Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Nike prioritizes being agreeable over capable

Over the last decade, this company shifted more and more toward hiring and promoting people who are friendly and easy to manage, instead of those who are smart and willing to challenge the status quo. Anyone who asks tough questions or push for better ways of working are immediately labeled as difficult and punished, while yes-people are rewarded. This is exactly why you hear less debate, see less accountability, and see fewer ground breaking ideas. Maybe it’s time to recognize that agreeableness is not the most valuable trait for a company’s success.

Related note, but toxic positivity is also overwhelmingly present here.

by
| 8 views | | 6 replies (last 7 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kywt9d2n

6 replies (most recent on top)

Exactly. A large chunk of the current cohort of leaders have no idea how to handle conflict. Any push back is perceived as an attack to their fragile egos and is answered with retaliation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1kywt9d2n

what you’re describing is, in my view, the reality for a huge number of employees at Nike. Years of poor leadership and fear-based management have created a culture where people keep their heads down because speaking up can come with real consequences. Too many employees have learned that challenging decisions, questioning leadership, or criticizing the innovation organization isn’t worth the risk to their careers. I saw it firsthand. In my own experience, after challenging what I believed were unfair performance ratings and a token 1% raise with my manager, I was terminated shortly afterward. Whether intentional or not, that’s the message people receive: stay quiet, or you may be next.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1kywt9d2n

My org is full of yes men with the brownest noses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kywt9d2n

It's a lot easier for those coasting if they don't have to change anything or do anything different.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1kywt9d2n

Agree 100%. Toxic positivity is the exact term to describe it. That was one of the primary reasons I quit after 4 years and went across the river.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kywt9d2n

@OP AMEN! You nailed it! We can’t challenge the why and new ideas = a threat. The culture of toxicity is all related to this = stagnant outcomes! Too many egos.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1kywt9d2n

Post a reply

: