Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

VSP Questions answered...

Why was I selected for the VSP: because you have not received anything better than a SL3 for the past 4 years and have been in you job grade for longer than average.

Will I get laid off if I don't take it: depends on what job you are doing. The next phase of the layoff will target certain areas and HR is using a performance algorithm that will put VSP people at the bottom of the list so VSP will get laid off in the next round in those jobs

What jobs are getting targeted next round: canceled projects the ones you all have read about in the media, small teams at minor Intel sites for a larger group, so if your not at a Intel site over 1000 people its you. Then there is areas Intel executives have target for efficiency, like program managers, product planners, architects, design automation.. if you have job code that sounds like anyone of those you are likely on list that will get vetted through the HR performance tool.

What is this HR performance tool and how does it relate to VSP: its algorithm developed by Intel lawyers to make sure the selected employees have no case of worker discrimination for a class action lawsuit. By using an algorithm it can say the selection was objective. The criteria is irrelevant to the law as long as its not targeting a protected class. For instance Intel can target people with names that start with letters N-Z, just as easily as "low performers" as long as the algorithm picks the people.

What happen if I don't take the VSP and get laid off in the next wave: it will be no different than if you took the VSP. So far the ISP, Site closure and VSP packages have been the same. And its likely till they end ACT they will stay that way. Intel management is ruthless but they are not spiteful. Why offer ISP or VSP a better package then a better performer that just happens to be on the wrong project or wrong site or in a job with too many people

With a VSP if I make it through this next wave am I safe: depends on what your boss tells you. The notes from MCM this past week are real. If you have had the same boss for the past few years and never gotten anything better than a SL3 you are likely on his/her sh-- list and one focal cycle away from a SL4 and ISP. And the tone of the letters are clearly showing an intent in future focals to bucket a lower 15% of the population into the you will get fired list.

by
| 4955 views | | 13 replies (last May 12, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HlIiGSv

13 replies (most recent on top)

MVE group in PEG was told by their GM that everybody who has got VSP would be out by next April if they do not get EE or O reviews next. That a$$hat even said on record that this message has not been cleared by Legal yet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rto+HlIiGSv

What is your current grade that you have been in too long (as determined by HR). Sorry for your situation, thanks for sharing info.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hev+HlIiGSv

@jmm: That is a key question. Why would a manager want to give a VSP employee a "stay" message if the employee ends up with an ISP in the next round?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wws+HlIiGSv

question to the original poster: will the HR tool and algorithm developed by lawyers exclude recent hires in the excess people categories biasing the next round again to people who have been here longer? I know it seems like a rhetorical question but thought would ask just in case answer is known

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jia+HlIiGSv

What percentage of VSPs will be affected on the next round? 50% more or less ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxt+HlIiGSv

Does a manager get a say in preventing his VSP EMPLOYEE from getting an ISP in next round?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jmm+HlIiGSv

Can u provide more details on what happened in MCM?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hxv+HlIiGSv

hi value post original

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dwq+HlIiGSv

Another detail on separation packages and underlying threats in the leaked email of lower packages in the future. Intel set aside a $1.4Billion as a financial charge for this action. In it press release it stated this action will continue through 2017. What this means is they set the packages and until they run out of that $1.4Billion the packages will be the same.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cow+HlIiGSv

Great summary

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qjn+HlIiGSv

Agree with the given explanation, perfect answers for most of the questions related to VSP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nib+HlIiGSv

If the VSP gets chosen for ISP in next round, can they be hired again or not?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oda+HlIiGSv

well explained

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvg+HlIiGSv

Post a reply

: