Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #automakers.
Mention #automakers in your post to continue the discussion!
General Motors announced a new round of layoffs. This adds to ongoing workforce reductions across the Big Three automakers. Richard W. Paul & Associates launched "Big Three Retiree." This free platform offers resources for Ford, GM, and Stellantis employees. It helps workers navigate pensions, buyouts, and retirement planning.
Detroit, MI
https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/healthcare/articles/gm-announces-round-layoffs-michigan-183000073.html
The company is attempting to be hush-hush about this, but my (soon to be ex) co-workers are announcing on LinkedIn. Last day in the office is today for some.
This entire industry (ev charging) is cooked. All players are trying to get acquired by either an (ev) auto manufacturer or an energy company (like a Shell) increasing footprint in the ev charging space.
https://www.evshift.com/357031/top-6-biggest-chinese-suvs-coming-in-2026/
President Trump, please allow Chinese to sell cars in the US. We all want the Chinese vehicles, not the outdated US made vehicles.
Bill and Farley are reduced to begging…
Ford Motor and other U.S. automakers have asked for relief from aluminum tariffs after fires at a major American factory created supply bottlenecks for vehicles, though the Trump administration so far has rejected the requests, according to a report.
The Wall Street Journal first reported that Ford petitioned the Trump administration for assistance, citing people with knowledge of the conversations.
The government has so far not budged, the report said, adding that the discussions are part of ongoing talks about the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs.
Trump officials told the companies they had already received some relief from national security tariffs last year, when major automakers were allowed to recoup part of the 25% duties on auto parts, the report said.
Today was my last day in Enterprise Technology. I can't say I'm surprised, this position wasn't really right for me and I could see my own performance for what it was. Nothing unfair. I'm just curious if there's a trend going on in other parts of the company too.
"Ford said in December it would convert a Kentucky battery factory it had recently built with partner SK On to make batteries for energy storage."
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/15/ford-gm-tesla-energy-storage.html?msockid=136b0a7046ac65ab299a1d6647a964f2
After watching most major auto companies slash jobs, it was probably naive to think we’d avoid it. But 20 percent is steep. I guess we’ll see how it unfolds, though cutting staff to make up for tariff losses feels like the easy answer, not the right one.
on repairing all Fords vehicle recalls. That will keep Ford busy with endless business for years. That's where the real money is. Ford can also jack up the cost of repair parts by 125% to quickly increase profits. Say a much sought after Ford repair part currently costs 25 bucks. Well Ford could easily jack that repair part up to $56.25 and since its in deamnd people are going to pay it.
At the end of the last summer, my boat' motor was sputtering at full throttle. I'm not sure if its a throttle issue or something worst. Hoping to get it figured out and fixed myself. Because I don't want to splurge having to buy a new motor, because I think I'm going to get laid-off this year from my Ford job. Job wise, right now I'm feeling safe. So if my number comes up I'm thinking it will come up during layoff rounds this summer. I'm not going to worry about it so looking to get boat motor problem figured out and fix it so I don't miss the start of waterskiing. If anyone knows about boat motors sputtering at full throttle give me a holler.
Ford announced significant financial losses for 2025 driven by its struggling electric vehicle division, with the automaker projecting continued losses in the segment for at least three more years.
The New York Times reports that Ford Motor Company reported substantial financial losses this week, primarily attributed to its electric vehicle operations, as the automaker significantly restructures its EV strategy. The company’s electric vehicle division lost $4.8 billion in 2025 and is projected to lose between $4 billion and $4.5 billion in 2026, with profitability not expected until approximately 2029.
The announcement marks a dramatic reversal for Ford, which several years ago positioned itself as a leader among traditional automakers by rapidly introducing three electric vehicle models. The company hoped these vehicles would boost sales and increase profitability, but the strategy has instead resulted in mounting losses totaling more than $16 billion since 2022.
“We are now targeting break-even around 2029,” stated Ford CFO Sherry House, during a conference call discussing the company’s financial results on Tuesday.
The substantial losses prompted Ford to announce a major scaling back of its electric vehicle plans in December. The company ceased production of the F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck, abandoned plans to produce an electric truck at a facility under construction in Tennessee, and canceled development of an electric commercial van.
