Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Want change at Intel? Let go VP, Managers and PEs. This layoff will achieve nothing.

Earlier post was censored.

by
| 1893 views | | 12 replies (last June 21, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HZ8ACl1

12 replies (most recent on top)

Test

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fzd+HZ8ACl1

@1qnu ha! you noticed that too? IC career path at Intel- suck as an IC, get job as GL, suck as GL, get job as staff engineer. Pretty much the ONLY way past G8 as IC. They got what they deserve.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dsh+HZ8ACl1

"Many PEs might have been good engineers at a point in their past but Intel ruined them, turned them into power point rangers and politicians that don't actually contribute anything useful most of the time. Their fat salary could not be justified by any company not experiencing 62% margins."

Too true. Intel - culture and structure - couldn't do more to discourage real innovation from PE's or from other employees

Getting to be a PE requires being chosen by Intel management and more often than not a commitment and mastery of "managing up" - leaving good ideas behind in order to do whatever random thing that comes from above, without question and in a way that strokes the ego of whatever senior person proposed.

The Emperors frequently have no clothes but PEs (VPs and those gunning for PE) will be the last to point it out.

Any we wonder why so many bad ideas come to multi-billion dollar fruition!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bgt+HZ8ACl1

The vast majority of PEs in my site contribute almost nothing in terms of innovation and play political games. Most are ex-managers who went back to being ICs and got a PE title as a compensation.

A very few PEs are innovators who really advance the company and the industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qnu+HZ8ACl1

Many PEs might have been good engineers at a point in their past but Intel ruined them, turned them into power point rangers and politicians that don't actually contribute anything useful most of the time. Their fat salary could not be justified by any company not experiencing 62% margins.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wym+HZ8ACl1

"To become a PE you need at least 15 to 20 years of making up data, presenting power point bs to get all the credit, and most importantly being a manager's pet. The backbone are the technicians and engineers who bust their asses at Intel."

There are a couple PE's in my group who used those skills (and few others) to get PE in <10 years

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dpx+HZ8ACl1

Don't forget a good chunk of HR. Those in HR doing social engineering are worthless and helping to destroy the company. Or should i say 'fundamentally transform' it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kta+HZ8ACl1

@ 1fnt - spoken like a true suck-up. Most of the PE's got to their position by favoritism (from their manager) , taking credit for others work and powerpoint engineering. Then there are the "diverse" PE's i.e. women who were randomly promoted. There was a graphic on circuit recently stating that the number of women PE's went from 12 to 22 in 1 year. Clearly they weren't promoted on merit....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gdr+HZ8ACl1

To become a PE you need at least 15 to 20 years of making up data, presenting power point bs to get all the credit, and most importantly being a manager's pet. The backbone are the technicians and engineers who bust their asses at Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fxf+HZ8ACl1

PE's are the engine behind the company's growth. They're being held back by the 6:1 ratio of VP's to PE's, positions that are supposedly equivalent. Yet whenever promo announcements come out, there are about 50-100 new VP's and a dozen PE's. Agree on VP's, but the PE's need to stay.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fnt+HZ8ACl1

Just what Intel needs... LOL

".. 🙈 Diane Bryant is hiring ANOTHER VP

for Health and Sciences in DCG ... 😰"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xqv+HZ8ACl1

OP 😋

... 🙈 Diane Bryant is hiring ANOTHER VP

for Health and Sciences in DCG ... 😰

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gky+HZ8ACl1

Post a reply

: