Thread regarding Walgreens layoffs

Walgreens Will Fall

This company is going to collapse, and you need to prepare yourself for that. I left many years ago because I saw the writing on the wall. The recent sale to private equity will not save the company; it's the final death knell. Let me tell you a little story:

I worked for Walgreens in the Pharmacy from 2005 until 2013. I enjoyed the work so much that I started to pursue a PharmD. The work was always grueling, and we were always strapped for time, even in the beginning. I remember working double shifts during hurricanes and eating on the back counter often because we didn't have time to take breaks. I've heard the pharmacy actually shuts down now for lunch...must be nice.

At any rate, from the time I started until the time I left, our budget was continuously reduced. We were asked to do more with less, and it wasn't just us who suffered, it was the customer experience as well. These are operational changes meant to increase margins or protect existing margins, but they are not strategic choices. The reason they were necessary at all is due to strategic missteps, but what were they?

Here it is, from this single strategic error, all subsequent failures originate: Walgreens as a company failed to see the entire market shifting beneath its feet. Their strategy was based on the following model: expand stores, expand sales per store, reduce costs, and reward shareholders. The company was, and still is, optimized for operational efficiency. This model was fundamentally obsolete the moment that CVS and Caremark merged to create a fully integrated pharmacy services provider.

They failed to realize that the number of stores or operational excellence is meaningless in an environment where the PBMs are now the locus of control. The PBMs control the formularies, and hence, demand. They set reimbursement rates, and hence, margin. The number of stores isn't an advantage in this environment. If anything, it's a vulnerability.

The most egregious part of all this, is that it was entirely predictable. It didn't happen overnight. Instead of shifting their strategy and trying to acquire their own PBM, WAG sold theirs off. Then in 2011, they tried to play chicken with Express Scripts, and again they were critically mistaken. The number of stores is not equivalent to bargaining power. They lost that fight, and were forced into a worse agreement because of it. From then on, they lost negotiating power permanently, and all other negotiations would be from a weakened position.

Were that not enough, they bought Boots in 2014, which again doesn't solve the issue of vertical integration. They were still operating under the assumption that expanding the footprint would lead to better profits.

In an act of desperation, they invested in Theranos, and I think we all know how that went.

So where did that lead them?

To the following negative feedback loop:

lower reimbursement -> lower margin

lower margin -> labor and store cuts

labor and store cuts -> worse customer experience

worse customer experience -> lower foot traffic

lower foot traffic -> lower sales and even weaker negotiating position

This loop will not stop, and it will not be broken by Private Equity. Those are the only tools private equity really has. They can make operational changes. They cannot solve the strategic failure. They cannot suddenly negotiate better deals with the PBMs without leverage. They cannot reverse the regulatory framework that allowed this level of vertical integration to happen. They cannot afford to vertically integrate themselves, and there are no PBMs that would be a viable target even if they could.

So, where does all that leave us? There is only one inevitable conclusion: bankruptcy.

I saw this coming and left. I ask you, do you trust the leadership that allowed the company to reach this state from a position of strength, to be able to turn it around from a position of weakness? They made countless strategic errors. Do you trust your career with them?


by
| 2563 views | | 10 replies (last January 8) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kdfh9vrc

10 replies (most recent on top)

They outlasted Rite Aid - small win.

CVS and Walgreens are both struggling now.

Walgreens could create a very focused pharmacy model. Many people are irritated with CVS and Walgreens seems to have a loyal pharmacy clientele.

I don't see how they can keep the big retail store footprints, though. Photo is no longer bringing in people. FedEx is not much of a sideline. Illegal debit cards are not a great business model.

I see a lot of older Walgreens people who seem resolved to stay until retirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yv+1kdfh9vrc

PBM’s are not the answer to everything. Only a matter of time before PBM reform becomes a reality, and when that happens even CVS will suffer badly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mv+1kdfh9vrc

@j7 Greg Wasson

The CEO of Walgreens (Greg Wasson) made a deal with the CEO of Cooler Screens (Greg Wasson).

So, Greg Wasson made a deal with himself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jf+1kdfh9vrc

Do you know who the CEO of Express Scripts was when they sc--wed Walgreens? The same guy became the CEO of Walgreens and presided over its demise as a public company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j7+1kdfh9vrc

So you left Walgreens but still come on this site to write multiple paragraphs. Do you have friends?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gz+1kdfh9vrc

Walgreens owns approximately 10% to 15% of its stores and leases the remaining majority.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g3+1kdfh9vrc

I think private equity is thinking about how to monetize what's left. Does Walgreens own the properties? They are probably worth more than the operations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1kdfh9vrc

Sadly, spot on and very well written. Not that it matters, but who was the CEO when they sold off the PBM, played chicken with Express Scripts and made the Theranos and Boots deal? Surely it wasn’t the same individual…?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1kdfh9vrc

@OP Thank you for your very well thought out and quite likely scenario. I wonder how long it will take for events to unfold. Under Sycamore, the financials are pretty opaque so there's no telling how bad things really are. The elimination of paid holidays seemed desperate. From what little I understand about private equity, the enormous debt will be assigned to Walgreens while Sycamore could sell the company off in parts and make a tidy profit. Not sure what Pessina's end game is. It seems he's throwing good money after bad but maybe it's an effort to mitigate losses. What's always troubling is how these CEO's (and various other higher-ups) through their lack of originality and leadership, put the company on a collision course with disaster and still walk away with a boatload of money, leaving the rank-and-file in their wake.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bh+1kdfh9vrc

@OP Thank you. Your observations are spot on. The core issue is reimbursement rates. Sycamore is focused on increasing foot traffic. They have a retail store mentality. Which won’t solve the core issue. Selling more pretzels, shampoo, or vape products will not save us. They correctly did not fire the CFO, but he resigned. As did other key experienced people in pharmacy finance. The new CFO is a retail guy. We are lost.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1kdfh9vrc

Post a reply

: