Both sides argued vehemently that the accidental lockout was (or was not) a coincidence with the surplus list from last week.
Now that the surplus has happened, we should know. Was anyone here who WAS locked out NOT surplused?
10 replies (most recent on top)
Once they realized the pulled trigger early they might have made changes to make it seem like not related.
It may be coincidental but I and several of my peers were locked out and our center was one of the ones surplussed last week.
No, team members who were locked out were not surplussed. One had nothing to do with the other.
@OP no and yes
No, the people who got locked out had no direct correlation to the people who were notified last week.
Yes, the lockout added to the overall employee angst and that has to be considered a good thing for our leadership. Probably an unintended benefit but maybe not unintended.
Everything is a psyop.
NO. Surplus names were due well after the “lockout”
I wanted to get locked out so I could meet that new IT person to help me.
I had a coworker get locked out but did NOT get a surplus notice
I was locked out that morning and impacted soon after.
A team mate of mine was not locked out but surplused last week
I was locked out and surplused.