Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

Transformation Scorecard Progress

BNY Mellon employees are voicing deep concerns about layoffs, offshoring, and leadership transparency. Sentiment ranges from frustration and distrust to resignation and strategic exit planning.

Below are current results of the Top 15 employee concerns, associated employee sentiments and reactions to leadership responses. These are actual results (with a hint of humor) based on current internet discussions and reports from multiple sources.

Top 15 Concerns & Sentiment Breakdown:

  1. Offshoring to Pune, India
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Betrayal, anxiety, and the creeping suspicion that their job just got a one-way ticket to another time zone. Frustration, betrayal, fear of redundancy.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Global talent optimization.” Translation: cheaper labor, dismissive of U.S. talent, fewer complaints, and better PowerPoint formatting. Cost-driven, efficiency-focused; perceived as dismissive of U.S. talent.

  2. Forced Ranking & Performance-Based Exits
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Hunger Games meets HR. Everyone’s a “low performer” eventually. Anxiety, distrust in fairness.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Driving a high-performance culture.” Also, a great way to trim headcount without calling it a layoff. Justified as "performance culture"; seen as opaque and arbitrary.

  3. Closure of Wilmington & Other U.S. Sites
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Shock, grief, and a sudden interest in Zillow listings in Delaware. Anger, helplessness, lack of relocation support.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Strategic footprint realignment.” Bonus points for announcing it via Teams chat at 4:59 PM on a Friday. Framed as strategic consolidation; perceived as abrupt and lacking empathy.

  4. AI-Driven Role Elimination
    📉 Employee Sentiment: “I trained the bot that replaced me.” Skepticism, fear of being replaced.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Innovation at scale.” Also, the AI doesn’t ask for raises or take mental health days. Promoted as innovation; seen as lacking in human impact planning.

  5. Unequal Salary Increases
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Analysts got a 20% bump. VPs got a “thank you” and a free meditation app. Frustration, betrayal, perceived favoritism.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Market-aligned compensation strategy.” Also, “We’ll circle back on that.” Leadership disconnected from frontline realities.

  6. Lack of Transparency in Layoff Criteria
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Rumors, paranoia, and Teams channels named 'Who’s-Next. Distrust, rumors, emotional exhaustion.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “We can’t comment on individual cases.” Also, “Please refer to the FAQ we updated 3 minutes ago.” Avoids specifics; messaging seen as evasive and legally sanitized.

  7. Decline of Pittsburgh as a Growth Hub
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Nostalgia, resentment, and a sudden uptick in LinkedIn activity. Disappointment, strategic exit planning.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Decentralized innovation.” Also, “We’re excited about our 3 strategic growth centers and lower cost, consolidated real estate holdings.” Quietly deprioritized; perceived as abandoning legacy locations.

  8. Severance Inconsistencies & Unemployment Eligibility
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Confused, lawyer-curious, and Googling “constructive dismissal.” Confusion, fear of financial instability.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “We’re following all applicable laws.” Also, “We appreciate your service.” Legally cautious; seen as ethically indifferent and inconsistent.

  9. Culture of Waiting for Retirement or the Next Cut
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Zombie mode. Badge in, badge out. Resignation, disengagement.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Voluntary attrition is a natural part of transformation.” Also, “We’re building a future-ready workforce.” Not directly addressed; perceived as passive acceptance of attrition.

  10. Global Workforce Imbalance & Morale
    📉 Employee Sentiment: U.S. teams feel ghosted. Offshore teams feel ghostwritten. Fractured teams, resentment across regions.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “One global team.” Except some teams are more 'global' than others. Framed as global optimization; seen as favoring offshore growth over U.S. retention.

  11. Leadership Communication Style
    📉 Employee Sentiment: Corporate Mad Libs with a side of gaslighting. Cynicism, fatigue.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Transparent and empathetic.” Also, “We’re listening.” (But only to shareholder sentiment, not you.) Polished but vague; perceived as disconnected and overly scripted.

  12. Strategic Ambiguity in Transformation Plans
    📉 Employee Sentiment: “What are we transforming into, exactly?” Confusion, lack of trust.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “Agile, resilient, and future-focused.” Also, “That's a broken sprint and we may pick that up in our 2026 PI-3 planning.” Buzz-word heavy; seen as lacking clear direction or accountability.

  13. Declining Internal Mobility
    📉 Employee Sentiment: “Apply internally” = “Apply to be ignored.” Hopelessness, stagnation.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “We encourage career growth.” Just not here. Or now. Or for you. Not prioritized; perceived as undermining career development.

  14. Performative Wellness Initiatives
    📉 Employee Sentiment: “I lost my job, but at least I got a free access to Spring Health's mindfulness self-help app.” Eye-rolling, sarcasm.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “We care deeply about your well-being.” Especially when it doesn’t cost anything. Promoted heavily; viewed as superficial and misaligned with actual stressors.

  15. Erosion of Institutional Loyalty
    📉 Employee Sentiment: “I used to bleed for BNY Mellon. Now I just bleed.” Exit planning, emotional detachment.
    🎩 Leadership Perception: “We’re evolving our culture.” Into what, no one knows. Possibly a chatbot. Not acknowledged; perceived as collateral damage of transformation strategy.

Summary Themes:

• Strategic Distrust: Employees feel decisions are driven by cost-cutting, not stewardship.
• Emotional Fatigue: Layoff cycles and vague transformation language have worn down morale.
• Leadership Disconnect: Senior leaders are viewed as detached, evasive, and overly polished.
• Exit Momentum: Younger and mid-career professionals are actively seeking roles elsewhere.

In summary, BNY Mellon's transformation strategy is widely perceived by employees as a cost-cutting campaign disguised in corporate jargon, marked by offshoring, opaque layoffs, and performative wellness. Leadership is seen as detached and scripted, while morale erodes under forced rankings, AI-driven exits, and strategic ambiguity.

What do you think? Please share in the comments.


by
| 21262 views | | 12 replies (last January 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k81xs0j9

12 replies (most recent on top)

Dear EC & HR Trolls:

Where are we in moving the needle on these Top 15 Employee concerns with our ongoing transformation? How about a publishing a status report that addresses these concerns?

Listening to an RV interview this week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, RV stated that the current transformation progress has been 'FUN' and that 'OUR CULTURE IS ENERGIZED AND YOU CAN FEEL THE EXCITEMENT IN EVERY HALLWAY!'

I don't know about you, but after putting the stock price aside, these statements to CNBC absolutely ignore the truth about how associates describe their concerns for the present and the future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dg0+1k81xs0j9

Wonder whether the EC is concerned with moving the needle on these Top 15 concerns? Whatever happened to Peakon surveys and net promoter scores (NPS) for these items?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4n4+1k81xs0j9

It’s all about the money; costs to BNY Mellon and what work can be sent offshore. Forget about loyalty, leadership, dedication, work ethic, core value awards, etc. Did ten years in Oriskany with terrible management then left when the first cracks in the walls started to appear. BNY Mellon doesn’t care about their employees only the bottom line. Any corporate changes that positively affect employees is a pipe dream.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nh+1k81xs0j9

@ef it’s all a pay for play scheme between BNY and the state and local politicians to keep jobs in the region and for BNY to negotiate tax credits or other consideration to remain in Pittsburgh. The CMU deal helps promote BNY’s position as an AI leader, but it seems a bit of a stretch to call Pittsburgh a AI growth location. Pittsburgh’s labor market is also cheap relative to NYC and Boston where other prestigious tech schools are located, so this is clearly Win-Win. The execs in Pittsburgh are holdovers from Mellon Bank, and not likely transplants from BNY NYC or other locations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1k81xs0j9

Pittsburgh is the only growth location for AI. Hiring through CMU is the only good thing this company has done regardless of your view on AI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ef+1k81xs0j9

@e1
When was the last time Robin and his directs ever called Pittsburgh a ‘growth center’?
Answer: never.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ea+1k81xs0j9

@e1 PA politicians are desperately trying to protect jobs from leaving the area. BNY Pittsburgh plans require less floor space and headcount due primarily to offshoring plans. Pittsburgh is not a strategic location.

After wiping Mellon Bank from the BNY branding, BNY is looking to capitalize on CMU hires for AI leadership talent while retaining parts of the business that are difficult to offshore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1k81xs0j9

Pittsburgh is a growth center, where are you getting your info? New huge partnership with CMU, plus startups in Pittsburgh. Multiple execs are based there, too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1k81xs0j9

Strategic Risk Exposure: Associate Concerns and Leadership Accountability

There are legal and ethical imperatives for addressing associate concerns. While not all grievances carry direct legal liability, the cumulative impact poses significant risks to shareholder value, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation. The following outlines a sampling of leadership’s governance expectations, and strategic imperatives for proactive engagement.

📜 Governance & Ethical Expectations
• Board Oversight: Human capital risk is a governance priority. Ignoring associate distress undermines fiduciary duty.
• CEO Accountability: Culture flows from the top. Failure to address systemic concerns reflects poor stewardship.
• Code of Conduct: Associates are encouraged to speak up. Leadership must respond with integrity and transparency.

📉 Strategic Risks
• Talent Drain: High performers exit quietly, leaving behind disengagement and reputational damage. Addressing concerns preserves institutional knowledge and morale.
• Brand Erosion: Negative reviews, social media exposure, and employee activism threaten investor confidence. Silence or deflection invites scrutiny and public backlash.
• Regulatory Scrutiny: ESG and DEI commitments require demonstrable action—not performative messaging. Ethical leadership demands proactive engagement, not reactive containment.
• Operational Fragility: Morale, productivity, and innovation suffer when trust erodes.

🗣️ Recommendations

  1. Acknowledge Associate Concerns: Silence is complicity. Leadership must validate and address feedback.
  2. Conduct Cultural Audit: Engage third-party experts to assess systemic risks and recommend reforms.
  3. Enhance Transparency: Communicate rationale behind layoffs, restructuring, office closure plans and mobility decisions.
  4. Empower Mobility: Create clear pathways for internal advancement across functions and geographies.
  5. Reinforce Ethical Leadership: Align executive behavior with stated values and governance principles.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1k81xs0j9

Thanks, A.I. bot... You summed things up perfectly!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1k81xs0j9

Will you share this with execs and senior management? You should.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1k81xs0j9

Wilmington is not losing. Where are you getting that idea?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k81xs0j9

Post a reply

: