So do we think those that are now showing under 60% the last 5 months are going to be fired? Doesn't seem ethical to change it and then use it against us. I was hitting 11 days but that isn't hitting this new 60% goal.
9 replies (most recent on top)
I read the retroactive part as, you will see April's data in May.
That being said, they probably technically could confirm it by our system logins.
Hmm. I guess we shall see?
It's clear that the MC is incompetent.
There is just no way at this point I would recommend this company to even my worst enemy.
Rules changed after the AIP bonus and LTI documentation was completed.
@a4 if it is actually retroactive (in the sense that it'll be applied to our performance reviews level retroactive) literally everyone I know including myself is getting put on a PIP.
I cannot imagine the publicity nightmare this would be for them if this happened.
@a4 Yeah I did see that but someone using the new Q1 or Q4 2025 metrics as a reason for a PIP or termination would be a sh-tshow so I wonder if it's bluster.
@a2 You would think, but they actually EXPLICITELY stated in the FAQ they were making it retroactive. They are that d-mb. Mind-blowing that legal signed off on that (more likely they never reviewed it.)
Nothing would surprise me at this point. USB senior leadership has proven themselves to be dishonest, unethical, and unreliable. I don't trust or believe much of anything they say anymore.
I don't think the company is stupid enough to make the requirements retroactive, they would get buried in lawsuits. I think this is mostly pi-s-poor communication.
If that were the case, my entire team would be fired… which honestly, could happen under this regime.