Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

Layoffs. What is the right number?

Kodak: Market cap 727 million. 3,700 employees.
Xerox: Market cap 247 million. 16,000 employees.
Is there a “right” layoff number or is this even a factor at this point? What am I missing here?


by
| 1814 views | | 13 replies (last February 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khbr851t

13 replies (most recent on top)

@a9 Are you sure? I read somewhere it passed. I'll take another look. Enormous focus on executive comp at the shareholders meeting. Talk track was need to keep EC in place to execute reinvention. All except the CFO I guess...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1khbr851t

@e9 best I can tell, zero. Layoffs aimed at the legacy XRX side.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ew+1khbr851t

Anyone know how many Lexmark employees were impacted?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1khbr851t

As of November, the combined companies had 25,500 employees. Not sure what the total is today

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1khbr851t

@aj This is market capitalization. It's not something you can easily calculate to salaries.. but you could say each employee should be adding roughly $15k to the bottom line or should be reduced.. also bad logic but fun to do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1khbr851t

Ergo, if “X” = excess headcount and “Y” = average salary…. X multiplied by Y = WTF? That can’t be right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1khbr851t

@a6 Steve actually tried to get golden parachutes implemented, it was a voting item for shareholders last year, but was voted down, so they are not in place.

This is public information

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1khbr851t

We just had a merger. EC will take way too long to get to the right size workforce. They F up everything. HC is based on process efficiency not market cap so we will we need more than average due to terrible work flow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1khbr851t

16,000 employees.

15,999 lay offs.

1 golden parachute 🪂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1khbr851t

@a3 it's not, but it is telling, and kind of insane. You would usually look at profit or earnings per employee, but that is a negative number, so not a great metric.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1khbr851t

@a1 Is that the typical metric or is it revenue per employee?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1khbr851t

@a1 agreed it’s like 27k. There should only be around 8000 people in Xerox - and that is probably still too much - too many layers in. XRX.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1khbr851t

That number is way off. Add Lexmark, and we're closer to 27K. Things are actually a lot worse than you think they are. If you divide the head count into the cap, you get a little under $10K per person.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1khbr851t

Post a reply

: