Manager here too, no view of this. All agreed much further up.
I know Blackstone have been reviewing the different parts of the business in huge detail since March-April-May as I know people who presented to them.
I take a different view from most though. Previous re-orgs have been solely about the headcount and everyone having to lose 5%-10% (or whatever). This seems much more targeted to me as they're losing specific roles and teams, not hitting everyone, so in a perverse way kind of prefer it this time round.
As frustrating as it is, not knowing in advance who was going and who is safe is actually how redundancies SHOULD be done. Hearing people gloat that they're safe way before any official announcement was always pretty sh*t.
I’m not the original poster, just found this to be a great analysis of this round of layoffs, OP (postID) hit the nail on a head. It was originally posted as a reply on another thread (someone asked if managers had more insider info about who’s been selected and why, instead of giving insider info, poster gave his point of view, which I tend to agree on).