Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

@qn BJ falls under Mel Bargo's direct report with intitials JA

They are under one of Mel Bargo's direct reports....BJ reports under JA.

@qn They're not under RM&C. Check CBR&C.

@eg I was browsing the career hub today and found a role that seemed to have potential. Looked up the hiring manager and guess who???

Thank you, you saved me a great deal of trouble.

@qv

How does that explain pushing out the FARB leader for the current troglodyte in that role?

JR's job was to hire as many DEI candidates into Grade 15+ positions as possible starting in 2016. As evidenced by the reverse-discrimination lawsuits at MS, a 45% "DEI" quota ("risk threshold") has likely been set by McKenzie & Co across most major banks.

The incentive structure is if management is below the risk threshold (45% DEI target), executive management gets a $20k for each woman/Hispanic/etc.

So, they get money and hit the high-level policy targets for employing "certain" candidates (sounds like bribes, right?). If you look in the employee directory, you can literally see which departments (especially in Risk) have gamed the "money for DEI" metrics.

How does a risk and compliance manager who has no background in risk or compliance get hired in the 1st place?

See above.

@eg Respectfully, who are you talking about? There is nobody under the RM&C business line who matches this. If you're going to bother raising an alarm, be more specific. You don't have to fully name them but this information is useless.

All of RMC are cr--s in a bucket.

Initials are BJ .... from Union Bank. Reports under JA

Fellow RMC employee here and the saddest part about this post is that I can’t even begin to narrow down which manager you might be talking about because your description fits so many.

Rhetorical question I presume …

Name names

@OP

"How does a risk and compliance manager who has no background in risk or compliance get hired in the 1st place?

How does she continue to be approved to harm another employee!?!"

🥾😛
🥾😛
🥾😛

I think being awful to your directs is considered a feature rather than a bug for management at this point. My manager has fired or pushed out six respected team members in the past year and is working on firing another. And yet no one considers that maybe it’s the manager who was performance issues rather than the team members who had years of positive reviews with previous managers.

Which rmc leader? Initials?

They sure are. This isn't the first time this situation has happened. Complaints to HR and the Ethics Line, loss of talent to other companies and teams, on and on. They don't care. They'll even rehire these people after they leave and decide to come back for another round of being awful.

Who is this?

At the end of the day, what really matters is that she's going into the office 3 days a week (sometimes 4) and connecting to the office IP address for 8 hours.

Nope. She was in a Hub and must have gotten an exception to WFH.

@OP But does she adhere to the RTO policy? Nothing is more important and critical than that!