Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Caleb D surpluses

Those impacted in Caleb’s org - were you told that it is strictly due to your location? Any other reasons given?


by
| 2072 views | | 8 replies (last November 12) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k9txrarb

8 replies (most recent on top)

Haven’t you heard? Location, Location, Location is what counts!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dd+1k9txrarb

“Dallas employees were impacted and so were some high performers.”

You can’t just live in or move to Dallas and not produce. If you are doing the bare minimum and not performing, you will be targeted

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @da+1k9txrarb

It wasn’t just location or performance. Dallas employees were impacted and so were some high performers. Some was due to location, some was just your role was eliminated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1k9txrarb

Only "ringers" were affected.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1k9txrarb

@a6 I’m not at a “hub” location and was not impacted..so how true is your statement?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1k9txrarb

Yes, it was a hub vs non hub location. My manager told me that while we had lunch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k9txrarb

Good luck finding a job if you need one in this country the economy sux

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k9txrarb

These were underperformers with lower rankings by supervisors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1k9txrarb

Post a reply

: