Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Is this new rating system new.

This new rating system of forcing 20% below meet is this new?.
I am thinking it started with this era of new HR leader Bei.

I hope this is not some communist mentality of always causing anxiety among their workers.


by
| 2865 views | | 20 replies (last November 15) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k9zehehc

20 replies (most recent on top)

She was actually appointed to oversee the demolition of this enterprise. By the Chairman himself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g1+1k9zehehc

@ee European countries like Sweden / Norway claim it works for them. But with a homogeneous population, where people have common goals, this maybe possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fk+1k9zehehc

I know people who have gotten IM for years and still work here, they may get little to no raise but never get fired

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fg+1k9zehehc

@a1 It has been around, but not enforced. Now it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ec+1k9zehehc

@a9 Because there were managers in risk pushing back against this garbage. Managers with morals, ethics and integrity. Those managers were eliminated, so now it’s open season. Enjoy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1k9zehehc

"...some communist mentality..."
It's always funny (but not ha-ha funny) to see capitalism's victims still reflexively blaming communism for their woes. Propaganda and indoctrination are very effective in Merka.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1k9zehehc

Director level here. It’s real, but spoken never written. Just tell us to stack rank and be done with it. The covert implementation is cowardly and crushes morale.

Performance doesn’t follow a bell curve. The population is skewed - as you eliminate low performers, the population would skew to the right. What WF does then is just arbitrarily move the goal posts.

If we hire the right people, train them, give them the tools needed to succeed, set SMART goals, and managed appropriately, we should expect very few low performers.

If 20% of my team is truly failing to meet expectations, the problem is likely more me than them.

Just be honest and tell us to stack rank, that’s what this is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1k9zehehc

I find her repulsive 🤢 big helper to destroy American middle class!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1k9zehehc

@a4 thats 100% true and outdated mindset that little minded mgt leans on for excuses. I earned my MBA in 2013 in OD and it was covered but I knew about it way back in 2000 when Six Sigma rolled out in the org I was at (not WF). The CEO was one of his cronies who was pushing for off-shoring to India to line his pockets inside and outside because he owned ESG. Consequently after I left the company went bankrupted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1k9zehehc

I have been a victim of this cr-p since 2022. It started with gaslighting me into being accused out of left field that I did not like my job. It caused me such stress I got shingles then Covid for first time. It culminated to this year being placed on formal CA for the first time in my life. 35 yrs in FS and 19 yrs with WF. Its real!! My team is small and I am the only one my boss inherited. Chew on that. I was told CA never falls off...so I will never get a bonus or merit as long as I work here. Mind you my performance as well as anyones can be rigged by the whims of mgt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1k9zehehc

Goldman Sachs fires the bottom 10% every year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k9zehehc

The goals are 5%-15%-40%-15%-5% in order of rating.

It's been that way for about 5 years. Risk wasn't an exception so not sure how you wouldn't know

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k9zehehc

@OP here.
I am in corporate risk and all my managers (3 levels) insist that DF is mandating this 20% . No other option.

I remember about few years ago, they floated this idea, but never really enforced.
Then about 8 years ago, no mention of it at all.

I am thinking this is all tied to the overall attrition + the 4 days RTO and 8 hour in office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1k9zehehc

@a5

100%. There will always be opportunities for the best people, while those who grade out inconsistently meets and meets every review hang around forever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1k9zehehc

Its only value is in covering up bad management who failed at figuring out how to most effectively deploy their workforce.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k9zehehc

What happens in 2-3 years when all of your top performers are left fighting to not fall into that 20%, but some must.

Most companies who did this abandoned it, because its re--rded and only hurts long term health of the company.

Our leaders can't see beyond the tip of their noses though.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k9zehehc

It’s not communist. It is pure capitalist. Jack Welch came up with it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1k9zehehc

Its been around forever and used by many businesses that would have never allowed employees to collect paychecks while falsifying their times for years on end. Welcome to reality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k9zehehc

I remember when I join WF under the former CEO.
I never hear anything about the calibration

It is possible it was there, but never enforced.
But with this new CEO and HR , they seem to enforce it

Very bad mentality - making teammates hate each other , favorites vs non favorites.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k9zehehc

No it has been around for several years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k9zehehc

Post a reply

: