Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

Refusing to re-badge

What if a certain employee refuses to re-badge to HCL. Is his fate at Xerox sealed? Does refusing present grounds for an immediate layoff? Is it even legal to lay someone off for refusing to work for a third-party company?

by
| 1662 views | | 6 replies (last April 17, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YBaOsuY

6 replies (most recent on top)

@myy, believe me, we did, Xerox made sure we could not collect!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xpg+YBaOsuY

@zah unemployment laws vary by state. In many states you can collect unemployment when declining a rebadge situation. Contact your unemployment office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @myy+YBaOsuY

you cannot collect unemployment because you are being offered a comparable job

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zah+YBaOsuY

It was actually stated in the HCL paperwork that if you chose not to sign with HCL, in the 3-day window you were allotted to decide (at the end of March), that would mean that you chose to resign. That employee's last day should have been 4/5, per the documentation that I saw.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cyz+YBaOsuY

From posts here they say refusing to rebadge is resigning. I question whether that holds up in court though. There are similar things that happen all the time, when a company splits for example.

When Xerox and Conduent parted ways, I assume all the people working on the services side the business were rebadged, but that felt different since you weren't going to an Indian outsourcing company. Of course, many of those people have since lost their jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @skg+YBaOsuY

If you don’t rebadge they will let you go and you get nothing. Not even unemployment.

It’s all very calculated.

Take the rebadge and look for another job, now!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qkx+YBaOsuY

Post a reply

: