#wfh

Not sure about claims of RTO4 or loss of sabbatical but can’t explain $100 a share without the Street thinking we will cut costs hard

Because they don’t care about productivity, efficiency, collaboration, or the actual results of RTO. What they care about is pushing people to quit. Every RTO rollout, in every company, has always been about attrition first. RTO has been around long enough to know it doesn’t improve anything. If anything, it makes things worse. Except when it comes to driving people out. That part works perfectly.

So far, the only difference RTO has made in my life is more hours wasted commuting and higher expenses. I still haven’t met a single person I actually work with. Doubt I ever will. Any time I “gain” by not working late nights, I now spend stuck in traffic. I’d have more respect if they just admitted the real reasons. Because let’s be clear - this isn’t about collaboration and efficiency.

Didn't take long to figure out RTO was a losing mandate.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5412153-remote-work-reversals-state-government/amp/

I estimate that commuting three times a week is costing me approximately an extra $50 weekly, or $200 monthly. To make up for my increased expenses, I'm thinking about cutting back on some/all of the following:

• Christmas gifts for the family
• Contributions to my 401(k)
• Donations to the Elevance Health PAC
• Tithes to my church

What have others considered cutting back on?

I work at a PulsePoint location that lacks sufficient facilities, particularly meeting rooms. All Staff VPs have their own private offices with doors, yet the few small meeting rooms (designed for 1–2 people) are reserved exclusively for them. With the return-to-office policy now requiring three in-office days, there’s a clear shortage of spaces for quick meetings or 1:1s. It’s unclear why these additional rooms are restricted to Staff VPs when they already have dedicated offices—it just doesn’t add up. They don’t even need them but others are not allowed to reserve them!

Remote worker, just laid off, supposedly so they can use my headcount on someone in-office.

My manager is now spending several work hours each week driving to and from an office where none of their direct reports or other immediate team members are located. What a significant impact on people leaders’ ability to be available to and collaborate with those who need their time and support most! I hope leadership takes this loss of meaningful (and the most essential) collaboration into consideration as they contemplate the impact of this unnecessary requirement on people leaders, who in many cases are already burdened with far too many direct reports to be maximally effective. Now they have even less time to be available to those who depend on them the most.

New leadership believes developers are not able to complete deadlines at home. Prepare for a sweeping RTO mandate.

You don’t build culture with mandates and badge scans. We believed in connection and trust, and now it’s all about control. Starbucks used to feel different. Now it feels like we’re just being managed for show. You can’t force community. You have to earn it.

Every other reason is secondary, if there were ever any valid reasons to begin with. Commuting is manageable in some cases, unless we’re talking hours to and from the office. Relocation isn’t a real option. It’s extremely expensive, it disrupts the entire family, and you’re still at high risk of being laid off just months later. God knows how many more cuts are around the corner, or how this whole upheaval will play out.

Anyone hearing anything about the RTO changes coming? Supposedly soon…

Been at Medtronic 10 yrs and hired as a remote worker. Will they make me start going into the office ? I’ve never went in.

It’s been 8 months now for my group being in the office 5x per week. I’m curious what the metrics look like on what the improvements. have been. Has it been effective? Is the company more efficient? Other than more people than normal retiring or leaving the business, has it made anything better? I’m still not seeing these big collaboration meetings. Nobody meets in person.

We are now ranked #3. Previously we were #1. Verizon’s revenue exceeds ours and T mobile is catching up. Both companies are still fully remote btw.

Anybody else see this around PDC this morning? Can't say I disagree. Curious if leadership will actually address this point at the all hands?

We’ve been told repeatedly that outcomes matter more than optics — that it's not about how much work we do, but what we deliver.

This year, we delivered. The metrics are green. The progress is real.

So why the sudden shift in remote work policy? If collaboration or performance were truly suffering, wouldn’t that show up in the results?

If outcomes are the true north, then let’s operationalize that: allow teams or individuals who consistently meet or exceed goals to retain flexibility in how they work. Reward results, not physical presence.

Ultimately: is leadership more focused on where we work, or what we achieve?

So is the announcement of RTO aimed at further reducing headcount? Not sure what to make of it?

What’s Dell going to come up with next to get rid of as many of us as possible, by any means necessary? They keep creating an environment that no one with talent and options would want to stay in. It’s like they’re daring people to leave. So what will it be this time that triggers the next wave of resignations and drives out even more of the best people we have left?

Never stepped foot in the office. Pretty sure I’m on a list somewhere, but I’m not wasting 2+ hours a day driving just to sit in a ghost town.

Fire me if you want, I’m not quitting like you want me to:)

Is LBT trying to save management role in Intel?

Per Yahoo Finance: Nearly 9 in 10 CEOs said in a 2024 survey that they “will reward employees who make an effort to come into the office with favorable assignments, raises, or promotions.”

Lol