Breitbart News previously reported on the massive charges Ford took to restructure its electric vehicle division:
In a stunning blow to the U.S. auto industry’s ambitious EV plans, Ford Motor announced on Monday that it expects to incur approximately $19.5 billion in charges, primarily due to its struggling electric vehicle business. The staggering write-down marks the largest impairment taken by a company in Detroit’s history and underscores the challenges faced by automakers as they grapple with lackluster demand for EVs.
Faced with mounting losses totaling $13 billion in its EV division since 2023, Ford has decided to shift its strategy, focusing on bolstering its lineup of gas-powered vehicles while transitioning to hybrid and extended-range electric models that incorporate onboard gasoline engines. The move aims to pull back from loss-making assets and redirect capital to more profitable models.
As part of its revised strategy, Ford plans to manufacture a version of the Lightning that incorporates a gasoline engine capable of recharging the truck’s batteries while driving. The Tennessee factory will instead be used to produce gasoline-powered trucks, while a facility in Ohio will manufacture hybrid and gas-powered delivery vans.
Despite these cutbacks, Ford maintains plans to develop a medium-sized pickup truck with an expected price point of around $30,000. Scheduled for release in 2027, this vehicle will utilize new components and production methods that the company says will significantly reduce costs.
Breitbart News previously reported that the pickup truck EV project is considered so important by Ford executives that they compare it to the Apollo space missions:
During a conversation with automotive media at the Detroit Auto Show, Ford CEO Jim Farley offered new details about the company’s Universal EV Platform development, describing the initiative as one of the most challenging projects in his career. Farley compared Ford’s EV development to NASA in the Space Race: “This is literally like the Apollo or Gemini mission within Ford. A uniquely American, high-risk project… just like the power units for Formula 1, it’s one of the most challenging projects I’ve ever been involved in.”
The Universal EV Platform, which Ford announced last year, represents a significant strategic shift for the automaker as it works to create vehicles capable of competing with Chinese manufacturers on both technology and production costs. The platform is scheduled to debut in 2027 with an electric pickup truck built in Kentucky, with pricing expected to start around $30,000. According to reports, Ford plans to develop potentially seven additional vehicle variants using this same underlying architecture, including a midsize crossover.
Looking ahead, Ford expressed optimism about its financial outlook for 2026. The company projects its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, and other items will range between $8 billion and $10 billion this year, a significant improvement from the $6.8 billion reported for 2025.
As automakers back away from EVs, workers at newly converted plants are being shown the door. GM’s Factory Zero slashed staffing from 3,300 workers to about 1,000. Stellantis laid off 3,200 employees with a robocall, and Ford stopped electric F-150 production, leaving 4,000 workers waiting to see what comes next.
https://www.motorbiscuit.com/auto-company-laying-off-workers/
“Ford Motor Co. and China’s Geely Auto are in discussions about a potential partnership, eight people with knowledge of the ongoing talks said, as the world's carmakers look to share heavier technology and manufacturing costs.”
So, the Chinese can do better in Europe than Ford ever did. Not winning…
Eight Michigan employers announced plans for 1,707 layoffs in January. General Motors accounts for the largest portion, cutting 1,140 Detroit workers. GM cited a production schedule adjustment due to slower electric vehicle adoption. Other companies include UPS, Post Consumer Brands, Utz Brands, and Yanfeng. These job cuts are based on Federal WARN Act notices filed with the state.
https://www.mlive.com/news/2026/01/these-8-michigan-companies-planned-over-1700-layoffs-in-january.html?outputType=amp
General Motors Oshawa Layoffs Proceed January 30
General Motors confirmed 750 layoffs at its Oshawa assembly plant. These dismissals will occur on January 30, reducing the plant to two shifts. The company initially announced the shift reduction last May, citing the evolving trade environment. Layoffs were delayed from September due to high demand for Chevrolet Silverado pickups. Unifor blames US tariffs for the job losses, which also impact 1,500 supply chain workers.
https://eletric-vehicles.com/general-motors/gm-moves-forward-with-layoffs-in-canada-union-blames-us-tariffs/
2024 Expedition: Did Ford make an update lately to the battery mgt system that is causing all of these alerts? "Remote Features Disabled to preserve battery"
They're very annoying. Two year old battery and Ford says it is fine. Just drove 200 miles so battery should be fully charged. Two days later I get these messages again.
