That's one of this years IT KPIs.
12 replies (most recent on top)
@n9 which is????
It’s been a week.
And the big news is?
BIG news coming to IT in the next week…
ITLT told us they would offshore over 3 years. This is in their plans. The 60% is just the beginning. They are offshoring at all levels so why couldn’t they offshore 95% of IT. They will definitely offshore when we are at $50 bbl. They will not change their plans- look at how they treat offshore vs onshore employees. They have hybrid 2 days while you have 4. Who do you think they are trying to retain?
@c9
I would say 50 and below should start looking for a new job outside chevron unless you are 50 and 25 years with chevron. Scale back your spending and prepare for a rocky road ahead.
@cb so Chevron HQ will be in India? I’m sure decisions will need to be made here in the US, as these boomers retire, there will be seats to fill. I just plan on playing the game, let the company fail miserably, tell leaders what they want to hear “yes we can hire more Indians” and let it fall apart. It’s not my company, I dont care.
@c9 If you’re not ready to retire, you won’t have a career future here. Company is pushing to offshore everything. The question is Why not offshore? Cost is the sole driver for decisions. Look at all the metrics. Onshore is too expensive in comparison. If you want a career you need to leave. Others are just waiting for retirement
@ay what is a young career employee? 40 and below?
Wasn’t this pretty much stated at the town hall early last year, where they showed numbers decreasing in high cost locations and increasing in Manila, BA and India? Hardly a surprise. They showed target percentages then.
On my floor it seems like we have already met the objective.
What’s the 3 years plan? 98%?
@OP Yes. This is what I understand also. This is why I don’t understand young career employees sticking around or even relocating to Houston. They will end up without a job. This is a deadend.