Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Will any of the 387 Divison VPs, 24 Executive VPs, or 24 Corporate VPs get ISPd when their project is cancelled?

Intel did a spans and levels layoff in 2007 - which IMHO was a good thing. A lot of redundant people were let go, and "managers" who had one or two direct reports were relieved of the "manager" title and became just another individual contributor. The company flattened out and things were going "okay".

It's now back to layers and layers of bureaucracy and squabbling. The Oregon sites were supposed to have a max of 10,000 employees after spans and levels. It was planned to bump up to 14,000 after D1X was up and running. We're at 20,000 employees or so now ... and D1X isn't online. Intel didn't even follow their own Strategic Long Range Plan and Budget, and now the employees are paying for it. Who is being held accountable for that colossal error - what have these additional 10,000 people been doing for the past nine years?? And the Oregon site is laying off less than 1,000 - so they're still over their SLRP employee count of 14,000. Why have a SLRP if you're just going to ignore it?

Flatten it out again, cull out redundant management, why do you need 24 Corporate VPs, 24 Sr VPs/Executives, and 387 Division VPs at $280k a year each - or $115,080,000 in base salary each year?

This is not including CEO base salary of around $900,000 (times three or more depending on buy-out / hiring bonus in 2015/2016) so figure $120,000,000 a year just in base salaries of the executives and VPs. This doesn't even include stock and other compensation. When projects get cancelled, will the VPs of those divisions get an ISP also? They no longer have people reporting to the, and no project to oversee, logically, they should also get ISPd (IMHO).

by
| 1455 views | | 9 replies (last May 1, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HaJL8Yv

9 replies (most recent on top)

More than 6 layers between the CEO and an IC would not be lean or agile.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bsa+HaJL8Yv

I remember when I joined Intel a few years ago, there were 6 levels between CEO and me, now it is 9. Unbelievable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nyc+HaJL8Yv

how many GR10+ individual contributors are still around?? and, 90% of the VPs are absolutely worthless...time to go!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tap+HaJL8Yv

Speaking of layers of management. Between BK and me, there are 4 VPs, 2 non VP directors and 1 manager. I am a low level IC.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ddr+HaJL8Yv

BK will never touch the layers and layers of buffoons. The bureaucracy has gotten out of control. if BK thought that it was the problem he would have started flattening the organization.

How does BK know where the problem is - he has to get the info from the middle management. Are they going to admit that they are the problem ? Are they going to advise him to cut the middle manages so they loose their jobs. Hell No. Who are these morons going to blame - the ICs and the worker bees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ghu+HaJL8Yv

BK protects his own and will not touch any of the VP's.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvt+HaJL8Yv

Lot of managers with 1-2 people report to at intel, they are doing not things.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xtg+HaJL8Yv

These are the guys hiring H-1Bs so they can complete the glide path to retirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yrn+HaJL8Yv

If there is any logic operating then yes. But expect them to trigger big golden parachutes and take forever and ever to be off payroll

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gcs+HaJL8Yv

Post a reply

: