Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Imagine telling employees we have to reduce headcount while count while flushing billions down the toilet

AT&T announced on January 5, 2026, that it will relocate its global corporate headquarters from Whitacre Tower at 208 S. Akard Street in downtown Dallas to a new, modern campus in Plano, Texas.

The new headquarters will be built on a 54-acre site at 5400 Legacy Drive (former Electronic Data Systems/EDS campus, unoccupied since 2018). The company plans to demolish existing buildings on the site and construct a low-rise, horizontal campus designed for collaboration. This will consolidate operations from its current locations in Dallas, Plano, and Irving, affecting around 6,000 employees. Partial occupancy is targeted for the second half of 2028.
Estimated Cost of the Move (Including Demolition and Rebuild)

No official cost figure has been disclosed by AT&T as of early 2026. However, based on the project’s scale and comparable corporate campus developments:
• Land acquisition — Likely in the range of $50–$150 million (the site was part of a larger parcel previously eyed for a $4 billion life sciences district called Texas Research Quarter).
• Demolition — The old EDS campus includes multiple buildings (e.g., two eight-story structures connected by a bridge). Commercial demolition typically costs $4–$8 per square foot; for an estimated 500,000–1 million sq ft of existing structures, this could be $20–$80 million.
• New construction — Modern corporate campuses (with offices, amenities, parking, and green space) often cost $300–$600 per square foot. Assuming 1–2 million sq ft of new buildable space (similar to AT&T’s current ~2 million sq ft downtown footprint but spread horizontally), construction alone could range from $500 million to $1.5 billion.
• Additional costs — Site preparation, infrastructure, IT/data center fit-out, landscaping, employee relocation/transition, and potential incentives negotiations could add $100–$300 million.
• Total estimated project cost — $1–$2 billion (potentially higher if premium amenities like fitness centers, childcare, or sustainable features are included, as seen in similar Texas campuses like Toyota’s North American HQ in Plano, which cost over $1 billion).

This is a rough estimate based on industry benchmarks for large-scale corporate campus developments in Texas. Actual costs could vary significantly depending on design specifics, inflation, and any public incentives from Plano (the city has previously offered reimbursements for site redevelopment). AT&T has emphasized the move as “cost-effective” long-term due to consolidation and employee commute improvements.

The current Dallas lease at Whitacre Tower runs through 2031, so AT&T may sublease or maintain some presence downtown during the transition.


by
| 3104 views | | 26 replies (last January 8) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ke8hjd99

26 replies (most recent on top)

regarding: The more you whine kick and scream the more evident you’re not the kinda talent we need to move forward, so buh bye! Get into the bread line! Haha

First posters complained about the poor office conditions, no maintenance, broken restrooms.
then you complained not enough desk space;
then it was not enough parking;
then it was downtown crime;
then it was the commute from the burbs to Dallas HQ;
then it was the high cost of working in the city;
and on an on.

Now that T is acting on all your complaints, moving to a spacious campus (I've been to the EDS campus) in the burbs, renovating and building new, choosing low rise buildings for better access and accommodations, and still the complaints go on and on. No matter what T does, its either not enough or wrong. Gotta wonder why all these 'experts' are on this board.

The poster above is certainly right. We need positive attitudes to effect change. Tales no brains to find fault then to find solutions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pa+1ke8hjd99

I hope they take the big outside tv at Akard to new place ! It’s sweet to watch the cowboys lose on !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jr+1ke8hjd99

Building a new campus in a prime location is probably to give the appearance of a successful and growing company. To me, it’s just disrespectful to all the people who lost their jobs for not moving to what the CEO is publicly admitting is an insufficient, unproductive space.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1ke8hjd99

@a4 typical lazy Gen Z.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e7+1ke8hjd99

This is such great news to all of us. I can’t wait to move!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1ke8hjd99

I wonder how many kickbacks the Stank, his minions and the board are getting from the construction contracts?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1ke8hjd99

We sell the infrastructure that is supposed to allow businesses to succeed WITHOUT having to build outdated wastes of money and land like this (how many residences could be built on even half the acreage they are su-king up?).

We market our products with essentially that message with all the connection blather. And they are busy touting AI as the savior, which no doubt they hope will ki-l jobs making this even more of a white elephant. Everything we do contradicts everything we say.

It’s amazing that there seems to be literally zero scrutiny of what has been going on here. Stankey and friends don’t have the communication skills to brainwash as much as they have yet it somehow is working.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dh+1ke8hjd99

“ There is ZERO legitimate reason to be in the office.”

This is the consensus of most everyone working at the office right now. If I was on a team that actually had face to face meetings or needed to collaborate then it would be fine. That is not most teams here. Even if we were all in the same building, the tech work was offshored and the us developers laid off a long time ago. You’d still not have f2f meetings. It makes no sense, it’s too expensive, it’s bad for the environment, bad for everyone’s well being, adds to the traffic issues, there is just a litany of reasons why this is bad. Not only that, where are the metrics showing a positive impact on the bottom line. I have yet to see them, no one can produce any. If anything it’s costing us money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @de+1ke8hjd99

AI applications are going to replace all of the WFH/RTO people. It’s been said that those moving data will be first. Those move molecules, ie: physical work, will be last.

As for this guy, 16 yrs as mobility tech and I’m just looking toward retiring. Su-ks I’m only 45. I don’t want to work anymore. Mortgage and debt are paid. It’s all 🥱.

Part of me wants to join the ca--abis industry and just grow trees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cn+1ke8hjd99

@ce time to go grandpa. You are as outdated as your ATT vests.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1ke8hjd99

@ce "They’ll be paying pennies on the dollar"
Not how debt works. Unless you meant 300 pennies on the dollar.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1ke8hjd99

I’ve been working at Big T for the past 27 years. It’s better to treat your job like a lease, not a mortgage. You provide a service, and in return you get a paycheck. There’s no long-term commitment neither from the company nor from yourself. You’re much happier when you see it this way. I raised a family and sent my kids to college on this income. As for the new building in Plano, do you really think the company is paying full price for it? They’ll be paying pennies on the dollar. it’s simple financial accounting. We shouldn’t worry about what the company does as long as the paycheck comes twice a month and clears. The rest is above most of our pay grade.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1ke8hjd99

The city of Dallas couldn't get their sh*t together with the homeless and crime issues that are literally plaguing the area around HQ. That said, I don't understand why we're tearing down old buildings in Plano and spending all this cash. If we just went up the toll road 5 more minutes, there's plenty of land to build.

This makes zero sense but par for the course around here. DTV, TW made zero sense either and look at where that got us. At least we have Luke Wilson in our ads now. Nice relic from the 2000s!! We sure love going back in time here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1ke8hjd99

The more you whine kick and scream the more evident you’re not the kinda talent we need to move forward, so buh bye! Get into the bread line! Haha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1ke8hjd99

When the communications company doesnt let employees use communication technology

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1ke8hjd99

@bk

But...but...but that would mean I would actually have to work!

Wah!

  • stomps feet and makes a ton of anti-RTO posts*
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1ke8hjd99

T to employees- We need to cut costs (every day, every year).

T to everything else- it’s just money

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1ke8hjd99

“There is ZERO legitimate reason to be in the office.”

Except that office presence is now a mandatory requirement for the job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1ke8hjd99

Didn't they just renovate the current HQ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1ke8hjd99

“Are you actually restarted?”

This is the first week of January but this will be a candidate for funniest post of 2026! LOL!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1ke8hjd99

Office is for collaboration and teamwork for success. Home desk is for family matters, family fued, and the view between golfing and tennis losses

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1ke8hjd99

We really don't need that many workers. We have too many workers that do nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1ke8hjd99

@a5 dude this is a desk job not a toll booth. What a terrible comparison. Are you actually restarted? Your job is done from a laptop and is solely based on using MS teams for chat and meetings, even when in the same physical building. There is ZERO legitimate reason to be in the office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1ke8hjd99

People are expendable. Infrastructure is key for growth. Happening everywhere. Ask operators or toll takers what happened to them and they will tell you what you need to hear. Or ask a ordering screen at a McDonald's because there are more of them than employees. Times are a changing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1ke8hjd99

Not to mention… WE DONT NEED AN OFFICE ANYMORE. Younger generation wants nothing to do with an office. It’s a total waste of money on an outdated model which won’t be used anymore by the time it’s ready. Once the job market improves everyone’s leaving for WFH or hybrid. It doesn’t matter how “nice” your office is. Nobody wants to commute anymore. This isn’t the 70s. Ge-z.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1ke8hjd99

It sounds great! However, it’s not the 90’s, when our stock just kept going up and money was no object. (Remember parties, travel, coffee & lunch served during meetings, unlimited office supplies). We’ve been trained to save dollars every way we can, and dumping employees is a big part of that. How can they justify this expense?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1ke8hjd99

Post a reply

: