What's larger: -23% or +76%

Need a bit of math help here - What's larger: -23% or +76%?

For example, if one company grew in value about 76% and the other grew negative 23% in value, who grew more? To make it a bit easier, you chose some fixed time fame and let's keep it in the industry, so let's make tmobile be 76 and att be -23...

Finally, once I understand what's larger, I'd like to see which factors cause numbers to differ. For example, if tmobile has a hybrid WFH system, and att is having all employees come be in the office all the time, would someone analyzing the numbers difference, be able to establish some kind of correlation here.

thank you!

#WFH #HybridWork #RTO #Performance #StockPrice

Comment! It's anonymous!

13 replies (most recent on top)

@hm exactly. This would literally match TMO and VZ headcount alone.

Contract out all the union jobs just like T-Mo and we'll be good.

A solid 69%. Nice.

@ec get rid of the union and save a bunch of money

T-Mobile has a lot less workers.

+76%

@a9 , most of who don’t “manage”/supervise anyone.

@a6 just another disgruntled union worker getting paid time and a half to sit in his truck and troll this board for absolutely no good reason other than to trigger over-stressed managers.

What do the bootlickers get from standing up for the so called leaders? I’ll never understand it. They don’t know who you are and they will lay you off just as fast as the next person. If you have no free will just say it. You’re a pathetic cuck!

@a6 Find a job elsewhere? haha Is that you DJT?

OK Resign from T and go to work for TMobile, Who is forcing you to stay here?

Do you own stock? Or are you following T stock closely for a friend?

stank's bald head and ego are bigger

Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

What's larger: -23% or +76%

13 replies (most recent on top)

Post a reply