Thread regarding Honeywell International Inc. layoffs

Detriments of Long Term Mandated/Forced Overtime

Long hours and risks to worker and public safety and health

Long hours can detrimentally affect workers, their co-workers, their families, consumers, and the public. Indeed, there is evidence that, despite the short-term benefits that make overtime attractive to employers (Easton and Rossin 1997), it may in the longer term create offsetting harm to an organization by decreasing quality, increasing mistakes (Babbar and Aspelin 1998; Hirschman 2000), and reducing productivity (Shepard and Clifton 2000). A study on the effects of overtime work on autoworkers found that overtime resulted in impaired performance in attention and executive functions. Workers also reported feeling more fatigued and depressed after working more than eight hours a day (Proctor et al. 1996). It is not surprising, then, that accident rates increase during overtime hours (Kogi 1991). For example, researchers have identified overtime as a factor contributing to safety incidents at nuclear power plants (Baker et al. 1994), confirming what researchers had previously found at manufacturing plants (Schuster 1985) and among anesthetists (Gander et al. 2000). Workers who work overtime face a greater risk of injury and illness (Aakerstedt 1994; Duchon et al. 1994; Rosa 1995; Smith 1996). For a typical example, a German study found that, after nine hours at work, the accident rate begins to rise; in the 12th hour the accident rate was twice as high as the rate for the first nine hours (Hanecke et al. 1998). Long work hours also multiply repetitive motions and exposure to harmful chemicals.

Further, frequent overtime and compressed work schedules that produce long workdays can be a major cause of the stress and chronic fatigue reported by many workers, as well as the ensuing occupational burnout or serious health conditions (Sparks et al. 1997; Spurgeon et al. 1997; Martens et al. 1999; Barnett et al. 1999; Shields 1999; Fenwick and Tausig 2001). Str

ess can result in increased blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases, which in some cases can have fatal consequences. The Japanese, known for long work hours, even have a word – karoshi – to describe death from overwork (Hayashi et al. 1996; and Sokejima and Kagamimori 1998).

In the U.S., job stress is estimated to cost industry $150 billion per year in absenteeism, health insurance premiums, diminished productivity, compensation claims, and direct medical costs (Donatelle and Hawkins 1989). Longer work hours can only contribute further to this drain. A study by Northwestern National Life (1991), which investigated employee burnout, found that seven out of 10 employees experiencing job stress said they frequently suffered health ailments. Frequent mandatory overtime was one of the leading five factors that caused increased stress. Employees who worked overtime on a regular basis were twice as likely (62% vs. 34%) to report that they found their jobs to be highly stressful.

https://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp120/

by
| 2613 views | | 12 replies (last June 16, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Zm1ggXo

12 replies (most recent on top)

Not sure if anyone watched the CTO Q2 Town Hall with the VP of engineering but at the 14th min mark it's worth listening to. The BP clearly states that EEI has been misused by managers and IF your manager is asking you to work the extra hours to immediately contact your tier 3 manager or HR. I'm keeping a copy of the transcript handy for my mid year review. I work overtime as needed to get the job done, I refused to play their stupid metric game.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @exmr+Zm1ggXo

-1jyv -- years ago I got screwed out of a band 4 bonus. About 7K back then. I easily withheld 10K worth of effort. I quit and called it retirement within a year of that. I preserved my sanity and the company got what they wanted -- another old guy out the door. Judging from these posts things have only gotten worse since then. People look to get a little recognition and yeah even gratitude for a job well done. Instead they get shamed and labeled as 'under-performers'. Management is disgraceful and it comes from the top.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tki+Zm1ggXo

Why not take the passive aggressive approach? So you have to put in the hours but you don't have to produce anymore than usual. That's how I've seen overtime done years ago when it was paid for exempts. The guys would just spend a significant amount of time talking and do personal business while logging hours in at the work site.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jyv+Zm1ggXo

https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/hon/institutional-holdings

The simple answer is that about 76% of HON stock is controlled by Wall Street institutional investment companies like Vanguard, Blackrock, Bank of America, State Street, Massachusetts Financial Services and more than 1,900 other ones. Their shareholders have the overwhelming majority of the voting rights per share to make any changes regarding Honeywell. They care about one thing and one thing only: Share price.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gsk+Zm1ggXo

1icy,

That’s another reason to leave this place. I have some stress thinking this will happen at Honeywell.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hdp+Zm1ggXo

Then don’t work it, stop complaining

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1icy+Zm1ggXo

Eventually, I think there will be a Honeywell workplace violence / shooting syndrome,

in this continuous employee abuse.

So many people humiliated, marriages failed in the stress, lives destroyed, careers imploding,

the resentment of working so many hours for free in this environment, getting PIPed after working for years without any raise or MIP, instead getting PIP'ed, while being beat to sh--.

Just my opinion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hsh+Zm1ggXo

It is a warning to people that may want to work at Honeywell. It also shows that Honeywell is unethical, since they are supposed to do things based on data. And this post shows that the data shows that overtime all the time increases defects and reduces performance. I have left this company, but still care about some of the people left. Honeywell does not like bad press, anything accurate and truthful that shows this how they treat people, IS important. While it may not change anything, it is a warning for others (including people in low cost regions.)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sfo+Zm1ggXo

You seem to thing Honeywell management cares about US workers. They do not. In fact they believe the more US employees that leave the better. They do not care about employees being stressed out. If driving higher EEI gets them higher bonuses that is all they care about. Stop thinking they care about employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wwg+Zm1ggXo

mtr,

If only it was doing more than nothing. It's doing nothing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tgq+Zm1ggXo

It’s better than doing nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mtr+Zm1ggXo

Interesting but what's the point of copy/pasting a 17 year old paper on an anonymous website? It's not going to change anything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eup+Zm1ggXo

Post a reply

: