#leadership

Meta, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is continuing to shrink its workforce, like many of its peers in the tech industry. After laying off hundreds of employees earlier this week, a leaked document revealed the tech giant’s bizarre plan for several of its remaining staff as it shifts in a new direction.

https://www.thestreet.com/technology/leaked-meta-memo-reveals-companys-bizarre-plan-after-layoffs

Profits all go upstairs. We'll just keep getting cut like always.

Another week with almost no communication from leadership, just nonstop guessing and speculation about what’s coming next. I’m so tired of this. I’d honestly pay good money for leadership that respects its people enough to just tell the truth, even when it’s not what we want to hear.

The painful and sad truth is that Cisco has become a company run by financial managers and lawyers. Such a company has no chance of growing and being competitive at the crazy growth rate of the AI ​​market. The facts are that there has been no innovation at Cisco for a very long time, the company has been operating conservatively and cautiously, resting on its laurels, there is no risk-taking, no innovation, but rather maintaining the status quo. This is the truth that all need to understand and know about Cisco. All the other talks of the ELT are worthless.

The direction here changes every few months, so how are you supposed to feel confident about anything long term? Teams keep starting initiatives that never go anywhere before the next priority shift. That lack of consistency is ki-ling morale more than leadership realizes.

First time in many many years where the ALL HANDS WEB CAST was not posted on Bridge .... From what employees are saying the CEO was crying during the webcast and the company has disclosed any infomration stating that there is no recording for such . Can anyone confirm and or comment on this?

What is going on over there?? Constant back and forth on plans and resourcing. Even requirements above the 4 days/wk corporate standard to please BB. Sure seems like a lot of people leaving.

How the company plans to address its mounting liabilities remains unclear. At this point, only a dramatic shift in strategy (or perhaps a moment of radical clarity fueled by either opi--ds or OK homegrown ayahuasca ) seems capable of turning things around.

Jensen Huang runs Nvidia with 60 direct reports, how many does Sassine have?

ExxonMobil will be a case study for how not to do strategic workforce planning. All of the HR Talent management programs are being put together to deliver the lowest cost organization for the long term which is very different to an organization that can continue to deliver. Give it 5years and the organization will be unable to deliver. The HR Leadership team don’t realize the impact of losing our friends in Canada, Australia, UK, Malaysia, Europe and there’s more to come. India is the future but not going to deliver what the organization needs or wants. BIg bet is a gamble for the future. Get our now

What is likely to happen in the first 90 days of when the perm CEO arrives, big or small splash with a big webcast call or just a e-mail to all staff, any changes expected at the top or the way we work, as now only a few days away

I was reading the WSJ about Elon Musk and found this interesting:

“For Musk, that (his management philosophy) means latching on to one or two existential issues and riding them week after week.

“I used to sit in those meetings, saying I’m pretty dang sure that our competitors’ CEOs are not sitting in these weekly engineering reviews and not driving their companies as fast,” McNeill said. “Therefore we’re compounding an advantage against them.”

This is one of our issues: the most senior leaders at PSX show little to no interest in the existential issues that result in our underperformance. And they certainly are not willing to sit through meetings to help ensure that the issues are being worked. In fact, they struggle to stay awake during 30 and 60 minute meetings on issues of performance and ensuring priorities are being worked. Instead, they spend time having dinner with investors and the board.

If accurate there is a Big Payday headed for Bill and crew. It has just been leaked that Citi corp is considering buying Truist or PNC. My money is on Truist at a discount. Of course, executive leadership will be well compensated. That is not likely the case for the remainder of Bill’s “teammates.”

Or when the next round will hit, or how many they think it makes sense to cut. Leadership overextended. AI is a black hole they all fell into, and now they're operating on pure sunk cost fallacy. They may end up shooting themselves in the leg to save the arm. Basically, anything can happen in the near future, and none of it will be good for us.

All you need is charisma to lead when things are good. Things are not good and need to be led with tough decisions and swiftly.
For tech he needs to cut at least 2/3 of employees and give the remaining a 5% raise to get folks out of slump. Cut all the new or recently promoted leaders as well. They are not smart and useless. Run it on bare bones until things turn around.
I’m in tech so can’t speak for other areas.
Will be a big mistake with the stock so low if we come out of layoffs with only 500-1k gone.

Conestoga College recently laid off nearly 400 employees. This included 181 faculty members and 197 support staff. Some staff were also forced into part-time roles. Declining international student enrollment is a primary cause. The college is also undergoing a leadership transition.

Kitchener, Ontario

https://www.seekyoursounds.com/news/kitchener/another-round-of-layoffs-conestoga-college-400-full-time-staff-cut

WHEN WILL HE COME OUT NEW STYLE OF SHOES THAT REGISTER WITH PEOPLE!!!

Where is next AF1, AJ1, Cortez? Next Air technology or Air Max technology?

What is upper management doing? Other than figuring out how to cut the company and retreat!!!

If EH cannot provided any significant answer then he should go or PK should let him go

YETI now has a track record of annual layoffs around the February timeframe in the hopes of propping up the stock price, along with a revolving door of leadership for those unable to constantly be a "yes" person for a CEO, who has a constant fear of losing control while repeatedly implementing negatively disruptive changes and holding others to account for those decisions.

After riding out the usual industry cycles, one thing that keeps standing out is how the "We Lead" behaviors aren't just words on a slide deck. they actually shape how things get done day to day.

Even during last year's necessary adjustments, you could see it in action: leaders at every level stepping up with clear direction, owning outcomes, and keeping teams focused on what matters most. No panic, no mixed messages .. just steady, confident guidance that helped everyone stay aligned and move forward. It's the kind of strong leadership culture that turns tough moments into proof that the system works.
What's been especially noticeable since then is how things have sharpened and improved. The focus feels even tighter, collaboration is smoother, and there's a renewed energy around delivering results. Teams are moving faster with clearer priorities, and that consistent "We Lead" mindset: taking initiative, holding ourselves accountable, and supporting one another has really taken root in the day-to-day. It creates this quiet confidence and sense of shared purpose that makes the work feel more purposeful than ever.

Definitely one of the biggest reasons the Chevron culture feels special and worth staying for. Curious if others see the "We Lead" principles showing up the same way, especially in how the organization has come through stronger on the other side.

An all hands invitation was sent out this morning for April 1
GP and WP leaders on it and I hope that they have some information to share instead of an hour of word salad slop.

Dan’s story time is great for the stock price. I can’t wait to tell us more about AI and the future. Hopefully he gives out lolly pops.

I KNOW the marketing team sht a brick when the Aven Hospitality rebrand came out weeks before the Sabre rebrand...with the same color scheme, imagery, and style. What's funny, is they used the same agency, so they can't all play d-mb, right? The fact that millions went to an agency that just copied and pasted a different company's project and said "good enough" is insane. Once you add the similar logo from Sabre Industries - nothing is unique about the Sabre rebrand. In fact, just this morning I saw the Sabre Industries logo with a blue background and thought, "I don't remember blue being in the color palette with the burnt orange" cough* excuse me, terracotta.

Did we really bring in a CMO who thinks her sh*t doesn't stink to look like an amalgamation of other companies? It's time for her and her high and mighty constituents she brought over from TP to get going.

To get an idea for how far behind Intel is in AI, they still employ hundreds of secretaries. These are status symbols. They are so old fashioned on the inside. The leaders don't know how to schedule Outlook or create ai agent.

Oracle employees always seem to conveniently forget that Oracle is run by a malignant narcisist. Narcisists enjoy the chaos created by pitting their underlings against one another. This is a behavioural fact.

So stop with all the questions of why management does this or that. The answer is that this is Oracle's company culture; derived directly from the sick individual at the top.

Furthermore, it isn't just the hand-wringing of the poor ICs that he enjoys, but the same reaction is taking place through all ranks of management, with almost no exception.

Many big, successful companies take feedback from employees regarding their leaders.

Verizon has only a one-way survey—from manager to employee—and never from employees to managers or leadership.

Like Amazon runs frequent surveys to get:
• Team health
• Leadership effectiveness
• Workplace satisfaction

They make sure that if someone is polluting the culture, they weed them out. Verizon needs this urgently if Dan is dreaming of any transformation.

I'm considering a leadership position (band 9) at Lenovo in the LATC org.

Variable bonus target is 14% for this position, but I'm told the org performed well in the past and the bonus has been more like 20% for employees that meet expectations in the past few years. Given LATC was formed only a year ago, I'm guessing this stat is referring to the bigger org (perhaps the CTO org which LATC is under)

Can anyone at Lenovo confirm this stat? Can anyone confirm they got ~20% bonus for meeting or slightly exceeding expectations?

It is my understanding that the company is planning to lay off a significant number of employees who are directly responsible for day-to-day execution. In light of this, it would be advisable to also evaluate the structure and effectiveness of the senior management team.

A thorough assessment of management layers and their contribution to operational efficiency may help identify meaningful cost-saving opportunities. In some instances, organizations develop multiple layers of leadership that are not closely aligned with core business functions, which can introduce inefficiencies. Additionally, certain senior-level appointments made under prior leadership may warrant review to ensure alignment with current organizational needs and performance expectations.

It is also important to evaluate whether the addition of high-ranking, high-cost roles is delivering the intended improvements in efficiency and execution. A balanced approach that considers both leadership structure and frontline resources is critical to sustaining operational effectiveness.

From a customer perspective, there are growing concerns regarding execution timelines. Based on ongoing engagement with financial institutions across both the East and West Coasts, a consistent theme is that projects are taking longer than expected to launch. This may reflect an overreliance on layered management and delegation, rather than a streamlined, execution-focused approach.

Given the competitive landscape, these concerns are increasingly significant. Industry discussions indicate that organizations are actively evaluating alternative providers, making it essential to address efficiency, accountability, and delivery performance to maintain strong client relationships l,

Just because we were spared this time doesn’t mean we are out of the clear. Once this WB + Paramount merger happens we are ALL on the chopping block. This can’t be helped. Allow yourself to breathe a sigh of relief then start looking again. The battle has been won but the war rages on.

Clearly, David had no idea how widespread our network is and how crucial some remote workers are. Like literally frameworks, codebases, etc would fail overnight. This gives leadership some time to figure out Plan B.

Plan B will be what will happen in 2027. Buckle up.

Is ELT paying attention? Too much id--ts at leadership. Politics and favor is all their game torturing technically IC.

There is a fundamental disconnect between Dan’s stated ambition around AI-led transformation and the behavior being driven by current leadership.

Leaders are not just failing to prioritize upskilling—they are actively deprioritizing and, in many cases, dismissing learning initiatives as non-essential.
Immediate operational demands are consistently positioned above capability building, effectively preventing employees from investing in AI and future-ready skills.

I want to provide this feedback. Where can I provide that?

There is a pattern of behavior where the individual keeps project teams siloed and separated, while expecting everyone to remain aware of all activities. At the same time, information is selectively hidden within teams, creating confusion and lack of transparency.

Communication is often done in Hindi, which can exclude some team members from fully understanding discussions. The individual also appears to influence people to report directly to him, positioning himself as a central point of control. When status updates are requested, he tends to protect those who report to him, which encourages more people to align with him for safety.

Conversely, those who do not report to him are often put in a negative light—either blamed, overlooked, or set up in ways that impact their performance or perception. There are instances where opinions are shaped against certain individuals, affecting their growth, ratings, and opportunities. Senior leadership responsibilities such as supporting, mentoring, and enabling team success are not being fulfilled consistently.

This environment has led to decreased trust, lack of collaboration, and has been a contributing factor in multiple team members choosing to leave.

What if the board had chosen a qualified ceo instead of BDB?

Curious to see how team members in different locations feel about job security, leadership, future, layoffs, etcetera. India? Mexico? San Diego? Other locations?

How is the morale? It feels like rock bottom here in Denver. All the leaders in TX and completely disconnected from the business and staff.

Is there any org thats even half decent?
It used to feel the infrastructure, CTO architecture are the main incompetent organization. Now its all over in every LOB.

Widespread layoffs are happening due to poor financial performance, weak leadership, and an overhyped push toward AI from the CTO.

Another 2% down day. This on the news from one of our clients downgrading us. Do something Mike. Besides following Frank's layoff now and later plan.

I mean, it doesn’t make sense even from a leadership’s purely selfish perspective. Surely productivity has been suffering with all of us on edge all the time and completely demoralized?

Dan signed up for multi billion dollar transformation.

15k layoffs wasn't enough.

More cuts def coming and it seems like execs are getting real with their teams and just flat out scrutinizing everything.

The Sr Directors are also lacking one of the two main key skills. 1) leadership 2) technical knowledge.

Only a handful around that can do both. Can't grow a company if u are just one.

Thoughts?

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/occidentals-hollub-us-oils-most-powerful-woman-prepares-hand-over-reins-sources-2026-03-26/?fbclid=PAT01DUAQybWVleHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA81NjcwNjczNDMzNTI0MjcAAafvEuiIvnOvKTiucnWJcB1zyFCfbWHhW_KaX6Mmok57YQFFkEPot3kQ_x0FLA_aem_BAgLm0TWnrRFWSQ4s0hIsA

So this was just a “let’s sell you on AI” meeting?
This spin is infuriating. Don’t pi-s on my leg and tell me it’s raining.
AI already took jobs. Just because they were taken first doesn’t mean AI didn’t replace them. In a way I guess it’s true because those who are still employed just have the additional burden of trying to get the job done - until AI can learn. But leadership will keep repeating that it’s not taking jobs. Maybe if we keep hearing it we will believe it?
And are we really bragging that 3 employees were “repurposed” so people start feeling safe?
Just stop. It’s insulting.

Here’s what you can start doing:
Be honest about what the vision is for this company and who has a true future with Canon. Give people the resources to develop marketable skills and move on if your long term plan does not include them. People have families to raise.