Thread regarding Bank of America layoffs

The biggest evidence for bad managers is the inconsistency for applying the working in office requirements. It's a joke.


by
| 1763 views | | 11 replies (last September 5) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k3v83dzj

11 replies (most recent on top)

There is a process and managers do have to follow it. If someone isn’t coming in, they may have an approved accommodation (which manager has basically no say over) or a temp arrangement do to a family issue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16y+1k3v83dzj

if you are overall in compliance, it's up to the manager. personally, I had a family emergency in June that is still not over and I have not been in compliance all summer but HR was informed by my manager.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zt+1k3v83dzj

@q5
if you are overall incompliance is HR going to call you out or is it a middle manager thing where no matter what you need to be in office 3 days period ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @y4+1k3v83dzj

@ah yes we are. It's dangerous, time consuming, ki-ls productivity and very costly, especially parking. Given the excuse to "encourage collaboration" when all you do is sit on teams calls all day. It's 100% for attrition. They should convert some of the office space to residential and let the productive employees work from home.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v8+1k3v83dzj

@b0+1k3v83dzj

Love that idea! The RTO enforcement officers should get a special badge and ride around the office on mall security cop scooters and talk to employees that are out of compliance. Print out a document on a portable printer outlining the violation and next steps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v5+1k3v83dzj

BTW...what happened to all those people on here who were all but guaranteeing that full-time, 5 days a week RTO was coming this year?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qy+1k3v83dzj

The reporting shows 6 weeks worth of in office time. There's an overall status of being compliant or manager review required. Just because your overall status is compliant, doesn't mean you won't be called out on the 2 weeks you weren't compliant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q5+1k3v83dzj

Regarding the requirement for WFH from the above statement 3 days a week for 4 out of a 6 week period.
Based on 6 weeks or 30 working days ,If you are required 3 days a week for 4 weeks or 12 days in office, is the balance of 18 days then acceptable for WFH? No one (typical) ever informed us of this . Not disputing, just want clarification on this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1k3v83dzj

The in compliance policy is in office 3 day a week for 4 out of a 6 week period but some managers are micro managing it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1k3v83dzj

They should have never left it up to the managers to monitor and enforce. Create a policy and a centralized group to enforce is consistently across the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1k3v83dzj

Is someone butt hurt about having to travel to an office?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1k3v83dzj

Post a reply

: