#headcountreduction

Posts mentioning hashtag #headcountreduction

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #headcountreduction.

Mention #headcountreduction in your post to continue the discussion!

DLs will be squeezed out

From what I am hearing, most of folks on ISP list will be DLs.

Given the objective of cascade 2 is to reduce leadership layers, it makes sense. GPs/Directors will save their skin and throw DLs under the bus.

Skills, capabilities and performance will not matter. If you are a DL and don’t have a GP/Director protecting you, your name will end up on the ISP list.


Any truth to 6k being a target?

This sounds a bit too much, but then again…

6k is 1/3. That’s the number. That gets the staffing to about 12k which is roughly half of what it was pre covid. That’s a huge reduction. With increasing output and content the goal is double the revenue of pre covid with half the staff. That’s how you turn a profit.
OP: @fh+1k2wpserx


showtime

I recently chatted with a friend who specializes in restructurings, and she shared some thoughts on reimagined.

The duration and scale of this consulting project indicate that the target for headcount reduction is more than 15%.

ISPs are probably going to lose access to their laptops within a week. The 60-day period to reapply for other positions is likely nonsense. Once ISPs are informed, they won’t want them snapping photos of sensitive client data and sharing it on the dark web.

They probably had an idea of who they were letting go back in January. Typically, leaders assess their employees based on current skills and their potential for retraining.

Despite all the dishonesty and deceit, my friend believes PP is doing well. Her aim is to boost GP profits, and cutting over 1000 jobs will definitely enhance GP returns.

Happy Hunger Games!


Heard through the grapevine that large cuts are coming next week. AGAIN

Sr. Director here.

Had my 1x1 with my SVP yesterday and was told that I likely will have to cut 5 people. I was told that this is company wide and most, if not all, departments and teams will be hit with a minimum of 10% for each team. Apparently it comes down to which is "cheaper" - cut ties with a vendor and get rid of a necessary tool, or cut people. In this case, it's sadly people. She couldn't tell me much but it sounds like it's supposed to be fairly big.