The management and executives here are untrustworthy. They've broken just about every rule and unwritten rule possible with directs. They're the type who give you prop's the entire year and then give you a bad year end review so they can cheat you on your bonus to make some budget number. As a shareholder i've super disappointed in the place and plan to sell my stock holding in this company, and its a sizeable figure.
14 replies (most recent on top)
I mean this as respectfully as possible, but if you think executives care at all about this board, much less post, you’re kidding yourself. C-suite is too busy relocating to Florida to care about this site.
Lets be real here. Customers use bank services. These services seem simple to the customers. And in fact, are a tiny part of what goes on behind the scenes. I say this to remind everyone (if needed) that all the BS, discrimination, unfair dealings, crooked management, outsourcing, d-mb RTO rules, etc. - don't matter. They don't matter if the customer is unaffected. Its all under the rug so to speak. Until things get so bad that bank services are impacted, John Q. Public is oblivious and it all doesn't matter. Except to us. And it is continually ground into our psyche as the bus runs us over again and again. Stay at WF long enough, and one could easily be damaged goods emotionally. It really is that bad.
Thanks chainsaw, you've really done a number on WF. You have made a "difference". Now can you move on, please?
Isn't that the whole point of this board? To talk about how they keep laying off and crapping on workers?
Translation: "I'm angry, envious, and illiterate!"
Grammar policing? If English is your only or primary language, learn to use it.
@ag There's only one E in "judgment."
@be, he meant to say BoD.
OP thinks he is Bill Ackman
Aside from the misspelling, what does @OP's post have to do with this board/forum?
Revenge is best served cold. And thoughtfully. Your reactive sale of your rounding-error position is pointless, other than you think the stock is headed down so it’s in your wallet’s interest.
I don’t yet see a play by activist investors to illuminate and change the destructively horrible leadership. In turn inducing institutional holders either selling or allying with the activists.
But such things happen. As could a populist run on the bank.
It's, "props," not "prop's".
Plural, not possessive.
Having a basic command of rudimentary grammar is a prerequisite to professionalism.
If you were never sufficiently educated in your formative years (or properly self-taught thereafter), the lack of knowing how to properly communicate (especially in writing) follows you throughout the rest of your career...often resulting in garnering negative judgement and repercussions from others.
Details matter.
People notice.
Quality counts.
Ignore the sniping replies. Im sure what OP meant was sizable for themselves not the for the company. OP first three sentences are things being distracted from.
“sizeable positions” are only held by institutional plans who have no intention of selling. Your position won’t be a blip on the screen
People that complain about their reviews don't have a sizeable position in any company.