F
And it su-ks
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/ford-says-its-record-breaking-recall-year-is-actually-a-good-thing/ar-AA1TCIDq
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/ford-accelerates-global-layoffs-as-it-strategically-repositions-amid-shifting-ev-demand-and-market-volatility/ar-AA1Osivf
Engine recalls used to be the sort of thing most people never noticed unless they owned the vehicle in question. In 2025, they've become impossible to not notice. An absurd number of major recalls and federal investigations have centered not on software, airbags, or infotainment glitches-although there has been plenty of that-but on the most fundamental component of all: the engine.
Over the past year, more than five million engines sold in the United States have either been recalled or placed under official scrutiny. The brands, layouts, and customers differ, but the mechanical thread running through these failures is largely the same.
To meet fuel economy and emissions targets, modern internal combustion engines operate on razor-thin margins-manufacturers have pushed machining tolerances tighter than at any point in history while pairing those designs with ultra-low-viscosity oils such as 0W-20 and 0W-16.
From an engineering standpoint, thinner oil reduces parasitic losses and improves thermal efficiency. The tradeoff is that there is almost no tolerance left in margin to absorb any inadvertent contamination or variance during manufacturing.
In older engines, small amounts of residual debris from machining-metal shavings, casting sand, or abrasive material-could often be absorbed without immediate failure. When microscopic debris enters oil galleries in a modern engine, it will disrupt hydrodynamic lubrication almost immediately, accelerating wear on crankshaft journals, bearings, and connecting rods. Once that process begins, failure will arrive quickly and fiercely, without much warning.
GM's L87 V8 failures have been linked to bearing wear and crankshaft damage associated with metal debris. Interestingly enough, the L87 used in marine applications-like Nautique and Malibu ski boats-is spec'd with 10W-40 engine oil and hasn't experienced the same failures as in automotive applications.
Toyota's V6 issues trace back to machining residue that made its way into the crankcase. Honda has cited bearing and rod concerns, while Stellantis acknowledged the presence of sand from the manufacturing process in some engines.
These are not exotic or high-performance powertrains; they are mainstream engines built in large volumes. Engine replacements are among the most labor-intensive repairs a dealer can perform, often consuming 15 to 20 hours of shop time per vehicle.
Automotive News estimates that across the industry, the combined financial exposure from this year's engine recalls totals in the billions, with long-term warranty costs still to be determined. Never mind the incalculable damage to the overall brand-powertrain durability is foundational to brand reputation, particularly for trucks and large SUVs.
None of this suggests that modern engines are poorly built. On paper and on the road, they deliver more power, better efficiency, and lower emissions than their predecessors ever managed, but corners are being cut in the assembly process in the name of cost or efficiency. Maybe with a more relaxed regulatory environment, automakers will be able to bake in a bit more tolerance as a safety margin, that or like, go back to using 5W-20 engine oil.
Ford plans to hire 2,100 employees for the new iteration of the Glendale plant, and a company spokesperson said Monday that all those laid off will have the "opportunity to apply" for those new jobs.
https://www.wdrb.com/news/business/ford-will-lay-off-all-1-600-kentucky-battery-plant-employees-as-it-pivots-away/article_32ef2a58-eb9d-4bf4-820d-c2417b6793ea.html
Ford + Renault partnership for new small EVs in Europe only and the vehicles are schedule to hit the market in 2028. Like the VW partnership for the EV Explorer and Capri really did well. Late to the game in a market already being oversaturated by China.
CE1 is going full bore, Farley did not mention much about the Skunk during the townhall. Maybe his sweater was too tight?
Hybrids an EREVS were mentioned, which is logical.
Does Ford really think they can beat China so late to the race? Verstappen cannot even win this one!
I think we need to learn where and by whom these hinges were engineered. It's a HINGE, not rocket sceince. Does anyone know?
https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/ford-escapes-recalled-liftgate-hinge-issue
Look at JF's face when Trump mentioned the Kei cars from Japan.
https://www.youtube.com/live/2Ey5TwGj7Cc?si=uKjYUspqgokxp-ox&t=708
Ford batteries does not sustain more than 1 year, after that range of the battery is reduced badly. I bought mustang mach e. Car is good, features all are nice but now battery range went down also, charging time is unbelievably long. Why this happening ? I failed to understand . Why can't they improve the quality in existing cars and more reliability with reduced cost
Sort of...
https://www.youtube.com/live/6jmAVp418uM
I went in for an oil change at a Quick Lane last week and received an AI text from "Will" at the front desk. I was offered $11,500 for my 2020 Edge with 55K miles; go pound sand. Ford doesnt have a vehicle in their offering I would buy.
No way am I selling it so Ford can resell it on Amazon.
Lexus is the #1 as expected. Buick is #2, and you know why? Buick vehicles are designed and built in China, then shipped to the US. This proved that Chinese vehicles are far more better than the American US made vehicles.
Hot off the wire - cuts starting tomorrow in Model E.
Best of luck to you all. See you on the other side.
This man is a buffoon.
https://fortune.com/2025/11/12/ford-ceo-jim-farley-secret-education-path-c-suite-ceo-job-study-supply-chain-like-tim-cook/
Why in the world has he not been fired? FoMoCo will continue the downward slide. Saddening to watch.
More than 2,000 workers will soon be temporarily laid off at the Ford Assembly Plant in Louisville, a move expected to last about 10 months. During that time, the facility will undergo major changes as it transitions to building electric vehicles.
https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2025/11/09/uaw-local-862-resource-fair-
“Once hyped as a ‘smartphone that can tow,’ production of the money-losing EV pickup may be shut down for good.”
May be shut down…should have never been produced.
Of being canned!!
Still no line item for subscription sales, so we still are a vehicle manufacturer.
But of note, we’ve allegedly sold In Q3 2025 815,000 Ford Pro Intelligence software subscriptions. We’ve sold less than 84,000 Lincolns all year. Should Lincoln be cancelled to focus on selling subscriptions?
M&M sell vehicles at less than half the current prices - thank to AI tools... The buyers --- robots working in factories.... they will buy and drive.............
Joke ?
No income no buyer, no jobs ,,,, no market for the cars
one year of great profits and after that global recession..
The top software executive at GM resigned, hired from Apple two years ago.
Let us 🙏 Ford has former Apple people resigning.
Ford Motor Co. is planning to invest approximately 32.5 billion rupees (about $370 million) in India to produce new engines.
Thoughts?
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/29/gm-layoffs-michigan-ohio.html
Ford Gets a Correction to Our F-150 Lightning Story
Douglas A. McIntyre
Mon, October 27, 2025
Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) asked for a correction to our “Ford to End Production of Failed F-150 Lightning.”
Here is their correction:
F-150 Lightning is the best-selling electric pickup truck in the U.S. – despite new competition from CyberTruck, Chevy, GMC, Hummer and Rivian – and delivered record sales in Q3. Right now, we’re focused on producing F-150 ICE and Hybrid as we recover from the fire at Novelis. We have good inventories of the F-150 Lightning and will bring Rouge Electric Vehicle Center (REVC) back up at the right time, but don’t have an exact date at this time.
Here is our response:
Ford’s comment about the Lightning is a claim that it is good to be a 5 feet, 3 inches tall person in a room of people who are 5 feet tall.
For a start, the production information comes from The New York Times: “The company also said it has stopped making an electric version of its popular F-150 pickup.” That is in the headline about Ford’s earnings. In the body of their story: “Because of the fire and slowing sales of electric vehicles, the company has stopped making the F-150 Lightning electric pickup.”
Ford always stuns us when it talks about being first in the segment. The company took the brand of the top-selling vehicle in the past five decades and launched an electric version. Then it congratulated itself for selling only 85 of these a day through the first three quarters of this year. Thus, Ford took one of the greatest brands in auto history and turned it into a multibillion-dollar debacle.
Executive Chair Bill Ford told the Detroit News that the Lightning was the most important product of his career. He added, “Anytime you have a radical change to your most successful product, you really are betting the company.” I have not heard him say Ford lost that bet.
The company increased the price of the Lightning three times in 2022. Some of that was apparently because it did not anticipate “significant material cost increases.” One of the largest car companies in the world should have foreseen such a significant change.
Ford said it planned to build 150,000 Lightnings in 2022. And it said it would ramp to an electric vehicle (EV) production rate of 600,000 in 2023. Ford has only sold 69,000 EVs through the first three quarters of 2025. It will be lucky to sell 90,000 for the entire year.
Astonishingly, Ford is proud of being in first place in the electric pickup segment with nine-month sales of 23,034 Lightnings through the third quarter, up a staggering 1%. That’s a record to be proud of.