Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

ITV

I have been in IT&V for 4 years. Absolute craziness.

Meaningless work. No oversight. Individual contributors at Director pay and Sr. Mgr pay all over making big money sitting around half the time doing nothing or stealing other people’s work.

We are focusing on efficiency but everything we are doing to be more efficient is making us less efficient. Layer over layer over layer of non sense on top of horrible systems and process built by inexperienced people.

No one seems to care. People stay quiet so they don’t get a target on their back.

I’m just here for the check and checked out.


by
| 1651 views | | 15 replies (last January 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kf293vp0

15 replies (most recent on top)

The strategy team is not invited to comment on this post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bm+1kf293vp0

Quoth the slopbot "You are not imagining it." LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2be+1kf293vp0

Hey all - You are not imagining it. Meet every 24–48 hours to gauge progress is not project management best practice in a knowledge-work environment like ITV.

It is:
• a control response to unrealistic plans
• a way to transfer anxiety downward
• a visibility substitute for capacity
• a hedge against missed deadlines
• a dashboard-driven micromanagement reflex

In plain terms:

We know the plan is too aggressive, so we’ll watch everyone constantly instead of fixing resourcing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ba+1kf293vp0

@y9 Incentives? IT&V isn’t finding issues. They are finding clarity concerns in control procedures.

The incentive is to move as fast as possible through a horrible designed process. No one cares about issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vh+1kf293vp0

Individual contributors at director level salary? Are they hiring?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10s+1kf293vp0

IT&V hired heavy big 4 a few years ago. Now IT&V is mostly providing feedback on control documentation and trying move as quickly through work as possible.

You get what you at for and they do understand the bank (or banking in general).

We all know how this ends.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10k+1kf293vp0

Most of ITV leadership roles were obtained amongst friends

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10h+1kf293vp0

Biggest problem with audit and ITV groups is a lack of business perspective (including willingness to understand the business) and a disregard for actual “risk” as a concept. Meaning an assessment of outstanding risk to the firm should play a more significant role in their process. Their incentives are aligned to finding issues, so it’s complicated. It does seem things are getting a bit better on this front, but the volume of audits and oversight has been insane for a while.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @y9+1kf293vp0

Audit's biggest failing is they gate-keep anyone who's not a CPA or hasn't worked at a Big 4 accounting firm. They need business expertise to function as designed, but will never get it since it's just a way for accountants to get out of accounting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @y3+1kf293vp0

It’s not “run” by anything.

It’s not really managed. QA is in I&P so they don’t know what’s actually going on. I have seen absolute trash make it through QA.

Everything is fine. Nothing to see here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xt+1kf293vp0

Pretty much everyone in audit should be fired and replaced. They havent prevented one single MRA. The nonsense makework issues coming of audit cost the company a lot of meetings and time while failing to manage or mitigate any actual risk. They dont understand the business and the issues they bring forward amount to typos.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j3+1kf293vp0

Amen

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eg+1kf293vp0

Most were placed in their role by a friend. No posting.

Go figure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1kf293vp0

interesting. what is the pay? can you share range? thanks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kf293vp0

Is it run by legacy Wells Fargo Financial dirt bags?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1kf293vp0

Post a reply

: