Thread regarding Seagate Technology Inc. layoffs

Should the over 40s go first ?

I work with a lot of good guys but we are getting old / should we get let go first and safe the young guys jobs ? Big shout out to Silver Fox , Rusty Weasel & Honey Badger ….

by
| 3365 views | | 19 replies (last May 18, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1mFibFBV

19 replies (most recent on top)

If they had a transparent voluntary process, I’m certain many over 50 with 20 plus years would signup. Most get it’s a business decision and nothing personal. Frankly, I’d volunteer and train my replacements on the way out. Enjoyed the engineering. Dislike the poor senior management that has placed the company in such a crippled state. If customers ain’t buying drives now. How is making a larger HAMR drive going to make them change their mind? Hmm. Something to think about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ukr+1mFibFBV

Frosty should setup a military obstacle course at each site. Everyone on list should have one attempt at finishing course. Top finishers get taken off list and reassigned as servers on Air Frost One.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1unh+1mFibFBV

Hand me the severance and put me out of my misery. If only they passed around a sign-up sheet a couple of months back. Nothing is worth staying here anymore. No bonus, no inflation adjusted raise, no thanks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hbf+1mFibFBV

IMO the 50+ were over-represented in the Nov and Mar cuts at NRM. I'm sure HR already got talking points from the same people who used the "final assembly is not in the US" excuse. Maybe along the lines of we-assumed-they-wanted-to-retire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dlh+1mFibFBV

@erj+1mFibFBV sorry never stop......

trying to cover the lazy arses who lick round the leads stand chatting...but surprisingly when managers are about all work....makes me laugh.....

........enough full stops there

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uku+1mFibFBV

@pju+1mFibFBV lies lies lies.people sat on there a-s or stood chatting when other people workin...u must be one of the ones sitting..u want to work there's work to do...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qjm+1mFibFBV

@jvo+1mFibFBV....You can't put a shift in if there isn't the work to do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pju+1mFibFBV

@Flying Ostrich .You might want to learn how to use full stops.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @erj+1mFibFBV

The layoff a few months ago was by $, not headcount - so it was basically a manager's decision between a few of the highest paid (ie, oldest) - or more heads of the younger and lower paid workers. Coincidentally, we gave up our 2 oldest and highest paid guys. This was new and it all seemed to signal the end of the early retirement packages to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @npw+1mFibFBV

“Age discrimination” ?

You haven’t been paying attention if you think that Seagate hasn’t been practicing age discrimination. The place is like Logan’s Run.

Every layoff the over 50s and the over 55s are over represented. There’s practically no way for them to continue to avoid the Deep Sleep. Especially with these constant rounds of layoffs.

Run Logan . . . Run.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jcz+1mFibFBV

@jvo+1mFibFBV not deadwood neither applies to me but I want out...the company is done less then 2 years I say...how long are they gonna send wafers from the USA so sprintown to send em back hardly ecanomically viable...new fab in normandale soon be filled with our tools.....pretty sure they can do what we do for less of a cost.....no union in America remember

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kqh+1mFibFBV

Get rid of (1) those with a poor sick record and (2) those who are on a warning. Getting rid of the deadwood might make others actually put a shift in

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvo+1mFibFBV

Team oldie wants to go--dy.

.....let the ypung ones wreck the company......

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vcl+1mFibFBV

Team Oldie for the win!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @slx+1mFibFBV

@vmu+1mFibFBV that's good then I'm safe...goodnight and god bless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fkn+1mFibFBV

In the USA, that would be age discrimination. Those over 40 are a protected class.

Far easier to cut programs and facilities.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vmu+1mFibFBV

@uup+1mFibFBV not saying that but a days work would ki-l em...less than 2 years no redundancy needs to be paid..save money there and on wages...or let 5 people go at 4 years and save 5 wages there or let 1 person at 20 years go and save 1 wage...u do the math what makes more sense cheers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qfi+1mFibFBV

This thread cracks me up. As if the OP has any say, in who gets let go! Regardless the list is already finalized. Also you think the young guys are sittin around saying "we're still young, we should get let go first so the old folks can make it to retirement" LOLOLOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uup+1mFibFBV

I say get rid of those less than 5 years..keep the experienced ones.Young ones don't want to work nowadays just want to chat...I dont get paid to talk......

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gdf+1mFibFBV

Post a reply

: