Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

We knew it was bleak but doing the math make me even more sad...

Looking at the 146 jobs open today, only 18% are US based and 5 of those US based jobs are mariners and a pilot. We all know the reality, but seeing the actual numbers is pretty sad for a company that once prided itself on its US legacy/heritage.


by
| 1 view | | 14 replies (last 3 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kv3y1vat

14 replies (most recent on top)

@2sj
I think you mean, hire Indian pilots for Rupees

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vt+1kv3y1vat

@sj - The Gulfstream captains are PSG-26.
The Praetor captains are not PSG-26. Think international versus domestic, the bigger the metal the bigger the pay.
@P4 - Aviation has always had turnover, like a revolving door installed at their facility. The old saying is if you can fly at Chevron, you can fly anywhere. Chevron looks good on a resume due to the complexity of the international trips and perceived austere locations.
In 2025 and 2026, Chevron has simply lost Bay Area pilots that did not want to relocate to Houston but were under a retention bonus to stay through 2025. Losing the management pilots is not a bad thing nor unexpected. When people don't move their families, they probably aren't staying. Throw in one termination in the mix and one pilot who actually moved, resigned to go back to his former employer. Nothing in 2026 is surprising and now local Texas pilots are finding employment opportunities with Chevron. Move the company, not everyone follows.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2t3+1kv3y1vat

Pilots are well paid as well, like PSG27 or something. Why don't we hire Indian pilots for peanuts?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sj+1kv3y1vat

@rm why wait. I tell them to get out now. Why waste years in a company that won’t invest in you. Use that time to build a future somewhere else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qz+1kv3y1vat

What is up with aviation?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2p4+1kv3y1vat

@qn
Update: Make that 6 pilots have resigned this year. The Chief Pilot has resigned now too. Chevron normally has about a dozen or so Gulfstream qualified pilots on staff and now 50% have resigned/left since March. Oh well, one less pilot Chevron pays to commute. If you can manage people and you can fly, please apply.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jm+1kv3y1vat

Chevron hiring a US based pilot is not unusual. This year alone, 5 pilots have resigned, including the aviation department manager and a fleet captain. Either by resignation or termination, 3 pilots departed in 2025, 1 in 2024, 3 in 2023, 2 in 2022, etc. The company still pays for several Bay Area pilots to commute to Houston after a retention bonus to remain with the company through 2025. And for the first time that anyone can remember, the GM is not a pilot. If you can fly, apply.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qn+1kv3y1vat

@ns
you can believe that , "Stephen Miller .... (and) the Department of Labor " already know what is happening. They are completing okay with H1B contractors taking away USA job positions. It keeps the wages lower

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rp+1kv3y1vat

@fj
Good for you to help the Young graduates to run away from Chevron. I would be so disappointed to hire in to Chevron and see the suture only after you get su-kered in. I talk to the Horizons folks in the USA and many are very disappointed, I tell them to get their (3) roles to learn what they want to do and plan an exodus after they clear 5 years. Even the Israelis escaped from the Pharoah

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rm+1kv3y1vat

Companies want US dollar profits with 1/10 the pay expense in India or some poor country. Should we notify Stephen Miller before the Department of Labor catches on belatedly 5 years later?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ns+1kv3y1vat

There are zero jobs in Australia, besides intern positions.

And as someone deeply tied in with the local universities, I am letting any potential intern who will listen to run a mile from Chevron. Far better options exist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fj+1kv3y1vat

That’s awesome! So there must be a bunch of lush ex-pat openings in Thailand, Singapore, etc?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fc+1kv3y1vat

OP
The days of US based employees are over. The best people can hope for is keeping their U.S. based position until the next layoff.

I did hear feedback from multiple sources that the Engine staff are not meeting the ELT expectations.

Cheaper is not always better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1kv3y1vat

Just think about how hard it was for job owners to justify a US based employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1kv3y1vat

Post a reply

: