Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Loved everything about Rip the Script except WTF was Kim doing there?

It should be all about the athletes, and the amazing action sequences, then you got that fat lipped prost---te standing there doing nothing, and they had to repeat her name a bunch of times at the start. She literally made the entire thing into cheap garbage.


by
| 8 views | | 24 replies (last 3 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ktahpvaw

24 replies (most recent on top)

Rip The Script is an abysmal slogan. First, if you can’t win so win, now this. We su-k at marketing slogans

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17y+1ktahpvaw

Honestly ad was cool but hardly anyone will really see it and ads like that dont make anyone go oooh sh-t let me go buy some nikes now. gigantic money burn

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @me+1ktahpvaw

@jw 100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k3+1ktahpvaw

Kim represents none of the values that Nike stands for. Zero. If this were just a one off collaboration, that would be more understandable. But it’s an entire branded product line. A complete cash grab aimed at women while degrading sports. What an embarrassment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jw+1ktahpvaw

I hear you on what Kim K represents etc but will insist, even more because of that, the problem is not that she’s in the ad. It’s that we have Nike Skims

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jm+1ktahpvaw

@j0
Such a good point. We should pick someone who can inspire next generation girls to play sports like Serena. The ad would be almost flawless without KK. Really had no f*cking idea why she was there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j3+1ktahpvaw

I think it ultimately comes down to values and the message we send to younger women about success. Are we teaching that success comes from hard work, talent, and integrity, or from selling s-xuality online? It’s frustrating to see hardworking women often overlooked while women who build brands around s-xuality receive the biggest opportunities and visibility.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j0+1ktahpvaw

@hp I just think it’s pretty crass to associate the Nike brand with a celebrity like Kim, given her reputation. It has nothing to do with her not being a professional athlete; it has to do with what she represents.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ht+1ktahpvaw

So Kim was the problem but not all the other non pro athlete celebrities in the ad? Come on, I don’t care about her either but y’all are being too sensitive right now

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hp+1ktahpvaw

These comments are why Nike is failing. I mean dear god. Have you guys looked at RSV? It’s atrocious. Literally atrocious. It’s truly embarrassing. We should all be embarrassed about Q4. Open a tableau dashboard and check it out. All that’s doing well is… Running, Global Football, Golf, Training, and…wait for it…NikeSkims. It is a post-mortem of the decisions we make from VPs to PLMs on what we think will sell. And sh-t ain’t selling. Q4 about to be BAD people. Sportwear leading the way in declines. The ‘sport’ that’s reflective of Gen Pop consumer preferences. So maybe take a second to reflect that you might not be as smart as you think you are. Stop blaming VPs for every freaking thing. You’re holding onto an old idea. Go into the ES. Does it REALLY look that much different than 5-6 years ago? Ooo, instead of Nike Trail it now says ACG. Innovative. I mean, we have to take risks to get out of the slump. Also, guess what else barely covers you up and goes up your a-s, a jo------pDown vote this to he-l, but stop fighting math people.
(-Dude that’s not a VP)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h7+1ktahpvaw

@cz first off, NikeSkims is for women. So dude why are you in them?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h4+1ktahpvaw

Kim K is one of the worst things Nike has done. Fu-k her family's brand. Fu-k SKIMS. And fu-k anyone who thought it was a good idea.

She is the antithesis of any positive female role models. And fu-k any executive who thought she'd be great marketing opportunity. 🖕🏼

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fq+1ktahpvaw

@ew a fake body

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ff+1ktahpvaw

Kim has a body and so she is an athlete

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ew+1ktahpvaw

@cd She is completely against what Nike and sport stand for. She literally used plastic surgery to create her image. This feels like an easy way to boost women’s sales, but at the cost of the brand.

Nike’s brand is its most valuable asset. It feels like this leadership team, or maybe the previous one under JD, chose chasing after short-term sales over long-term brand value.

Terrible decision.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1ktahpvaw

@cs I honestly don't care much about Nikeskims. those clothes should be set on fire. can't even donate them to charity. who is going to wear clothes that are extremely uncomfortable, very tight, go up your b.u.tt, and only cover half your parts? I mean jeez... the bras cover only half your br.easts. your bre.asts pop off, don't sit right and really hurt in those tight bras that don't fit right. I honestly wasted my money on those things. and not to forget to mention why on earth would you associate with Kim? she is no athlete and she has a po.rn take circling around.. what on earth was Nike thinking of? I have no clue. but yet again, if you need to save a brand, po.rn would definitely do it...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1ktahpvaw

This is the best thing Nike has done in years. I nearly shed a tear.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1ktahpvaw

NikeSkims is a genius collab because Nike Women's categories have continued to underperform. Why not pair with a hyper successful women's brand?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1ktahpvaw

Wait until y’all hear about who’s behind NikeSkims!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1ktahpvaw

If someone wanted to start a petition, to have her removed I’d sign it 😅👀 There are plenty of other teams or players that could have been included for exposure or to further the reach of the ad and the Nike name, yet everyone has to look at KK some more. What garbage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1ktahpvaw

@cd This take is what’s wrong with Nike marketing and Nike in general. If you think KK is current relevant or anything but Drake 2.0 you need to retire

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1ktahpvaw

You don’t have to be a Kim fan, but acting like Nike randomly picked her misses the point. She’s one of the most influential people in culture, just launched a partnership with Nike, and gets people talking. Nike has always been about the intersection of sport and culture. The fact that everyone’s debating the ad kind of proves it worked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1ktahpvaw

Using Kim in a Nike commercial is honestly quite symbolic of how far Nike is fallen and how confused it is about its return to relevance strategy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1ktahpvaw

To be honest I rather see more Ted Lasso...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1ktahpvaw

Post a reply

: