean soup Thanksgiving and merry humble pie for Christmas, y'all!


Understanding Your Rights Under the WARN Act

If your employer fails to report layoffs to the WARN system, you may have grounds to take legal action. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires employers to provide 60 days' notice before mass layoffs or plant closures. If they do not comply, affected employees can seek compensation.

Steps to Take

  1. Confirm Eligibility
  • Ensure your employer has at least 100 full-time employees.
  • Verify that the layoffs affect 50 or more employees at a single site within 30 days.
  1. Gather Evidence
  • Document the details of the layoffs, including dates, number of employees affected, and any communications from your employer.
  1. Consult an Attorney
  • Seek legal advice from an attorney experienced in employment law. They can help you understand your rights and the potential for a class action lawsuit.
  1. File a Class Action Lawsuit
  • If multiple employees are affected, you can join together to file a class action lawsuit. This can help share legal costs and strengthen your case.

Potential Compensation

If successful, you may be entitled to:

  • Up to 60 days of back pay and benefits.
  • Additional damages if the employer's actions were willful.

Reporting Violations

You can also report WARN Act violations to the U.S. Department of Labor. They may investigate and enforce compliance, which can support your case.

Taking these steps can help you navigate the legal process if your employer fails to report layoffs as required by the WARN Act.


WARN Trigger November 6th layoff NJ

Anyone know how to find out how many people total (not names) were Surplus in the November 6th Layoff. Warn was not triggered but I know alot of NJ people like myself who were let go, trying to see whether total was over 50, have not signed my GR&W yet trying to see what is up with this first


COP flaunts Alaska Projects amidst large layoffs

"...ConocoPhillips is seeking to drill four exploration wells near its giant Willow discovery this winter, the plans show, marking its return to aggressive exploration in Alaska as construction at Willow progresses with first oil expected in 2029.

The work comes despite the company’s decision this year to cut its workforce globally, including in Alaska, amid low oil prices.

This winter’s program in Alaska illustrates ConocoPhillips’ commitment to the state...."

https://www.adn.com/business-economy/energy/2025/11/11/feds-release-conocophillips-big-winter-exploration-plans-in-alaska-as-critics-denounce-short-comment-period/


Have they gutted people at the Management/Director Level?

This is where the real corruption lies at Fannie Mae. I was in a department where most of the people were management level or above. A department with 30 plus managers 5 plus directors and very little worker bees. Management level and above had a country club mentality where they all protected each other. If they truly want reform at Fannie Mae that is who they should get rid of. A department usually needs 1 director not multiple directors.


Dan's Q3 call was well received here..what happened?

There was a lot of positive feedback to the CEOs blunt and honest call a few weeks ago, even with him flat out saying there would be layoffs and that his plan would be ready in 22 days...which put it right around the 20th.

What happened? Did people lose their minds or did this board suddenly get filled with dummies? I'm seeing a lot of comments from people who dont deserve any severerance.

It su-ks but buckle up and push on.