#stakeholders

I am dreading going back to work. Verizon Business su-ks a-s. They are fleecing R2B because they couldn’t manage other areas of the company better. They are paying us peanuts in Florida. No increase in wages and 3 times the workload. They increased commissions at risk but also increased the quota. They are stealing from us by not giving a healthy base salary. 100’s are considering or jumping ship. That’s going to hurt Verizons subscriber base because new people won’t have the relationships or experience. They will have a net loss of 500,000 - 1,000,000 business subscribers next year and pickup billions in equipment debt trying to win new customers. They are in the whole bad bad bad. It’s only going to get worse for Verizon Business, Business Owners, and Stakeholders.

If you are jumping ship to AT&T, they are asking for 30/60/90 day plan which includes your major accounts, stakeholders, and most wanted accounts. Do not give up your sensitive information and easily hand them your sources. They are just farming the intel from your market and most likely won’t hire you. So, if they are abusing you from the beginning guard yourself by being vague and do not include actual contact info of stakeholders. Like companies they might not know about.

What’s the over/under on Kimmeridge getting all their demands? Seem to have a good track record with influencing other institutional investors

Looks like Verizon is serious to improve its image and how it’s getting perceived by stakeholders and customers

Someone is a doggie lover. It's not dog food, it's food food. Capital Management increased stake in Freshpet by 13% recently. Since the move, FRPT is down 12%. Checkout Marketbeat.com. Revenues are down. Why buy individual stocks anyway. Risks too high. Use AI.

US has no choice but to help Intel turn around its business in the hope that it will provide chip manufacturing security against China. Without the full details of the stake, we can only speculate what stipulations the US gov’t has imposed on Intel, if not talks are still on going - but…IFS and ProdCo split is likely going to get more pressure. Chip manufacturing is US top priority, chip design is aplenty. This is a boon for IFS since the gov’t could help in many ways to get the customers it badly needs. For ProdCo, it cannot stand alone and it has to find a host to attach - hello Qualcomm!
But before this happens, big internal battle is being played out. NS will not concede without exhausting every tooth and nails. Good luck!

This is for the haters, trolls and non believers. So, Read it and weep Trolls. Just the facts!!! The are outsourcing risk and compliance rolls! Lots if UGLY TRUTHS. Any other employee would have been fired. Keep driving this FAKE NARRATIVE of making progress.

Here is PROOF!?? Link to pdf:
https://pdfserver.amlaw.com/legalradar/pm-50684461_complaint.pdf

Below is a blip of what is contained in the filing.

“87. The March 2020 Congressional report also faulted the Board of Directors for allowing management to "repeatedly submit materially deficient plans in response to the Consent Orders." Report at p. 36. It noted that Wells Fargo submitted multiple deficient plans that required board review and with regards to plans required by the
OCC, board approval) in response to the 2016 Sales Practices Consent Orders. The Committee staffs investigation revealed that the CFPB and OCC repeatedly rejected the Bank's compliance and redress plans required under the 2016 Sales Practices Consent Orders as incomplete or otherwise deficient. The Report noted that Wells Fargo's Board was directly involved in the process and was specifically told what needed to be done to comply with the consent orders. 27

88. The Federal Reserve's staff even held one-on-one sessions with several of Wells Fargo's directors. 28 Still, the Board of Directors failed to ensure compliance with the consent decrees. For example, on April 3, 2018, Wells Fargo made its first submission of plans for board effectiveness and risk management under the 2018 Federal Reserve Consent Order. "Despite receiving consistent direction from Federal Reserve staff on what sufficiently detailed plans should include, Wells Fargo's first submission of plans for board effectiveness and risk management, made on April 3, 2018, fell woefully short of the Federal Reserve's expectations."29 In a May 7, 2018 response letter, Federal Reserve staff informed Wells Fargo that its submission was so "materially incomplete" that the plans, "cannot be evaluated by [Federal Reserve] staff.”

Brrr, BBrrrr….. oh wait, I think someone is Scharting their pants right now.

Everything posted here is public information.

#WFC
#SEC
#WELLSFARGO
#layoffs
#Banking
#2023
#Fargo
#WELLSFARGOBANK
#FINANCE
#DIVERSITY
#Technology
#Bank
#Assetcap
#Brokers
#Investing
#FACTS
#WELLSFARGOPROBLEMS
#BOD
#CEO
#HIRING
#ETHICS
#Risk
#DE&I
#Compliance
#News
#2023
#2024
#Shareholders
#stakeholders
#Awareness
#Banks