Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

What's your opinion?

RTO in effect.
Meeting RTO expectations 3 days a week.
Not on any bad reports.
Team is rocking and doing excellent!

Got inconsistently meets specifically because "people complained of not seeing me in person," yet no specific details shared on who, when, what, why. People are forgetting about work/life balance and eliminating on the "outcome" of work just to police something so ridiculous. I'm not one to badge in/out and leave. So that is out of the question.

Office availability posted on walls/WF site/etc. = all flex spaces are open and office spaces are open if not assigned. If not avail in a certain floor, all other spaces are avail. I choose an office space because it's private, an option, and I cannot handle earphones all day long in an open cube space - they hurt and I have teams in diff Time Zones. So the reasoning, to me is vague and not cool - almost discriminatory.

by
| 1520 views | | 11 replies (last July 31, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tJy4nfC

11 replies (most recent on top)

That is why you have a badge. If you don’t click in that is your fault

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jbc+1tJy4nfC

I like the term "Rank and Yank" better than stack ranking. Here is a little AI (gemini) for us.

Rank and Yank: A Jack Welch Legacy
Rank and yank, also known as forced ranking or stack ranking, is a performance management system where employees are ranked against each other, often on a bell curve distribution. The top performers are rewarded, while those at the bottom are typically terminated or reassigned.  

This practice was popularized by Jack Welch during his tenure as CEO of General Electric (GE). The intention was to create a high-performance culture by identifying and rewarding top performers while eliminating underperformers.  

Key aspects of rank and yank:
Forced distribution: Employees are ranked on a predetermined curve, often with a small percentage of top performers, a larger middle group, and a small bottom group.  
Performance differentiation: Clear distinctions are made between high, medium, and low performers.  
Consequences: Top performers receive rewards like bonuses, promotions, or increased responsibilities. Bottom performers may face termination, demotion, or reassignment.
Criticisms and Decline
While rank and yank was once seen as a revolutionary approach, it has faced increasing criticism over the years. Critics argue that it:

Demoralizes employees: Creates a competitive and cutthroat environment.  
Hinders collaboration: Encourages employees to compete rather than cooperate.  
Leads to inaccurate evaluations: Forces managers to rank employees artificially.
Ignores external factors: Doesn't account for differences in roles, departments, or economic conditions.
Due to these criticisms and evolving management philosophies, many companies have abandoned rank and yank in favor of more holistic performance management systems.  

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wwa+1tJy4nfC

If five other people are ar-e holes, then maybe, just maybe, I’m the ar-e hole!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vab+1tJy4nfC

Make a point every day to go say hi to each and every member of your team. Problem solved

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1urj+1tJy4nfC

There’s always a tattle tale (aka mgr brown noser) on the team!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bld+1tJy4nfC

This place has completely Fd ideas of what's important and it starts at the top. Shart has completely failed, it's time for him to retire. He was brought in to carry out a massive downsizing campaign, that much is obvious, but he was not brought here to destroy what will remain with his merciless campaign to tank morale and a complete lack of vision. He's a failed executive, and expensive as heck to boot. In the end he'll get paid probably $150M, and for what, exactly? Listening to the overpriced consultants, then turning around and yelling the OC 'yeah, do that'. He's a joke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hkl+1tJy4nfC

Is "being seen' one of your goals? Serious question.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dtl+1tJy4nfC

"People" are p*ssed you feel entitled and are squatting in closed office all day while they are sitting in open cubes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kdf+1tJy4nfC

You got the Jack Welch sc--w over. The stacked rating system which forces you in competition with your peers. Someone had to be knocked down to inconsistently meets. Tag you are it. That’s why the BS excuse of not being seen. They had to come up with something to ding you on.

I don’t know a single manager who likes this system. It forces managers to underrate employees. They can submit everyone as at least meets, but up 1 to 2 levels they will come back to your manager and tell them to berate someone lower.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nad+1tJy4nfC

My Team is all over the place. Like 90% + everyone is on MS TEAMS daily. So the issue is on meeting expectations for RTO. I'm meeting it so why get a bad rap for it is my deal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shj+1tJy4nfC

So, you go into the office, but don't sit near your team? Then your manager is accurate in that nobody sees you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dvf+1tJy4nfC

Post a reply

: