Thread regarding GlobalFoundries layoffs

ONEGF Survey is live (Big One)

If you are a new or old employee you should have received an email from
-Microsoft Viva Glint- for this anonymous survey. There are 30 questions total that have ratings on a 1-10 scale (1 meaning strongly disagree, 10 meaning strongly agree) you can add comments to each question rating as well. Keep in mind you can accidentally out yourself if you comment something that your manager knows it is a subject that you in particular talk about. While there are anti retaliation policies at GF that will not stop management from trying to figure out who wrote which comment.

Here is your one chance to make changes in your department. If you feel like your voices are ignored and feedback is brushed aside answer honestly and rate 1's. Managers with low ratings on this survey get put under an HR microscope, too many unhappy employees will cause action to be taken based on how many employees are unhappy.

If you don't have an issue with your department or manager then still make sure you voice that in the survey and give them a good rating. Good managers and leadership are hard to come by and employees do not get too many chances to have a say in their environment.


by
| 1752 views | | 11 replies (last October 21) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k5ahzmja

11 replies (most recent on top)

As expectd, the survey confirmed, No one would recommend GF as a great place to work if the person is serious about actually working.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @56k+1k5ahzmja

GF survey tip: Clusters matter, not one-offs. What flags attention is clusters of 1s.

  • Q1–5 = exec leadership (VP/GM trust & direction)
  • Q6–12 = culture (respect, pride)
  • Q13–17 = career (growth)
  • Q18–23 = your director/manager (resources, balance, engagement)
  • Q24–27 = pay/fairness
  • Q28–30 = strategy

1 = negative, 7 = positive, 4/5 = neutral.

  • If your issue is with execs → hit Q1–5.

  • If it’s with your director/manager → hit Q18–23.

  • Disengaged overall? Mark low on Q6–17.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @va+1k5ahzmja

Survey Rating Scale

  • 1 = Worst → Use this if you want to send a negative signal. It’s the clearest way to flag dissatisfaction.
  • 7 = Best → Use this when you want to highlight something positive. It shows strong approval and helps balance your voice.
  • 4 or 5 = Neutral → Use this if you don’t want to signal one way or the other. It’s basically a “no comment” middle ground.

*Avoid all 1s or all 7s. If you score everything the same, it looks like one disgruntled (or blindly happy) employee and is easy to dismiss.**

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v9+1k5ahzmja

@ew+1k5ahzmja

It’s not “has beens” it’s “has no choice” they are all folks who go forced out or fired from their previous jobs. No one willingly or wants comes to GF. It’s a refugee camp for the outcasts that can no find a job anywhere else

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sw+1k5ahzmja

Give low scores - this only time you can get back at inept and incompetent mgt. and tell your peers and friends too. Spread the word. Maybe we can get rid of some of bullsh-t artists in leadership positions!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sv+1k5ahzmja

@ew October 29, 2013Plano, TXDocument and Benefit Fraud
Indian corporation pays record $34 million fine to settle allegations of systemic visa fraud and abuse of immigration processes
PLANO, Texas – Infosys Limited, an Indian company involved in consulting, technology and outsourcing, has agreed to a record $34 million civil settlement based on allegations of systemic visa fraud and abuse of immigration processes, and also agreed to enhanced corporate compliance measures. The $34 million payment made by Infosys as a result of these allegations represents the largest payment ever levied in an immigration case.

This settlement was announced by U.S. Attorney John M. Bales, Eastern District of Texas. This case was investigated by special agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service, and by attorneys from ICE’s Office of Principal Legal Advisor.

Infosys is located in 30 countries and in 17 U.S. cities, including a location in Plano, Texas. The Plano location is responsible for handling the immigration practices and procedures for U.S. operations of Infosys. Infosys brings foreign nationals into the United States to perform work and fulfill contracts with its customers under two visa classification programs relevant to this matter, H-1B and B-1.

The H-1B visa is a strictly regulated visa program that protects the American worker from unfair competition from overseas countries that have drastically lower labor wages. The H-1B visa allows employers to temporarily employ foreign nationals needed for certain specialty occupations. The H1-B visa also protects foreign workers and mandates that they must be paid fair wages while working in the United States. H-1B visas are limited by congress to 65,000 visas nationally per year.

However, there is no limit to B-1 visitors. And the B-1 visa program only allows foreign nationals to temporarily enter the United States, for conferences, seminars, and the like. B-1 visa holders are not allowed to work in the United States. Infosys unlawfully and fraudulently used B-1 visa visitors as though they were H-1B workers in violation of U.S. immigration law.

According to court documents, the government alleged instances of Infosys circumventing the requirements, limitations, and governmental oversight of the H-1B visa program by knowingly and unlawfully using B-1 visa holders to perform skilled labor to fill positions in the United States for employment that would otherwise be performed by U.S. citizens or by legitimate H-1B visa holders. The government also alleges that Infosys violated U.S. immigration laws to increase its profits, minimize costs of securing visas, increase flexibility of employee movement, obtain an unfair advantage over competitors, and avoid tax liabilities. Following are the specific allegations:

Infosys fraudulently used B-1 visa holders to perform jobs that involved skilled labor that were instead required to be performed by U.S. citizens or legitimate H-1B visa holders.
Infosys submitted "invitation letters" to U.S. Consular Officials that contained false statements regarding the true purpose of a B-1 visa holder’s travel to deceive the U.S. Consular Officials and secure entry of the visa holder into the United States. These letters often falsely stated that the purpose of travel was for "meetings" or "discussions," when the true purpose was to engage in activities not authorized under a B-1 visa.
Infosys directed B-1 visa holders to deceive U.S. Consular Officials, including providing specific instructions to avoid certain terminology, to secure entry of the visa holder into the United States. Infosys created a "Do’s and Don’ts" memorandum that it provided to foreign nationals entering the United States on a B-1 visa that included the following directions: "Do not mention activities like implementation, design & testing, consulting, etc., which sound like work"; "Also do not use words like, work, activity, etc., in the invitation letter"; and "Please do not mention anything about contract rates."
Infosys told its foreign nationals to inform U.S. Consular Officials that their destination in the United States was the same as that provided in the Labor Condition Application, notwithstanding the fact that Infosys knew that the destinations had changed.
Infosys wrote and revised contracts with clients to conceal the fact that Infosys was providing B-1 visa holders to perform jobs that involved skilled or unskilled labor that were otherwise required to be performed by U.S. citizens or required legitimate H-1B visa holders.
Infosys concealed the fact that B-1 visa holders were performing jobs that involved skilled or unskilled labor that were otherwise required to be performed by U.S. citizens or legitimate H-1B visa holders. Infosys billed clients for the use of off-shore resources when, in fact, work was being performed by B-1 visa holders in the United States.
Infosys failed to maintain I-9 records for many of its foreign nationals in the United States in 2010 and 2011 as required by law, including a widespread failure to update and re-verify the employment authorization status of a large percentage of its foreign national employees.
The settlement agreement requires Infosys to pay $34 million to the United States. This agreement was largely predicated on Infosys’s cooperation with the United States during the investigation and on compliance measures taken by Infosys in the areas of B-1 and H-1B visas and I-9 documentation, both prior to and during the course of the investigation. The settlement agreement requires additional auditing for I-9 forms, a reporting requirement for B-1 usage, an agreement to continue to use only detailed invitation letters, and the continued use of corporate disciplinary processes for employees that violate the immigration laws of the United States.

"We will not tolerate actions that mislead the United States and circumvent lawful immigration processes, whether undertaken by a single individual or one of the largest corporations in the world," said U.S. Attorney Bales. "The H-1B and B-1 visa programs are designed and intended to protect the American worker; and we will vigorously enforce the requirements of those programs."

David M. Marwell, special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations in Dallas, concurred: "This settlement against Infosys is the largest immigration fine on record. The investigation indicated that Infosys manipulated the visa process and circumvented the requirements, limitations, and governmental oversight of the visa programs. The investigation also showed that more than 80 percent of Infosys’s I-9 forms for 2010 and 2011 contained substantive violations. Ultimately, these actions by Infosys cost American jobs and simultaneously financially hurt companies that sought to follow the laws of this nation. Companies that misuse the visa process can expect to be scrutinized and held accountable."

The investigation and settlement also earned the praise of George M. Nutwell III, special agent-in-charge of the Houston Field Office of the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service said that: "The Infosys investigation illustrates the unique role that DSS plays in investigating complex visa fraud cases that reach far beyond U.S. borders. DSS collaborates with our law enforcement partners and is committed to investigating and bringing to justice those who violate the law."

This case was investigated and the settlement negotiated by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Shamoil T. Shipchandler, Alan R. Jackson, and J. Kevin McClendon, and attorneys from ICE’s Office of Principal Legal Advisor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qa+1k5ahzmja

just answer the questions. we need the data.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n7+1k5ahzmja

It’s staffed almost entirely by has-beens from one particular company, and they love outsourcing to India

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ew+1k5ahzmja
  1. Direct Manager great
  2. Director, who? Never met them
  3. Rehiring previous GF employees at a higher level who were dismissed from their new company is just a whole new level of HR incompetence.
  4. No I Would not recommend the company, are you kidding
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1k5ahzmja

This isn’t for the employees; HR just wants to use it for their year-end performance metrics.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e2+1k5ahzmja

Most questions don't seem to pertain to your direct manager.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1k5ahzmja

Post a reply

: