Thread regarding F5 Networks Inc. layoffs

Does F5 deserve a second chance? I say No

until such time that the primary corporate emphasis of financial revenue quantity has changed to product quality.


by
| 1066 views | | 10 replies (last December 5) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kagy0mvj

10 replies (most recent on top)

@2es the survey was rigged with positive CEO - 75% is way to high.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2f1+1kagy0mvj

Culture Shift

Employee reviews suggest F5’s “Human First” culture feels diluted, with decisions perceived as top-heavy and optics-driven.
Management rated 3.0/5 on Blind; CEO rating 75/100 (A-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2es+1kagy0mvj

@11g nothing confusing about it at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11r+1kagy0mvj

@OP This post is confusing. F5 is a corporation. Only clients and users vote with their wallets, giving or not giving a chance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11g+1kagy0mvj

@hn Correct. As much as these id--ts want it to fail, it won’t. And they will still be here 5 years from now, like they were 5 years ago, saying any day now it will fail. LMAO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ze+1kagy0mvj

@OP If F5 is ever to regain any credibility, they need to commit to a 5 year - 4 step quality initiative. The first part/phase is to commit and achieve the milestone in which all submitted known bugs/errors/failures have been fixed before a software release - regardless of severity. After this milestone is achieved, the remaining steps will become self evident.

I also know that this won't happen because there will be hundreds of reasons/justifications on why this can't be done. I can only think of one. It's the right thing to do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ss+1kagy0mvj

@OP that’s for clients to decide

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hn+1kagy0mvj

@gy bankrupt -- YES!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gz+1kagy0mvj

It deserves to be bankrupt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gy+1kagy0mvj

No no no no no

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gq+1kagy0mvj

Post a reply

: