Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Choosing Pain on Purpose

Think about this.

Most companies, when they see something causing unnecessary stress or friction for employees, try to fix it. Even small things. Shorter commutes, more flexibility, better alignment. It’s basic common sense because it improves morale and productivity.

Here it feels like the exact opposite.

Every decision somehow lands on the option that creates the most friction. The most inconvenience. The most disruption to people’s lives.

Live 10 miles from one office? Doesn’t matter. You’re required to drive 50 miles to another one.
Can do your job perfectly from home? Irrelevant. Be physically present anyway.
Teams are distributed across the country? Still sit in an office on Teams calls.

At some point it stops feeling accidental. It starts to feel like pain is being chosen on purpose.

And then leadership turns around and asks why there’s no culture. Why people aren’t going above the bare minimum anymore. Why morale is gone.

Morale didn’t just disappear. It was worn down decision by decision, policy by policy, until people stopped believing anything would actually improve.

Then you hear “there’s no loyalty anymore” while at the same time wondering why no one shows up to town halls, no one engages, no one cares.

It’s not confusing.

People don’t disengage for no reason. They disengage when they feel ignored, when feedback goes nowhere, and when every decision makes their day-to-day worse.

And yet somehow the expectation is that people should accept all of this, have bad policy shoved down their throats, and then turn around and be grateful for it. After surveys where honest feedback was ignored or worse, scolded.

That’s not just disconnected. It’s delusional.

This didn’t become a bottom-tier culture overnight. It got there because of decisions like this. Because of policies like this.

Culture and morale aren’t things you can slap on a PowerPoint and speak into existence. They’re built by listening, adjusting, and actually giving people a reason to care.

Right now, that reason is gone.


by
| 54 views | | 17 replies (last April 7) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knh66mdf

17 replies (most recent on top)

“Im looking for a job, and i wont even give a week notice, 3 days if im in the mood that day”

No one will even know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gb+1knh66mdf

I hate this company with every fiber of my being and as soon as im done milking the checks, i will never ever recommend this to anyone, be it friends, neighbors or strangers. The lack of assigned seating is a slap in the face. Going to the office 5 days a week with no assigned seats, walking in the hallway like you're some kind of garbage takes a toll on me. Im looking for a job, and i wont even give a week notice, 3 days if im in the mood that day

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g2+1knh66mdf

I hate having to actually work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1knh66mdf

@c3 if it made sense I wouldn’t care, but it doesn’t, so I do. Who are you to judge anyone anyway, cuckster? How are those baldz in your mouth?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1knh66mdf

Working in an office is pain? You have had an easy life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1knh66mdf

@b9

Thank God the broken record is back again to regurgitate the same one-liner. Never learning from any replies. Never refining their approach. Just the same basic concept over and over and over and over and over...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1knh66mdf

The difference is they want you to quit here. Once you finally get that, it all becomes pretty clear.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bh+1knh66mdf

The misery is the point. Has been for years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1knh66mdf

@aw

Very simplistic worldview and I reject it. I'll stay with option #3 - remain employed as long as possible, while minimizing work effort/output and maximizing resource waste.

Learn to live with it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1knh66mdf

@av

No. But please keep on whining. One of these days, it's bound to pay off for you, right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1knh66mdf

@av boo hoo… get over it or quit coming to this site

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1knh66mdf

This is an employer’s market. Employers have the upper hand and will continue to for the foreseeable future. If no longer wanting to be employed, seek other options.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1knh66mdf

When the employment situation turns around? Hopefully it does but right now I am seeing continuing layoffs, hearing about recent college graduates having a hard time finding work. Obviously these folks aren’t qualified to be AI engineers. On a more modest level, seeing space for lease signs slowly popping up around this area. Things are getting interesting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1knh66mdf

None of it is accidental. It is all designed to create a younger, more docile workforce. They have state dit outright on numerous occasions. Stankey does not do positive reinforcement for behavior change. Spare the rod, spoil the employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1knh66mdf

OP -- When you consider Stank's end game then it all makes sense. He wants head count below 100K employees, and maybe closer to 75K employees. So, he does not give a sh!t about employee satisfaction until it starts to hurt him financially. When the employment situation turns around, he will be hurting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1knh66mdf

@a8

And none of those folks had any sort of "leadership" chain to enforce accountability and productivity? Just unassigned employees cutting their own deals every day?

Sounds like pigshit to me, bootlicker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1knh66mdf

“The most disruption to people’s lives.”

Moving up to 40 hours of bare minimum presence has been a disruption's for the majority. This is why RTO has been mandated across the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1knh66mdf

Post a reply

: