Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Get rid of EMTEC phDs

Stubborn, zero business acumen, dishonest , intolerably arrogant

Yes it is is difficult to stand the above qualities, and even harder when they add no value to the bottom line, do easy work stuck in a corner in their lab ir on their big screen monitors.

And yes research helps us have talking points for investors but largely it is a waste of money. Nothing to show for, failed projects don’t help build any i ternal confidence either.

The most toxic individuals I have worked with in exxon have been part of the research company, specifically Upstream Research Company. They’ve spent billions knowlingly on failed projects. It is even true today, an internal audit must be done on the valuation claims of all Upstream projects, they are inflated numbers.


by
| 2646 views | | 18 replies (last January 19) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kdzt1s20

18 replies (most recent on top)

@bb i witnessed the waste of money in Clinton, projects they knew would never be commercialized, site is totally corrupt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qk+1kdzt1s20

@rp Amen,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qj+1kdzt1s20

For layoffs:
Start with the PhDs who were hired and worked at CSR (Clinton, NJ), former URC, and recently LCS. These three organizations hired and empowered some of the most incompetent technical people who do not want to do real work. Even in low level toxic management roles, employees from these organizations continued to create toxic unhealthy work environment for everyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rp+1kdzt1s20

@n7 What did Biden have to do with your wife leaving you?

Answer: little to nothing.

The older people get, the more they watch cable news, and the more politicized they become.

IDGAF who wears a mask and who doesn’t. Got my vaccines so I’m good.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @na+1kdzt1s20

What does Trump have to do with EMTEC PhDs? Most of them are still wearing masks to work.

And at least half of them come in three days a week….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n7+1kdzt1s20

@f3 That doesn’t mean what you think it means.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fh+1kdzt1s20

1000% agreed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1kdzt1s20

@bc All the havoc that DJT, Musk unleashed in 2025 in the name of DOGE, will unfortunately have long term consequences for a lot of Americans. Starting with medical research & treatment including cancer. But hey, MAGA!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1kdzt1s20

It’s ok to admit you fell for the con. China, Russia and India are laughing at us now. Our leaders our so easily bribed, just distract them with shiny new objects.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1kdzt1s20

@b9 It was DOGE that ripped all the federally funded research programs to shreds, along with an avalanche of executive orders and firings of highly qualified scientists at the beginning of 2025.

Chances are you supported this on some level, so you can stay quiet and let it happen. #FAFO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kdzt1s20

@b0 A lot of private sector research is outsourced to non-profits and universities. There tends to be a larger delta between profits/expenditures when this approach is taken because it keeps labor costs low.

I’ve observed several instances of people with PhDs having issues taking correction/guidance, and also with functioning as part of a business unit. I’ve seen it enough to where I won’t hire one as a FT-W2. Ever. The better the school they came from the worse the problem is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1kdzt1s20

This is how America gets left behind. Our research institutions used to be the envy of every other country. You want China holding you hostage with their technology? I always the anti science anti education crowd was a vocal minority. The right has lost its mind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1kdzt1s20

@at They don’t need to steal the archaic, barely functional technology that most oil companies use.

Depending on the field/industry they’re easily 5+ years ahead of the U.S. this is especially true for Artificial Intelligence.

Watch less Fox/OANN.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kdzt1s20

@OP I actually agree.

I’ve never met or worked with someone who holds a PhD who was capable of taking correction or admitting that they were wrong.

To be fair, there’s plenty of people who don’t hold PhDs who have the same issues.

I have a masters FWIW.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kdzt1s20

@af your logic makes zero sense. You are saying research doesn’t result in good earnings so you have to license in the technology. But how did the third party make money doing said research? If no one did any research, there would be no big advancements to carry a corporation forward.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1kdzt1s20

@af and guess where the chinese are stealing that technology from?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1kdzt1s20

If you calculate the NPV on Upstream, Downstream, and Chemical Research and Development projects, you will realize that the NPV is "zero" or "negative".

Why? Spending money on research projects for twenty years before something is commercialized seldom generates sufficient cash flow for the next twenty years to make up for the "sunk" research and development costs.

It is far more cost effective to license the technology, process, or catalyst from a 3rd party company especially technology companies in the Peoples Republic of China.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kdzt1s20

Not my experience at all. What job family do you work in? Many of the principals and senior principals come from the old URC organization and are highly regarded across industry in presumably other job families. But those were the ones hired 20+ years ago, not the current batch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kdzt1s20

Post a reply

: