Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Lots of nonsenses

Can a company innovate via laying off hard working, experienced engineers?

So, senior engineers having lots of valuable experiences and high-end skill sets are no match to those so called new, young engineers to drive the company in the new mobile biz sucessfully in the future?

It should be the opposite way even from a common sense point of view. I wonder who the hell can think about this stupid idea. In the end, Intel will suffer quality issues and it has been already decades due to lack of experiences and shallow depth of knowledges. But then, BK is announcing that the Company is going through this big innovation, reshaping for the future biz and has to do massive and ruthless layoffs while still hiring RCGs, promoting lots VPs and principal positoins. On the other hand,

when we ask about promotions, I often heard that group leaders saying "we don't need G8, G9, G10. Why do we need them? Also, it will be very hard to give promotions." However, company is now asking people with no promotions to leave. So, they say those words based on their conveniences and rationalization. BK and all his staffs should be FIRED in hell.

by
| 1504 views | | 7 replies (last May 12, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HljNvoB

7 replies (most recent on top)

In the early days, they used to throw a lot of cash at us. Stock options could exceed your salary. People would suffer a lot of abuse for that -- these are the "golden handcuffs." That ended in 2000.

I can run circles around a new engineer. I trained a lot of them.

But I'm leaving - not worth the stress and no upward mobility. Decades of experience will leave. Intel will go on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qqc+HljNvoB

People are missing the economic realities that the sector is facing. It's not a growing market as it once was this is the right response done way too late. The problem is lack of leaderships ability to see that the market was not and is not coming back. How did they hire so many people in the last few years? Why? And those that had jobs for as long as they did well you were lucky that's it. Tech has hit a plateau for now. Hard to say if or what will spur worldwide economic growth in the future. It isn't going to be China.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nfi+HljNvoB

Yes to the consultant gigs. Very lucrative, don't accept anything less than $125/hr

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ind+HljNvoB

Intel competition based focal and promotion schemes worked well when intel was a growing company, when there were endless lines of RCGs feeding in at the bottom. People were expected to get promos and get more responsibility and scope. We have never changed this expectation in spite of the fact there are hardly any RCGs feeding the machine for years now. And so like any late stage Ponzi scheme, this system is imploding

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dgh+HljNvoB

Just come back in 2months as triple-paid consultant doing exactly the same job you do now but thrice as expensive for the company. They are asking for it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wde+HljNvoB

This is what happens when you put the company into the hands of a chemist, and a piss poor one at that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zcl+HljNvoB

They talk in circles, have no clue as to what they're doing or how it's impacting, A once good company.

Very sad to see it deteriorate. Cut throat from here on out

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kwk+HljNvoB

Post a reply

: