Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Wave 2 Postings

San Ramon, less or more jobs than you expected?


by
| 3883 views | | 18 replies (last August 27) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k3jhsr00

18 replies (most recent on top)

@e8 Exactly. Genius!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hg+1k3jhsr00

the work can be done anywhere (MSSC, BA, Engine), just not in San Ramon after 2026

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e8+1k3jhsr00

@dj Again, folks, if you are currently based in SR, and you want to post for a job that is based in Houston, and the jobs tool says “no relocation,” you CAN actually post for that job because folks in SR are part of the forced headquarters move.

Also, to echo what someone else posted, the company does NOT allow you to self-move. You have to go through the relocation process.

I hope this helps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1k3jhsr00

@dj This policy is noted on the first page of the US Relocation Program Website. Not sure if exceptions will be made as part of the ongoing reorg.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1k3jhsr00

@d5 Was it a normal PDC cycle that they won't allow you to self-relocate? Currently, a massive layoff cycle is underway, and it might be allowed. If the company won't let SR people relocate to Houston even on their own, they might as well tell them they're done and not to worry about this charade.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1k3jhsr00

@cj Chevron will not allow you to self relocate. Been there, done that!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d5+1k3jhsr00

Just following up on the relocation details: once you're officially notified of a position in Houston, you have 12 months to complete the move. I was explicitly told that no exceptions would be granted for any personnel. Of course, we all know exceptions sometimes happen, but in my case, both the documentation and my manager were very clear. I’m aware that a few folks in Finance are pushing to remain in San Ramon, but it’s hard to see how an exemption could be justified for them when the rest of us are expected to comply.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1k3jhsr00

@b6 It depends on how important it is to keep your job, even if it's not eligible for relocation assistance. You can pay for the move yourself if you get the job in Houston. The company's salary and benefits are quite good. Don't let the cost of moving influence your decision. If you're competitive, go for it. The income tax savings in Texas probably cover the relocation costs. Good luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1k3jhsr00

@c4+1k3jhsr00
I agree with you, I know a guy that is a 25+ and lives in California. When you look at his desk location in the directory, his desk is located in HOU140 but he lives in California. :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1k3jhsr00

I've heard they are making many exceptions for 25+ level people they want to keep even allowing until 2027. So I don't think this mid 2026 is correct.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1k3jhsr00

The fact that no one wants to go on record about relocation timing tells me this person is probably right

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1k3jhsr00

@bj mind sharing if this is for certain team or BU or entire San Ramon building?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @by+1k3jhsr00

The revised timeline presents notable implications for San Ramon. According to one of the decks shared with our team, the guidance indicates that relocations should occur "ASAP," with the majority of transitions finalized by the end of this year. However, there are specific exceptions extending into 2026.

For employees with school-aged children and confirmed roles within the new organization, relocation is expected to take place during the summer of 2026. After July 1, 2026, the only personnel remaining in San Ramon will be those scheduled to exit the company by year-end. These individuals will be responsible for managing transition-related activities.

We’ve been informed that there will be no exceptions for employees continuing with the company to remain in San Ramon beyond July 2026. Most VPs overseeing personnel have access to a standardized Q&A document. If you have questions, please reach out directly to your group’s VP for clarification.

While we understand this may be a significant change, remaining in San Ramon is not a viable option moving forward.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1k3jhsr00

They still haven't indicated when relo would be, probably by end of 2026?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1k3jhsr00

@b6 TALK YO YOUR SELECTION REP!! I just found out that we CAN post for those no relo jobs if we are located in SR currently because we fall under the HQ related forced move. Unfortunately this nuance has not been well advertised (draw your own conclusions).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1k3jhsr00

No jobs in San Ramon. Lots of the jobs in Houston that I would be competitive forare not relocation eligible so that means they want to fill them with Houston people. It feels very unfair because there are a lot of very qualified folks such as myself that would go to Houston if it were relo eligible. I just don’t understand how that’s keeping the best people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1k3jhsr00

@OP Does the word nonexistent mean anything to ya?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1k3jhsr00

less is more

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1k3jhsr00

Post a reply

: