Of course being replaced by ai is not impossible, and obviously scary, yet hilarious to think about our executives regurgitating data organized by ai because they won’t even know what’s incorrect.
3 replies (most recent on top)
@OP ahahahaha Genpact! Ask anyone who got “service” from Genpact! Firefighting, crisis, not paid invoices, 70%-80% retention, no documentation, suppliers cut off services due to unpaid invoices…. Now with 3M GSC transferring there… good luck 3M… Looking forward to energy cut off due to unpaid invoices…Ahhaha. And execs could have their lesson learned from Spin-Off but didn’t….
Pretty easy to read into Genpact’s history and initiatives - Similar to any consulting firm that over promises and under delivers. Regardless of it’ll work it’s happening.
From the perspective of data from 2024–2026, attempts to completely replace analysts (whether in data, finance, or business) with artificial intelligence are proving to be a misguided concept. Instead, hard market data and reports (including those from McKinsey, Forrester, and Deloitte) point to the enormous success of augmentation, a model in which AI becomes a human super-assistant.
I read an interesting article that the success rate for fully replacing analysts with AI is 10-15%, and that's only in areas where people actually enter data from Excel into the system. In many cases, such enthusiasm with AI begins with mass layoffs and then with mass hiring...
Companies that have attempted to completely eliminate analytics positions in favor of autonomous AI agents have hit a wall. According to McKinsey's global survey, a staggering 78% of companies say they use AI to support and expand the capabilities of analytics teams, not eliminate them.