Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

Cuts are costing us new clients

People are not 'totally useless' or 'turnips' (to use your unfortunate phraseology).

Poor-performing worker were the first to go back when HR forced the management to 'find' their 15% for the lower quartile of the appraisal bell-curve. Remember that nice unethical misuse of statistics? The cuts then continued into the good workers and each time the bell curve drew towards the mean, which moved towards the 2's until 1 and beyond would no longer save you.

Of course when that nonsense was made public and could result in potential appeals and tribunals, HR were forced to deny any wrong-doing and claimed their messages were 'misinterpreted by some management' despite the secret powerpoints that were floating through the management only community at the time.

Years of cuts have removed relative poor performance. If you think you still see it, then that's your natural instinct for survival in the current environment of fear. 'Why not cut him or her, they don't do anything'. Yeah, keep it coming - stitch up a friend and win a book token.

So many reductions has cut the flesh, now they're cutting the back(bones) of the company.

But - and this is where common sense goes out of the window - they are now cutting those bringing in the revenue. Yes, you heard right - they are cutting those people who are bringing in the revenue! Why? Their cost. Apparently, 10 and 20 year experience costs money and DXC don't like cost when someone with 4 weeks knowledge of how to turn-it-off and turn-it-on-again can be purchased for the price of a happy meal.

I've seen quite a few projects go pear-shaped because the key folk were dropped and replaced with low-cost alternatives. Sure skills, but no leadership, knowledge of client business or systems.

As a result, I've seen 2 contracts, this year, cancelled by new clients. Yes, I'll say it again: 'new' clients, requesting early contract termination after only 6 months into the contract!

DXC were unable to resource the skills to meet those impressive powerpoint claims made by the salesforce and bid teams (bonused on wins. Well, not bonused any more, shall we say threatened).

A last ditch attempt to save the contract, by requesting senior sign-off to use contractors was denied and so payment milestone #1 was missed resulting in the client then requesting early contract termination for DXC's failure to honor its commitments. The cost of preparing all those winning powerpoints, establishing the setup and governance and then failing to find any skills to deliver, plus the cost of penalty payments and those costs have to be paid for by more job losses. So you seen, its a self-perpetuating spiral to the bottom and its speeding up. You can't stop it now.

This is not about experience or lack of an no-one should feel any WFR is personal in any way. This is purely cost-driven to inflate the shareprice with hot-air so they can break it up and sell if off next year if next 3 quarterly signs are that there is no pivot point in sight and horizon of growth to meeting that 26 billion gazillion revenue dream is fading.

Of course we've all lifted the hood and can quite clearly see that there is no engine in this Chevvy. But hey, keep on polishing the bodywork because I think I can see a customer whose just walked onto the forecourt.

Quick, where's that salesforce guy, the one with the nice powerpoints?

Posted by @Oz3Dly0-1mep.

by
| 3112 views | | 12 replies (last August 10, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OBVdoHv

12 replies (most recent on top)

Hmmmm, I actually am in delivery and had a layer added! A whole lot of uselessness!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6oss+OBVdoHv

I never noticed a change either. Guess that is how much they were needed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5zmg+OBVdoHv

@5kxx According to there Earnings Call the removed four layers of management are within the Delivery and Support organisations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5coe+OBVdoHv

I must admit that I have not seen "4 layers of management" being removed so far:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/09/dxc_results/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5kxx+OBVdoHv

Look on the bright side ... DXC losing contracts or renewals means more work for its competitors. I'm looking forward to the day that DXC is rated as junk stock on the share market, but by that time the current management would have collected their massive bonuses for WFR'ing decent hard-working employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wig+OBVdoHv

Yes the gutting of experienced resources is causing severe revenue loss. A contract I support is missing billable hour targets every single month because the low cost resources are not pulling their weight.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xhf+OBVdoHv

Dly0--1emp, well put for the in depth analysis of current climate at this organization. Precisely the key words " self-perpetuating spiral to the bottom and its speeding up. You can't stop it now.". I took a cut in pay to join the DXC predecessor - HPE shortly before spinmerge. It's not because I lacked of self worth or not marketable. I naively believed in the HP I once admired a couple of decades ago. I became one of the statistic as part of the first WFR - cause I made over 6 figure in salary! Before accepting the job offer, I was actively pursued by the recruiter as I had another job offer at the same time.

A few words of encouragement for my former colleagues who are facing the inevitable of upcoming WFR... after a couple months of rest .. I joined one of tier-1 consulting as a contractor with great $$.. they recognized my expertise and skills and appreciate my contribution even as a "contractor" - better than how I was treated as a full(regular)!employee at DXC. I understand benefits (so called) still play a big role for some of you... in my case the bigger $$ I now make surpass what I had to endure at DXC...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gih+OBVdoHv

You open your post by stating that people are not useless, then proceed to write FIVE paragraphs about how useless the managers and new hires are. Yes I see the turnips are alive and well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ips+OBVdoHv

Very well written, OP. DXC seems to be only focused on cost and making such random decisions. I wish I would get a call back from so many places that I have applied to externally, so I can get out of this crappy madhouse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nky+OBVdoHv

When are we going to see some of this inept managment cut?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @owe+OBVdoHv

DXC management is driving the cuts so they need to take responsibility for their actions. If they can't see past their noses in the trough then the message is simple: accept the fact that working for DXC is very short-term.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @voh+OBVdoHv

Let it bleed. Inept management is the main reason why companies fail. Lack of capital is number TWO. and Loss of talent is THREE. It takes years to make a great company and only 12 mos for it to fail. Miss all my prior pals from EDS, HP, and HPE. Those were the days.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @adg+OBVdoHv

Post a reply

: