The primary objective in a chess game is to capture the king but when you inject the present orders (conditions) of headcount elimination without severance to save money (character assassination). The game now changes without informing the chess players (employees). Sneaky tactics to eliminate people managers do not like based on age, salary, skin color or pure jealousy and dislikes. Cover up the reasons and use whatever tools necessary such as misleading, play on words and then us corporate security to find something so insignificant. Let us not forget the sneaky nut and bolts quarter review outlines(riddled with pits to trick you up). I am from the south and let us see how many southern managers have eliminated Yankees and Blacks, Yup the south is still kicking (flags still wavy). Did you know the same is done at Wells Fargo? HR told me -we place all the Yankees at Harris complex and all the Southern people in uptown because that is how it is done here-. Using our own CEO words of wisdom -they all do it-(discriminate).
Change the game like cool hand Luke and place a Black manager to fire black employees then change out the manager. The Bank of America employee hand book is polar opposite depending on what department you work for (I have compared the fine print). Security has specific rules (details) undisclosed hidden deep in archives away from the employee handbooks (It takes a long time to find it but might be found surfing an unorganized data base of rules regulations that would take a normal person years of surfing) Bury rules in mounds of online databases (pentagon wars -papercuts-). Let us not forget amending rules to fit our needs then undo the amending after we have eliminated enough headcount. One example is email classification and how do you classify an email. There is a mention about this but no real understanding of how to perform this with the email system used such as Outlook because it is based on a persons perception (Yup more game plays as Hilary Clinton knows all about it). Do you add a hint in the subject line or ooo is there also a hidden dropdown box to classify it or do you encrypt (counter intuitive or counterintuitive misleading policies)? Another rule is to lock your computer with a password, key cable and do not forget your cabinets before you leave your desk or you have created a violation. This is grilled with tests and in the handbook. You frackin think anyone can perform this task (it takes time when running to meetings back to back). Do you really think managers perform this? (Listen up! it does not happen fools, Peeing in the bathroom is more important). Security announces they will be auditing a department for violations and the department supervisor will share with lower tier managers and the manager might tell the employees they favor. Tuff shit for everyone else. It is all a con game. The entire bank would be eliminated if this was enforced covertly with security operatives walking around. Lets check the managers covertly first (never happen). However we use these games if we do not want headcount. The other area of interest is a quote from our CEO, -Everyone does it-. I have friends who work at non-bank institutions and let me make it clear, the bank instructs other businesses how to cheat better and then claims everyone does it. Character assassination and discrimination.