Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

GM lays off more than 1,700 at sites in Michigan, Ohio, citing EV challenges

  • General Motors laid off more than 1,700 workers across manufacturing sites in Michigan and Ohio, the company confirmed to CNBC.
  • The layoffs include jobs at Detroit’s electric vehicle plant and Ohio’s Ultium Cells battery cell plant, in addition to temporary layoffs at Ultium Cells’ Tennessee plant.
  • The company cited a slowdown in the electric vehicle market.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/29/gm-layoffs-michigan-ohio.html


by
| 1562 views | | 18 replies (last November 6) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k8rsmmf8

18 replies (most recent on top)

@15w
short term profits
long term extinction

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ag+1k8rsmmf8

@14w MB left profit on the table by not canning Reuss. An X'er with boomer sensibility trying to out-trend, his products are missing a generational gift to GM. Following age groups further from family GM fondness, are having reality sink in, or are growing up to be tighter with their dollars.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @184+1k8rsmmf8

It was the same with Jack Welch at GE.

He destroyed that company, but business leaders thought he was a genius.

He popularized stack ranking and annual layoffs to "improve employee quality"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @162+1k8rsmmf8

@14w
The company made record profits from her ruthlessness.
I believe she will be celebrated in business schools for decades.
I'm not kidding either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15w+1k8rsmmf8

Clearly other then hanging on big profit suvs trucks and v8s this company has no vision. Always short term greed.

At least MB made yet another fortune inflating shares and then selling

You led the way Mary

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14w+1k8rsmmf8

@r2
Tesla has modules that are integrated.
Ours are big and separate.
You should see the mess that comprises the sdv modules and wiring.
So yes, much of this (the mess) is a GM issue but the level of sophistication of a Tesla is still more intense than most ICE vehicles.
I still don't know why we just don't copy the Tesla like BYD does.
Instead we have dinosaurs from powertrain (yes they are over the EV powertrains) with their silos and boomer thinking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rs+1k8rsmmf8

My Tesla has a front trunk. Somehow they were able to use less space for a drive train.

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/models/en_us/GUID-356E0168-47E5-400F-AD83-4F1B86C7D991.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r2+1k8rsmmf8

So maybe that's a GM problem instead of an industry problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qw+1k8rsmmf8

@q8
The motor itself has fewer moving parts but literally everything around it takes up much more space, has more modules, HVAC, and weight and has wiring everywhere.
There's a huge reason the entire drive unit compartment is covered by a giant piece of plastic. They don't want you looking at the mess!
You can argue all you want but engineers and designers work with this stuff day in and day out and know better. Get an education before you open your mouth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q9+1k8rsmmf8

https://www.alphamotorinc.com/about/ev-vs-ice-fewer-moving-parts-less-maintenance#:~:text=Electric%20vehicles%20(EVs)%20have%20fewer%20moving%20parts,Injectors%20*%20Filters%20*%20Gears%20*%20Clutches

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q8+1k8rsmmf8

@jp
Wrong. Do you work on EVs at GM? I have been for many years. They are many times more complicated than ICE vehicles.
The electrical system is extremely complex with many modules, wiring harnesses, etc. that ICE cars do not have.
Please stop with this nonsense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ky+1k8rsmmf8

An EV is simpler to build than ICE and has fewer parts, so it should be cheaper. Except the battery pack is really expensive. I don't know why a battery costs so much. But that's why we can't get the cost down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jp+1k8rsmmf8

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-evs-now-cheaper-gas-083400354.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j9+1k8rsmmf8

@hj
I was against buying GM stock and now I'm wishing I did.
I suspect they are doing well...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hk+1k8rsmmf8

Are the shareholder’s ok ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hj+1k8rsmmf8

Years ago, leadership showed all the doubting employees charts of the exponential EV sales growth just around the corner and that we just needed to believe in this unbelievable mission and press on when it was obvious nobody wanted to buy these electronic clap traps. Condescending pep talks of Zero Zero Zero that a nine year old would roll their eyes at.

Did they show those same sales forecast charts to investors and shareholders back then? What do they have to say about it now? “Sorry we got some things wrong, but gotta go cash our bonus checks - we’ll circle back and catch up about this later…”

Pray for all the people losing their jobs so that a handful of narcissistic a--holes could try to prove to the world they knew anything about their customers or the products they actually wanted to buy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fw+1k8rsmmf8

They never got the costs down for EVs like Chinese companies did, so when they lost subsidies they lost sales. GM's EVs had a 14k price premium over equivalent ICE vehicles.

Management's business plans depended on the government covering for their failures.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1k8rsmmf8

Somehow they missed citing stupidity in the management team... "Slowdown?" how do you slow down something that never got going?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1k8rsmmf8

Post a reply

: