Thread regarding HCSC (Health Care Service Corporation) layoffs

Already reposted the job many of us were let go for

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/4336218015/?trk=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-primary_job_list-0-jobcard_body_15410528500&refId=NPp%2B27WXsygWNPJyBEeg5Q%3D%3D&trackingId=4nLchv%2FF4FyNcFQXbWLQxw%3D%3D


by
| 2793 views | | 14 replies (last November 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ka9ezgqj

14 replies (most recent on top)

@20d pretty sure it’s medical leave - for example, I had been on medical leave and was laid off…I’m also older, higher in my salary band, and was there over 10yrs…probably checking all the consultant boxes to get canned!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @228+1ka9ezgqj

@bx please define what you mean by “medical” thanks!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @20d+1ka9ezgqj

And here’s / the sting…. There is a clause that Boston Consulting Group added to the severance recommendations. Do not rehire an HCSC employee within 1 year of termination from a RIF. Please note this did not apply to Cigna people. Notice they are not here complaining any more. Extra dose of cruelty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x7+1ka9ezgqj

@c4

They're not cutting 400+ jobs and reviewing the contributions of the whole company to determine who should be let go. The people making these decisions are looking at reducing company overhead. Nothing more, nothing less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1ka9ezgqj

@ba no

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1ka9ezgqj

@bx There’s a non-disparagement clause in the severance agreement, they literally have to say it wasn’t performance related.

You think they’re letting their top performers go to save a few bucks on people at the top of their salary bands and then have to go through the expense of rehiring and dealing with the onboarding performance ramp?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1ka9ezgqj

@bw it was NOT based on performance. It was age, salary and medical. No one laid off was on corrective action.

Hcsc su-ks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1ka9ezgqj

@OP this must be humiliating. So they just wanted to replace you because you weren’t good at your job?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1ka9ezgqj

@ba untrue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1ka9ezgqj

Is it true a majority of the people let go were return to office offenders?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1ka9ezgqj

@b3 visit this site multiple times a day from the office, then let us know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1ka9ezgqj

@az What difference does it make if they know you are on this site?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1ka9ezgqj

Don't go to that link. It's a trap. HCSC can capture your IP address and know you came from this site.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1ka9ezgqj

So they did need the role, they just didn’t want you for some reason?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1ka9ezgqj

Post a reply

: