Thread regarding Open Text Corp. layoffs

NetIQ is trash

Am I the only one feeling that the NetIQ has terrible interface design and is terrible to use?


by
| 11 views | | 9 replies (last 11 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1krkmsjpd

9 replies (most recent on top)

what the he-l does this have to do with layoffs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vy+1krkmsjpd

You could vibecode a better product. So much for being “AI Excellent”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @26t+1krkmsjpd

@ns I saw the MF instance before OT stood up their own. It was just as bad. It seems to be so feature poor that you really can't make it worse, but you can't make it better either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zy+1krkmsjpd

I would rank as such:

1) google auth
2) Microsoft auth
3) a literal pile of sh-t
4) NetIQ

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yw+1krkmsjpd

Zero first hand knowledge, but, given its track record, OTX most likely decided it knew best on how a MF solution would be implemented and didn’t listen to anyone who actually did know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ns+1krkmsjpd

It's like most OpenText products have the user interface designed by an Engineer. It's like we have never hired a product designer. Most of our UIs feel like they are stuck in the 90s and why is everything so damn slow....every internal website just spins and spins before loading....JFC...is

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g9+1krkmsjpd

@c4 Facts we were so close to just using the Microsoft Authenticator for everything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ew+1krkmsjpd

We knew from Day 1 when we were asked to evaluate the sh** product .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1krkmsjpd

Turn this around. What OpenText product have a good interface design? We have never been big in UX.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1krkmsjpd

Post a reply

: