Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

Employee Satisfaction Survey

On a scale of 1–10, how much do you actively hate DXC as your employer?

1 = "I wake up weeping but I still log into MS Teams out of sheer muscle memory."

2 = "Every internal email banner triggers a violent somatic response. I have thrown up twice during global town halls."

3 = "I don’t even care about getting another job anymore. I have transitioned into pure, unadulterated spite. My only career goal is to remain on payroll long enough to watch this company default on its office leases."

4 = "I have accepted that this is purgatory. I no longer look at my bank account or the calendar. Time has lost all meaning."

5 = "I am using DXC paid compute landscape to mine crypto as a side hustle."

6 = "I actively feed wrong information to the project managers just to watch the client panic on the weekly sync."

7 = "I am deliberately missing high-severity SLAs, letting tickets rot in the queue to trigger financial penalties big enough to default the company."

8 = "I am actively injecting ransomware and destructive malware into the core delivery pipeline, ensuring our entire environment is completely unrecoverable by morning."

9 = "I am actively feeding my client counterparts the exact internal audit trails, contractual loop-holes and falsified billing logs they need to legally terminate their contracts with DXC for material breach so that I can burn DXC to the ground from the inside out."

10 = "I am actively dropping production databases and deleting backups during peak hours, purposefully disrupting client infrastructure so this entire entity finally collapses into bankruptcy."


by
| 1 view | | 8 replies (last 1 day ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kswpy466

8 replies (most recent on top)

I do hope the real survey which is arriving in an inbox near you will have all these options included. But I do expect they will just ditch all returns which put 0 in every box so that' pretty much everyone's.

I used to say I liked the WFH, but it now feels like I'm tied to the machine on the off chance of getting any work this week, and will be criticised for not being here for more than 15 minutes anytime between 6am and 8pm.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vr+1kswpy466

Number 9 is the best way... Actually doing the right thing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gx+1kswpy466

Option 2 is most accurate. Option 5 made me lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1kswpy466

My VR would be about £22k after 32 years being tupe transferred around. I was holding out for it. But realised it's not life changing money. So I'll quit and go sick when it causes DXC most pain. Smug in the thought they had to start again and will have missed yet another delivery. TBF they probably don't care.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1kswpy466

I used to try and make a difference around here. But after some years of finding that ALL my suggestions were rejected on the grounds of anything that costs money is a NO, and basically that is anything that requires staff time to discuss or implement because it costs money so it's a NO, and finally being told absolutely nobody cares so it is always going to be a NO from DXC. I stopped bothering as well.

I am now firmly in the let it fail, and we can all say I told you so and get out of here territory.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1kswpy466

All of the above. The only thing anyone is monitoring is have you logged into teams, and have you submitted your DXC.Time at least 10 days in advance. As it takes that long to get the reports out by the sounds of it.

Yes I have, but due to the ongoing fiasco of allocating working codes to staff, I'm using the underutilized/bench code as that's the only thing that works. And given I'll probably not get paid for using it I am refusing to engage in any project that cannot supply a working code.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kswpy466

I would have to be insane to actively and deliberately sabotage anything. Because if caught, I would be responsible in a court of law, as if I did something wrong. Not worth it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kswpy466

Post a reply

: