WFH already proved it works. We did it for years. Output didn’t drop, and in most cases it actually improved. Turns out it’s the person doing the work that matters, not the chair they’re sitting in.
The irony is we sell global connectivity, yet don’t trust our own employees to work remotely on the very networks we provide. It’s a “do as I say, not as I do” situation, and everyone sees it.
If the goal were cost and efficiency, the answer is obvious… let people work from home. Less real estate, no commute drain, same or better output.
Instead, we’re spending more to force people into buildings to do the same work… on a screen.
So what’s the real objective here?